• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

佛罗里达患者中按种族/民族和手术类型划分的代谢和减重手术后的住院时间

Hospital Length of Stay after Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery by Race/Ethnicity and Procedure Type among Florida Patients.

机构信息

Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.

Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.

出版信息

J Natl Med Assoc. 2020 Apr;112(2):158-166. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2020.02.007. Epub 2020 Mar 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.jnma.2020.02.007
PMID:32197897
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (MBS) has become increasingly common as a treatment option for severely obese. We examined the association of hospital length of stay (LOS) by race-ethnicity (Hispanic, non-Hispanic white [NHW], NH black [NHB]) and MBS-procedure among Florida inpatients.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of inpatient records was performed using the 2016 Florida Agency for Health Care Administrative (AHCA) data. Records of Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB), Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding (LAGB), and Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) procedures based on ICD 10th edition code were analyzed. Via logistic regression analysis, the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of longer LOS (≥2 versus < 2days) and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for racial-ethnic groups (NHW versus other groups) and MBS type (SG versus LAGB or RYGB) adjusted for age, sex, BMI, and insurance status.

RESULTS

The majority of the sample (N = 10,630, approximately 56% NHW, 21% NHB, 20% Hispanic, 3% Other) underwent SG (71%), followed by RYGB (24%) and LAGB (5%). Hispanic were more likely (aOR 1.27; 95% CI 1.14-1.42) and NHB were less likely (0.68; 0.61-0.75) than NHW to have longer LOS regardless of MBS type. Compared to SG, LAGB patients were more likely (2.09; 1.70-2.55) but RYGB patients were less likely (0.32; 0.29-0.36) to have longer LOS.

CONCLUSIONS

Although LAGB is considered the least invasive MBS, recipients tend to stay longer in hospital after adjustment for health insurance and sociodemographic factors. Medical and socioecological reasons for racial-ethnic variations in LOS relating MBS should be explored further.

摘要

目的

代谢与减重手术(MBS)作为严重肥胖症的治疗选择已越来越普遍。我们研究了佛罗里达州住院患者的种族-族裔(西班牙裔、非西班牙裔白人[NHW]、NH 黑人[NHB])和 MBS 手术的住院时间(LOS)与种族-族裔之间的关联。

设计

使用 2016 年佛罗里达州卫生保健管理局(AHCA)数据对住院病历进行二次分析。根据 ICD10 版代码分析腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(RYGB)、腹腔镜可调胃带术(LAGB)和袖状胃切除术(SG)的记录。通过逻辑回归分析,计算了种族-族裔群体(NHW 与其他群体)和 MBS 类型(SG 与 LAGB 或 RYGB)之间的调整后比值比(aOR)和相应的 95%置信区间(CI),并对年龄、性别、BMI 和保险状况进行了调整。

结果

大多数样本(N=10630,约 56%NHW、21%NHB、20%西班牙裔、3%其他)接受了 SG(71%),其次是 RYGB(24%)和 LAGB(5%)。无论 MBS 类型如何,西班牙裔患者(aOR1.27;95%CI1.14-1.42)更有可能且 NHB 患者(0.68;0.61-0.75)不太可能出现较长的 LOS。与 SG 相比,LAGB 患者(2.09;1.70-2.55)更有可能,但 RYGB 患者(0.32;0.29-0.36)不太可能出现较长的 LOS。

结论

尽管 LAGB 被认为是最微创的 MBS,但在调整医疗保险和社会人口因素后,接受者在医院的住院时间往往更长。应进一步探讨与 MBS 相关的种族-族裔 LOS 差异的医学和社会生态学原因。

相似文献

1
Hospital Length of Stay after Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery by Race/Ethnicity and Procedure Type among Florida Patients.佛罗里达患者中按种族/民族和手术类型划分的代谢和减重手术后的住院时间
J Natl Med Assoc. 2020 Apr;112(2):158-166. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2020.02.007. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
2
Outcomes in racial minorities after robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a retrospective review of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database.机器人 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术治疗少数民族患者的结局:代谢和减重手术认证和质量改进计划数据库的回顾性研究。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2021 Mar;17(3):595-605. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.10.019. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
3
Length of stay by uncomplicated diabetes bariatric surgery patients: A laparoscopic adjustable banding versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.非复杂性糖尿病减重手术患者的住院时间:腹腔镜可调节带与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的比较。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Oct;25(5):779-787. doi: 10.1111/jep.13068. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
4
Rate of revisions or conversion after bariatric surgery over 10 years in the state of New York.在纽约州,10 年内进行减重手术后的修订或转换率。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Apr;14(4):500-507. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2017.12.019. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
5
Racial disparities in reasons for mortality following bariatric surgery.肥胖症手术治疗后死亡率差异的原因。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2023 Apr;10(2):526-535. doi: 10.1007/s40615-022-01242-5. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
6
Adolescent Bariatric Surgery: Effects of Socioeconomic, Demographic, and Hospital Characteristics on Cost, Length of Stay, and Type of Procedure Performed.青少年减重手术:社会经济、人口统计学和医院特征对成本、住院时间和手术类型的影响。
Obes Surg. 2019 Mar;29(3):757-764. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-03657-8.
7
Patterns of Bariatric Surgeries Among U.S. Women Diagnosed with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome.美国多囊卵巢综合征女性行减重手术的模式。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 Apr;29(4):585-595. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2019.7947. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
8
Evaluating Safety and Durability of Adolescent Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.评估青少年代谢和减重手术的安全性和耐久性。
J Surg Res. 2024 Nov;303:332-341. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2024.09.010. Epub 2024 Oct 12.
9
Gastric band conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass shows greater weight loss than conversion to sleeve gastrectomy: 5-year outcomes.胃束带转换为 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术比转换为袖状胃切除术能获得更大的减重效果:5 年随访结果。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 Oct;14(10):1531-1536. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.06.002. Epub 2018 Jun 10.
10
Comparative effectiveness of 3 bariatric surgery procedures: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, laparoscopic adjustable gastric band, and sleeve gastrectomy.三种减肥手术方法的比较效果:Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术、腹腔镜可调节胃束带术和袖状胃切除术。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 Jun;12(5):997-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.01.020. Epub 2016 Jan 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of patients on immunosuppressants undergoing sleeve gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, and duodenal switch: analysis of 19,414 patients.对接受袖状胃切除术、Roux-en-Y胃旁路术和十二指肠转位术的免疫抑制剂治疗患者的评估:19414例患者的分析。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2025 Aug;21(8):853-860. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2025.02.001. Epub 2025 Feb 15.