Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA.
Institute of Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Transl Behav Med. 2021 Mar 16;11(2):382-392. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaa024.
The RAINBOW trial demonstrated that an integrated collaborative care intervention was effective for improving weight and depression. This study examined mediation of the treatment effect by a priori specified lifestyle behaviors and cognitive functioning. Participants were randomized to a 12-month integrated intervention (n = 204) or usual care (n = 205). Body mass index (BMI) and 20-item Depression Symptom Check List (SCL-20) were co-primary outcomes (Y). To examine mediation, we assessed (a) the effect of the integrated intervention (X) on lifestyle behaviors (diet and physical activity) and cognitive functioning (problem-solving; M, X→M path a) and (b) the association of these behaviors with BMI and SCL-20 (M→Y path b). Mediation existed if paths a and b were significant or if path a and the product of coefficients test (paths a and b) were significant. Compared with usual care, the intervention led to significant improvements in leisure time physical activity (201.3 MET minutes/week [SD, 1,457.6]) and total calorie intake (337.4 kcal/day [818.3]) at 6 months but not 12 months (path a). These improvements were not significantly associated with improvements in BMI or SCL-20 (path b). However, avoidant problem-solving style score and increased fruit and vegetable intake significantly correlated with improvements in BMI at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Also, increased fruit and vegetable intake, higher dietary quality, and better problem-solving abilities significantly correlated with improvements in SCL-20 at 6 and 12 months. These findings did not support the hypothesized mediation, but suggest lifestyle behaviors and cognitive functioning to target in future intervention optimization.
RAINBOW 试验表明,综合协作护理干预可有效改善体重和抑郁。本研究通过预先指定的生活方式行为和认知功能检查了治疗效果的中介作用。参与者被随机分配到为期 12 个月的综合干预组(n = 204)或常规护理组(n = 205)。体重指数(BMI)和 20 项抑郁症状清单(SCL-20)是共同的主要结局(Y)。为了检验中介作用,我们评估了(a)综合干预(X)对生活方式行为(饮食和体力活动)和认知功能(解决问题;M,X→M 路径 a)的影响,以及(b)这些行为与 BMI 和 SCL-20 的相关性(M→Y 路径 b)。如果路径 a 和 b 显著,或者路径 a 和系数检验的乘积(路径 a 和 b)显著,则存在中介作用。与常规护理相比,干预组在 6 个月时的休闲时间体力活动(201.3 MET 分钟/周[SD,1457.6])和总热量摄入(337.4 kcal/天[818.3])有显著改善,但 12 个月时没有改善(路径 a)。这些改善与 BMI 或 SCL-20 的改善没有显著相关性(路径 b)。然而,回避性解决问题的风格评分和增加水果和蔬菜摄入量分别与 6 个月和 12 个月时 BMI 的改善显著相关。此外,增加水果和蔬菜摄入量、提高饮食质量和改善解决问题的能力与 6 个月和 12 个月时 SCL-20 的改善显著相关。这些发现不支持假设的中介作用,但表明在未来的干预优化中应针对生活方式行为和认知功能。