Department of Mechanics and Maritime Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Mechanics and Maritime Sciences, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
J Safety Res. 2020 Feb;72:259-266. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.12.023. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
Rear-end crashes are one of the most frequent crash types in China, leading to significant economic and societal losses. The development of active safety systems - such as Automatic Emergency Braking System (AEBS) - could avoid or mitigate the consequences of these crashes in Chinese traffic situations. However, a clear understanding of the crash causation mechanisms is necessary for the design of these systems.
Manually coded variables were extracted from a naturalistic driving study conducted with commercial vehicles in Shanghai. Quantitative analyses of rear-end crashes and near crashes (CNC) were conducted to assess the prevalence, duration, and location of drivers' off-path glances, the influence of lead vehicle brake lights on drivers' last off-path glance, and driver brake onset, and the influence of off-path glances and kinematic criticality on drivers' response to conflicts.
The results indicate that the Chinese truck drivers in our study rarely engage in distracting activities involving a phone or other handheld objects while driving. Instead, they direct their off-path glances mainly toward the mirrors, and the duration of off-path glances leading to critical situations are shorter compared to earlier analyses performed in Western countries. The drivers also often keep small margins.
Overall, the combination of short time headway with off-path glances directed toward the mirror originates visual mismatches which, associated to a rapid change in the kinematic situation, cause the occurrence of rear-end CNC. When drivers look back toward the road after an off-path glance, a fast response seems to be triggered by lower values of looming compared to previous studies, possibly because of the short time headways. Practical Application: The results have practical implications for the development of driver models, for the design of active safety systems and automated driving, and for the design of campaigns promoting safe driving.
追尾事故是中国最常见的事故类型之一,导致了巨大的经济和社会损失。主动安全系统的发展,如自动紧急制动系统(AEBS),可以避免或减轻中国交通情况下这些事故的后果。然而,为这些系统进行设计需要对事故原因机制有清晰的理解。
从在中国上海进行的一项商用车自然驾驶研究中提取了手动编码变量。对追尾事故和近追尾事故(CNC)进行了定量分析,以评估驾驶员偏离视线的 glances 的频率、持续时间和位置,前车刹车灯对驾驶员最后一次偏离视线 glances 的影响,以及驾驶员刹车启动时间,以及偏离视线 glances 和运动学关键度对驾驶员对冲突的反应的影响。
结果表明,我们研究中的中国卡车司机在驾驶时很少从事涉及手机或其他手持物体的分散注意力的活动。相反,他们主要将偏离视线 glances 转向镜子,并且导致关键情况的偏离视线 glances 的持续时间比在西方国家进行的早期分析要短。驾驶员也经常保持较小的差距。
总的来说,短车间距与转向镜子的偏离视线 glances 的结合会产生视觉不匹配,这与运动学情况的快速变化一起,导致追尾 CNC 的发生。当驾驶员在偏离视线 glances 后回头看路时,与以前的研究相比,较低的逼近值似乎会引发快速反应,这可能是因为短车间距。
这些结果对驾驶员模型的开发、主动安全系统和自动驾驶的设计以及促进安全驾驶的运动设计具有实际意义。