Department of Psychology, University of Essex, UK.
Br J Health Psychol. 2020 May;25(2):358-376. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12411. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
Objectives To reduce overprescribing, health campaigns urge physicians to provide people with information regarding appropriate antibiotic use and encourage the public to trust their physicians' prescribing decisions. We test (1) whether providing individuals with complete information about the viral aetiology of an illness and the ineffectiveness of antibiotics will reduce inappropriate antibiotic expectations, (2) whether individuals with greater trust in their physician will have lower expectations, and (3) whether individuals with greater trust in their physician will benefit more from the complete information provision and have lower expectations. Design Experiment 1 features a between-subjects design (information provision: baseline vs. complete information) with a general measure of participants' trust in their physician. Experiment 2 features a 2 (physician trustworthiness: low vs. high) × 2 (information provision: baseline vs. complete information) between-subjects design. Methods In Experiment 1, participants (n = 366) reported their trust in their physician, read a vignette describing a hypothetical consultation with a physician for a viral cold and then expressed their expectations for antibiotics. In Experiment 2, participants (n = 380) read a vignette of a consultation with a physician for a viral ear infection then expressed their expectations for antibiotics. Results In both experiments, the provision of complete information significantly reduced inappropriate expectations for antibiotics. Greater trust in physicians was associated with higher antibiotic expectations in Experiment 1, but lower expectations in Experiment 2. In both experiments, trust in physicians appeared to facilitate the effect of information provision, but this effect was weak and inconsistent. Conclusion Providing information about viral aetiology and the ineffectiveness and side effects of antibiotics reduces inappropriate antibiotic expectations. Further research into the effect of trust in physicians as a moderator of the effect information provision is required, particularly given the recent increase in trust-based antibiotic campaigns. Statement of contribution What is already known Inappropriate expectations for antibiotics encourage overprescribing in primary care. To reduce inappropriate expectations, interventions often aim to educate people about antibiotics and encourage them to trust their physician. What does this study add Causal evidence that clinical information provision reduces but does not eliminate inappropriate antibiotic expectations. We find that increased trust in physicians is not always associated with lower expectations for antibiotics. Although increased trust seemed to boost the effect of information provision, this effect was weak and inconsistent.
为了减少过度用药,健康宣传活动敦促医生向民众提供有关合理使用抗生素的信息,并鼓励公众信任医生的处方决策。我们检验了以下内容:(1)为患者提供有关疾病病毒病因和抗生素无效性的完整信息是否会降低不合理的抗生素预期;(2)个体对医生的信任度是否会降低预期;(3)个体对医生的信任度是否会从完整信息的提供中受益更多,并降低预期。
实验 1 采用了被试间设计(信息提供:基线与完整信息),并测量了参与者对医生的信任度的一般指标。实验 2 采用了 2(医生可信度:低与高)×2(信息提供:基线与完整信息)的被试间设计。
在实验 1 中,366 名参与者报告了他们对医生的信任度,阅读了一段描述与医生进行病毒性感冒咨询的虚拟病例的描述,然后表达了他们对使用抗生素的期望。在实验 2 中,380 名参与者阅读了与医生进行病毒性耳部感染咨询的病例描述,然后表达了他们对使用抗生素的期望。
在两项实验中,提供完整信息都显著降低了不合理的抗生素预期。在实验 1 中,对医生的信任度越高,抗生素的预期就越高,但在实验 2 中,情况则相反。在两项实验中,对医生的信任似乎都促进了信息提供的效果,但这种效果较弱且不一致。
提供有关病毒病因、抗生素无效性和副作用的信息可降低不合理的抗生素预期。需要进一步研究医生信任作为信息提供效果的调节因素的作用,特别是考虑到最近基于信任的抗生素宣传活动的增加。