Suppr超能文献

比较计算机断层静脉造影和血管内超声在慢性静脉疾病患者髂静脉阻塞筛查和分类中的应用。

Comparison of computed tomography venography and intravascular ultrasound in screening and classification of iliac vein obstruction in patients with chronic venous disease.

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, Dante Pazzanese Cardiovascular Institute, São Paulo, Brazil.

Division of Radiology, Dante Pazzanese Cardiovascular Institute, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2020 May;8(3):413-422. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.09.015. Epub 2020 Mar 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate power of computed tomography venography (CTV) to identify and characterize iliac vein obstruction (IVO) compared with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) examination in highly symptomatic patients with chronic venous disease (CVD).

METHODS

CVD CEAP C3-6 limbs with visual analog scale for pain score of greater than 3 and/or Venous Clinical Severity Scale of greater than 8 were prospectively investigated with CTV and IVUS examination. The segment of maximum IVO was verified and categorically classified: group I, 0% to 49%; group II, 50% to 79%; and group III, 80% or greater. The CTV's screening power to detect the point and degree of maximum IVO was compared with IVUS.

RESULTS

The CTV point of maximum IVO was 80% in the left limb, 10% in the right limb, 10% bilaterally; 2% in the inferior vena cava; 91% in the common iliac vein (CIV) confluence (41.6% below the CIV confluence, 34.5 at the CIV confluence, and 23.9% above the CIV confluence); 7% at the external iliac vein (kappa index 0.841; P < .001, when compared with IVUS). The distal venous segment considered free of obstruction was above inguinal ligament: 68% (CIV, 47%; external iliac vein, 21%) 32% below the inguinal ligament (common femoral vein, 26%; deep femoral vein, 6%) (kappa index 0.671; P = .023, when compared with IVUS). The power of CTV to detect an IVO of 50% or greater (groups II and III) when compared with IVUS achieved a sensitivity and specificity ratio of 94.0% and 79.2%, respectively. The positive predictive value was 94%, the negative predictive value was 79.1%, accuracy was 86.7% (kappa, 0.733), and interobserver agreement was 92.1% (95% confidence interval, 87.1-97.7; kappa, 0.899).

CONCLUSIONS

CTV is a powerful screening method in determining the precise point of compression and classifying IVO in limbs with symptomatic CVD when compared with IVUS. The prevalence of an obstruction above the iliac vein confluence is significant and should be considered in iliac vein stenting treatment strategy. The tomographic classification system proposed here may help to define the optimum technique of treatment, prognosis, and comparison of outcome results.

摘要

目的

研究计算机断层静脉造影(CTV)在有症状的慢性静脉疾病(CVD)患者中识别和特征化髂静脉阻塞(IVO)的能力,并与血管内超声(IVUS)检查进行比较。

方法

前瞻性研究了视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分大于 3 和/或静脉临床严重程度评分(VCSS)大于 8 的 CVD CEAP C3-6 肢体的 CTV 和 IVUS 检查。验证并分类了最大 IVO 段:I 组,0%-49%;II 组,50%-79%;III 组,80%或更高。CTV 筛查检测最大 IVO 点和程度的能力与 IVUS 进行比较。

结果

CTV 左侧肢体最大 IVO 点为 80%,右侧肢体最大 IVO 点为 10%,双侧肢体最大 IVO 点为 10%;下腔静脉最大 IVO 点为 2%;髂总静脉(CIV)汇合处最大 IVO 点为 91%(41.6%位于 CIV 汇合处下方,34.5%位于 CIV 汇合处,23.9%位于 CIV 汇合处上方);髂外静脉最大 IVO 点为 7%(kappa 指数 0.841;P<.001,与 IVUS 比较)。认为无阻塞的远端静脉段位于腹股沟韧带上方:CIV 为 68%(47%;髂外静脉为 21%),腹股沟韧带下方为 32%(股总静脉为 26%;股深静脉为 6%)(kappa 指数 0.671;P=0.023,与 IVUS 比较)。CTV 检测 IVO 为 50%或更高(II 组和 III 组)时的效能与 IVUS 相比,灵敏度和特异性分别为 94.0%和 79.2%。阳性预测值为 94%,阴性预测值为 79.1%,准确性为 86.7%(kappa,0.733),观察者间一致性为 92.1%(95%置信区间,87.1-97.7;kappa,0.899)。

结论

CTV 是一种强大的筛查方法,可确定有症状 CVD 肢体的精确压迫点,并对 IVO 进行分类,与 IVUS 相比。在髂静脉汇合处上方存在阻塞的发生率很高,在髂静脉支架置入治疗策略中应予以考虑。这里提出的断层分类系统可能有助于确定最佳的治疗技术、预后,并比较结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验