• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

名字里有什么?驾驶员对五种 SAE 级别 2 驾驶自动化系统的使用看法。

What's in a name? Drivers' perceptions of the use of five SAE Level 2 driving automation systems.

机构信息

Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, 1005 N Glebe Rd, Suite 800, Arlington, VA 22201, United States.

出版信息

J Safety Res. 2020 Feb;72:145-151. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.11.005. Epub 2019 Dec 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.jsr.2019.11.005
PMID:32199557
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Automobile manufacturers are developing increasingly sophisticated driving automation systems. Currently, the highest level of automation available on the market is SAE Level 2, which provides sustained assistance for both lateral and longitudinal vehicle control. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how drivers' perceptions of what behaviors secondary to driving are safe while a Level 2 system is operating vary by system name.

METHODS

A nationally representative telephone survey of 2005 drivers was conducted in 2018 with questions about behaviors respondents perceived as safe while a Level 2 driving automation system is in operation. Each respondent was asked about two out of five system names at random for a balanced study design.

RESULTS

The name "Autopilot" was associated with the highest likelihood that drivers believed a behavior was safe while in operation, for every behavior measured. There was less variation observed among the other four SAE Level 2 system names when compared with each other. A limited proportion of drivers had experience with advanced driver assistance systems and fewer of these reported driving a vehicle in which Level 2 systems were available. Drivers reported that they would consult a variety of sources for information on how to use a Level 2 system.

CONCLUSIONS

The names of SAE Level 2 driving automation systems influence drivers' perceptions of how to use them, and the name "Autopilot" was associated with the strongest effect. While a name alone cannot properly instruct drivers on how to use a system, it is a piece of information and must be considered so that drivers are not misled about the correct usage of these systems. Practical Applications: Manufacturers, suppliers, and organizations regulating or evaluating SAE Level 2 automated driving systems should ensure that systems are named so as not to mislead drivers about their safe use.

摘要

简介

汽车制造商正在开发越来越先进的驾驶自动化系统。目前,市场上可提供的最高自动化级别是 SAE 级别 2,它为车辆的横向和纵向控制提供持续的辅助。本研究旨在评估驾驶员对在 SAE 级别 2 系统运行时哪些次要驾驶行为是安全的看法因系统名称而异。

方法

2018 年对 2005 名驾驶员进行了一项全国代表性的电话调查,问题是关于驾驶员在 SAE 级别 2 驾驶自动化系统运行时感知到的安全行为。为了平衡研究设计,每个受访者随机被问到五个系统名称中的两个。

结果

在测量的每种行为中,“自动驾驶”这个名称与驾驶员认为行为安全的可能性最高相关。与其他四个 SAE 级别 2 系统名称相比,其他四个名称之间观察到的变化较小。只有有限比例的驾驶员有先进驾驶员辅助系统的经验,其中更少的人报告驾驶过配备有 SAE 级别 2 系统的车辆。驾驶员报告说,他们会从各种来源查询有关如何使用 SAE 级别 2 系统的信息。

结论

SAE 级别 2 驾驶自动化系统的名称影响驾驶员对如何使用它们的看法,而“自动驾驶”这个名称的影响最大。虽然一个名称本身并不能正确指导驾驶员如何使用系统,但它是一条信息,必须予以考虑,以免驾驶员对这些系统的正确使用产生误解。

实际应用

制造商、供应商和监管或评估 SAE 级别 2 自动化驾驶系统的组织应确保系统的命名不会误导驾驶员对其安全使用的认识。

相似文献

1
What's in a name? Drivers' perceptions of the use of five SAE Level 2 driving automation systems.名字里有什么?驾驶员对五种 SAE 级别 2 驾驶自动化系统的使用看法。
J Safety Res. 2020 Feb;72:145-151. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.11.005. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
2
Assessing drivers' response during automated driver support system failures with non-driving tasks.通过非驾驶任务评估自动驾驶员支持系统故障期间驾驶员的反应。
J Safety Res. 2017 Jun;61:149-155. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
3
In-vehicle displays to support driver anticipation of traffic conflicts in automated vehicles.车内显示器以支持自动驾驶车辆中驾驶员对交通冲突的预判。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Jan;149:105842. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105842. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
4
Effects of brand and brand trust on initial trust in fully automated driving system.品牌和品牌信任对全自动驾驶系统初始信任的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 May 4;18(5):e0284654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284654. eCollection 2023.
5
Promote or inhibit: An inverted U-shaped effect of workload on driver takeover performance.促进还是抑制:工作量对驾驶员接管性能的倒U形效应。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2020;21(7):482-487. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1804060. Epub 2020 Aug 21.
6
The effect of varying levels of vehicle automation on drivers' lane changing behaviour.不同程度的车辆自动化对驾驶员变道行为的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 21;13(2):e0192190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192190. eCollection 2018.
7
Perceived safety and trust in SAE Level 2 partially automated cars: Results from an online questionnaire.感知到的安全和对 SAE 级别 2 部分自动化汽车的信任:来自在线问卷的结果。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 21;16(12):e0260953. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260953. eCollection 2021.
8
Fatal crash between a car operating with automated control systems and a tractor-semitrailer truck.一辆配备自动控制系统的汽车与一辆半挂牵引车发生致命碰撞。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018;19(sup2):S153-S156. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1532211.
9
Performance of an Additional Task During Level 2 Automated Driving: An On-Road Study Comparing Drivers With and Without Experience With Partial Automation.在自动驾驶级别 2 期间执行额外任务的性能:一项比较具有和不具有部分自动化经验的驾驶员的道路研究。
Hum Factors. 2018 Sep;60(6):778-792. doi: 10.1177/0018720818773636. Epub 2018 May 23.
10
User expectations of partial driving automation capabilities and their effect on information design preferences in the vehicle.用户对部分驾驶自动化功能的期望及其对车辆信息设计偏好的影响。
Appl Ergon. 2020 Jan;82:102969. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102969. Epub 2019 Oct 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Trolleys, crashes, and perception-a survey on how current autonomous vehicles debates invoke problematic expectations.手推车、碰撞与认知——关于当前自动驾驶车辆争论如何引发问题预期的调查
AI Ethics. 2024;4(2):473-484. doi: 10.1007/s43681-023-00284-7. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
2
A conceptual framework for automation disengagements.自动化脱离的概念框架。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 15;14(1):8654. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57882-6.
3
Preface to the Special Issue on Assessment and Effectiveness of Driver Monitoring Systems.前言 驾驶员监控系统的评估与有效性问题专刊
Hum Factors. 2024 Sep;66(9):2161-2165. doi: 10.1177/00187208231206073. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
4
Vigilance Decrement During On-Road Partially Automated Driving Across Four Systems.在四个系统的道路部分自动化驾驶过程中警觉度降低。
Hum Factors. 2024 Sep;66(9):2179-2190. doi: 10.1177/00187208231189658. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
5
Driver Expectations of a Partial Driving Automation System in Relation to Branding and Training.驾驶员对部分驾驶自动化系统的期望与品牌和培训有关。
Hum Factors. 2024 May;66(5):1531-1544. doi: 10.1177/00187208221143024. Epub 2022 Dec 18.