Suppr超能文献

无家可归的急性心肌梗死患者的心血管结局和再住院率。

Cardiovascular Outcomes and Rehospitalization Rates in Homeless Patients Admitted With Acute Myocardial Infarction.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown.

Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

出版信息

Mayo Clin Proc. 2020 Apr;95(4):660-668. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.01.013. Epub 2020 Mar 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the in-hospital outcomes and 30-day readmission data in homeless patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

METHODS

Adult patients (>18 years of age) who were admitted with AMI between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2016, were identified in the National Readmission Database. Patients were classified into homeless or non-homeless. Baseline characteristics, rates of invasive assessment and revascularization, mortality, 30-day readmission rates, and reasons for readmission were compared between the 2 cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 3938 of 1,100,241 (0.4%) index hospitalizations for AMI involved homeless patients. Compared with non-homeless patients, homeless patients were younger (mean age, 57±10 years vs 68±14 years; P<.001) and had a lower prevalence of atherosclerotic risk factors (hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes) but a higher prevalence of anxiety, depression, and substance abuse. Homeless patients were less likely to undergo coronary angiography (38.1% vs 54%; P<.001), percutaneous coronary intervention (24.1% vs 38.7%; P<.001), or coronary artery bypass grafting (4.9% vs 6.7%; P<.001). Among patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention, bare-metal stent use was higher in homeless patients (34.6% vs 12.1%; P<.001). After propensity score matching, homeless patients had similar mortality but higher rates of acute kidney injury, discharge to an intermediate care facility or against medical advice, and longer hospitalizations. Thirty-day readmission rates were significantly higher in homeless patients (22.5% vs 10%; P<.001). Homeless patients had more readmissions for psychiatric causes (18.0% vs 2.0%; P<.001).

CONCLUSION

Considerable differences in cardiovascular risk profile, in-hospital care, and rehospitalization rates were observed in the homeless compared with non-homeless cohort with AMI. Measures to remove the health care barriers and disparities are needed.

摘要

目的

研究无家可归者因急性心肌梗死(AMI)住院的院内结局和 30 天再入院数据。

方法

在国家再入院数据库中,确定了 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 12 月 31 日期间因 AMI 入院的成年患者(>18 岁)。将患者分为无家可归者或非无家可归者。比较两组患者的基线特征、侵入性评估和血运重建率、死亡率、30 天再入院率和再入院原因。

结果

1100241 例 AMI 指数住院中有 3938 例(0.4%)涉及无家可归者。与非无家可归者相比,无家可归者年龄更小(平均年龄,57±10 岁 vs 68±14 岁;P<.001),且动脉粥样硬化危险因素(高血压、高血脂和糖尿病)患病率较低,但焦虑、抑郁和物质滥用患病率较高。无家可归者行冠状动脉造影(38.1% vs 54%;P<.001)、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(24.1% vs 38.7%;P<.001)或冠状动脉旁路移植术(4.9% vs 6.7%;P<.001)的可能性较低。在接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者中,无家可归者使用裸金属支架的比例较高(34.6% vs 12.1%;P<.001)。在倾向评分匹配后,无家可归者的死亡率相似,但急性肾损伤、出院至中级护理机构或违背医嘱以及住院时间更长的发生率较高。30 天再入院率在无家可归者中显著较高(22.5% vs 10%;P<.001)。无家可归者因精神科原因再入院的比例较高(18.0% vs 2.0%;P<.001)。

结论

与非无家可归者 AMI 患者相比,无家可归者在心血管风险状况、院内治疗和再入院率方面存在显著差异。需要采取措施消除医疗保健障碍和差距。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验