Suppr超能文献

韩国双相情感障碍药物治疗算法项目(KMAP-BP):16年间及五个版本中首选治疗策略和药物的变化

The Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Bipolar Disorder (KMAP-BP): Changes in preferred treatment strategies and medications over 16 years and five editions.

作者信息

Jon Duk-In, Woo Young Sup, Seo Jeong-Seok, Lee Jung Goo, Jeong Jong-Hyun, Kim Won, Shin Young Chul, Min Kyung Joon, Yoon Bo-Hyun, Bahk Won-Myong

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, Korea.

Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Bipolar Disord. 2020 Aug;22(5):461-471. doi: 10.1111/bdi.12902. Epub 2020 Apr 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Korean Medication Algorithm Project for Bipolar Disorder (KMAP-BP) is based on expert consensus and has been revised five times since 2002. This study evaluated the changes in treatment strategies advocated by the KMAP-BP over time.

METHODS

The five editions of the KMAP-BP were reviewed, and the recommendations of the KMAP-BP were compared with those of other bipolar disorder (BP) treatment guidelines.

RESULTS

The most preferred option for the initial treatment of mania was a combination of a mood stabilizer (MS) and an atypical antipsychotic (AAP). Either MS or AAP monotherapy was also considered a first-line strategy for mania, but not for all types of episodes, including mixed/psychotic mania. In general, although lithium and valproic acid were commonly recommended, valproic acid has been increasingly preferred for all phases of BP. The most notable changes over time included the increasing preference for AAPs for all phases of BP, and lamotrigine for the depressive and maintenance phases. The use of antidepressants for BP has gradually decreased, but still represents a first-line option for severe and psychotic depression.

CONCLUSIONS

In general, the recommended strategies of the KMAP-BP were similar to those of other guidelines, but differed in terms of the emphasis on rapid effectiveness, which is often desirable in actual clinical situations. The major limitation of the KMAP-BP is that it is a consensus-based rather than an evidence-based tool. Nevertheless, it may confer advantages in actual clinical practice.

摘要

目的

韩国双相情感障碍药物治疗算法项目(KMAP-BP)基于专家共识,自2002年以来已修订五次。本研究评估了KMAP-BP随时间推移所倡导的治疗策略的变化。

方法

回顾了KMAP-BP的五个版本,并将KMAP-BP的建议与其他双相情感障碍(BP)治疗指南的建议进行了比较。

结果

躁狂症初始治疗的首选方案是心境稳定剂(MS)与非典型抗精神病药物(AAP)联合使用。MS或AAP单药治疗也被视为躁狂症的一线策略,但并非适用于所有类型的发作,包括混合性/精神病性躁狂。总体而言,尽管锂盐和丙戊酸通常被推荐,但在双相情感障碍的所有阶段,丙戊酸越来越受到青睐。随着时间的推移,最显著的变化包括在双相情感障碍的所有阶段对AAPs的偏好增加,以及在抑郁和维持阶段对拉莫三嗪的偏好增加。双相情感障碍使用抗抑郁药的情况逐渐减少,但对于重度和精神病性抑郁仍代表一线选择。

结论

总体而言,KMAP-BP推荐的策略与其他指南相似,但在强调快速有效性方面有所不同,而这在实际临床情况中通常是可取的。KMAP-BP的主要局限性在于它是一个基于共识而非基于证据的工具。尽管如此,它在实际临床实践中可能具有优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验