Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Aug;27(8):2888-2901. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08350-8. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
The objective of the current study was to assess the impact of serum CA19-9 and CEA and their combination on survival among patients undergoing surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).
Patients who underwent curative-intent resection of ICC between 1990 and 2016 were identified using a multi-institutional database. Patients were categorized into four groups based on combinations of serum CA19-9 and CEA (low vs. high). Factors associated with 1-year mortality after hepatectomy were examined.
Among 588 patients, 5-year OS was considerably better among patients with low CA19-9/low CEA (54.5%) compared with low CA19-9/high CEA (14.6%), high CA19-9/low CEA (10.0%), or high CA19-9/high CEA (0%) (P < 0.001). No difference in 1-year OS existed between patients who had either high CA19-9 (high CA19-9/low CEA: 70.4%) or high CEA levels (low CA19-9/high CEA: 72.5%) (P = 0.92). Although patients with the most favorable tumor marker profile (low CA19-9/low CEA) had the best 1-year survival (87.9%), 15.1% (n = 39) still died within a year of surgery. Among patients with low CA19-9/low CEA, a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (odds ratio 1.09; 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.64) and large size tumor (odds ratio 3.34; 95% confidence interval 1.40-8.10) were associated with 1-year mortality (P < 0.05).
Patients with either a high CA19-9 and/or high CEA had poor 1-year survival. High NLR and large tumor size were associated with a greater risk of 1-year mortality among patients with favorable tumor marker profile.
本研究旨在评估血清 CA19-9 和 CEA 及其联合检测对行肝内胆管癌(ICC)切除术患者生存的影响。
使用多机构数据库确定了 1990 年至 2016 年间接受 ICC 根治性切除术的患者。根据血清 CA19-9 和 CEA 的组合(低 vs. 高)将患者分为四组。检查了肝切除术后 1 年死亡率的相关因素。
在 588 例患者中,低 CA19-9/低 CEA 组(54.5%)5 年 OS 明显优于低 CA19-9/高 CEA 组(14.6%)、高 CA19-9/低 CEA 组(10.0%)或高 CA19-9/高 CEA 组(0%)(P<0.001)。高 CA19-9(高 CA19-9/低 CEA 组:70.4%)或高 CEA 水平(低 CA19-9/高 CEA 组:72.5%)患者 1 年 OS 无差异(P=0.92)。尽管具有最有利的肿瘤标志物谱(低 CA19-9/低 CEA)的患者具有最佳的 1 年生存率(87.9%),但仍有 15.1%(n=39)在手术后 1 年内死亡。在低 CA19-9/低 CEA 患者中,高中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)(比值比 1.09;95%置信区间 1.03-1.64)和大肿瘤大小(比值比 3.34;95%置信区间 1.40-8.10)与 1 年死亡率相关(P<0.05)。
CA19-9 和/或 CEA 升高的患者 1 年生存率差。高 NLR 和大肿瘤大小与具有有利肿瘤标志物谱的患者 1 年死亡率增加相关。