Suppr超能文献

一项针对儿科队列的新型无滤镜立体视觉测试(BEST)与Randot立体视觉测试的比较。

Comparison of a New, Filter-Free Stereopsis Test (BEST) With the Randot Stereotest in a Pediatric Cohort.

作者信息

Lagstein Oded, Hecht Idan, Anteby Irene

出版信息

J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2020 Mar 1;57(2):129-135. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20200217-01.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the Bernell Evaluation of Stereopsis Test (BEST) (Bernell Corporation, Mishawaka, IN), a new lenticular technology and filter-free test to measure stereopsis in children, and compare it to the Randot Stereotest (Randot) (Stereo Optical, Inc., Chicago, IL).

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of the medical records of children examined at the Center for Pediatric Ophthalmology at Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center from July to November 2018. All children were evaluated with the Randot and BEST in a random order.

RESULTS

The study included 100 children (53% female, 64% orthophoric) with a mean age of 8.52 ± 3.18 years (range: 3.3 to 17.8 years) and mean best corrected visual acuity of 0.178 ± 0.16 logMAR (range: 0 to 0.7 logMAR). The mean BEST stereoacuity was 1.772 ± 0.27 log seconds of arc (arcsec), whereas the mean Randot stereo-acuity was 1.778 ± 0.39 log arcsec (P = .835). The Bland- Altman analysis revealed an overall bias of 0.0073 log arcsec (95% confidence interval: 0.04219 to 0.05679 log arcsec), with limits of agreement of -0.4816 to 0.4962 log arcsec (0.3299 to 3.1347 arcsec). A significant proportional bias was noted because the difference between the tests was significantly larger in higher log arcsec values (t = 5.566, P < .001). Age, gender, strabismus, and visual acuity did not affect the differences between the stereoacuity tests (P > .05). Both tests were influenced by strabismus but not monocular amblyopia.

CONCLUSIONS

BEST stereoacuity measurements were comparable to those of the Randot, with no significant difference in crude values, minimal bias, and narrow limits of agreement. A larger, clinically insignificant variability between tests was noted with lower stereoacuity values, because children achieved better scores with the BEST. The BEST may be a valuable tool in the arsenal of the ophthalmologist. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2020;57(2):129-135.].

摘要

目的

评估贝内尔立体视评估测试(BEST)(贝内尔公司,印第安纳州米沙瓦卡),这是一种用于测量儿童立体视的新型透镜技术且无需滤光片的测试,并将其与兰多立体视测试(Randot)(立体光学公司,伊利诺伊州芝加哥)进行比较。

方法

这是一项对2018年7月至11月在哈达萨 - 希伯来大学医学中心儿科眼科中心接受检查的儿童病历的回顾性研究。所有儿童均以随机顺序接受了兰多测试和BEST测试。

结果

该研究纳入了100名儿童(53%为女性,64%为正视眼),平均年龄为8.52±3.18岁(范围:3.3至17.8岁),平均最佳矫正视力为0.178±0.16 logMAR(范围:0至0.7 logMAR)。BEST测试的平均立体视锐度为1.772±0.27角秒对数(arcsec),而兰多测试的平均立体视锐度为1.778±0.39 log arcsec(P = 0.835)。布兰德 - 奥特曼分析显示总体偏差为0.0073 log arcsec(95%置信区间:0.04219至0.05679 log arcsec),一致性界限为 -0.4816至0.4962 log arcsec(0.3299至3.1347 arcsec)。注意到存在显著的比例偏差,因为在较高的角秒对数(arcsec)值时,两项测试之间的差异明显更大(t = 5.566,P < 0.001)。年龄、性别、斜视和视力并未影响立体视锐度测试之间的差异(P > 0.05)。两项测试均受斜视影响,但不受单眼弱视影响。

结论

BEST测试的立体视锐度测量结果与兰多测试相当,原始值无显著差异,偏差极小,一致性界限较窄。在较低的立体视锐度值时,两项测试之间存在较大但临床意义不显著的变异性,因为儿童在BEST测试中得分更高。BEST可能是眼科医生工具库中的一个有价值的工具。[《小儿眼科与斜视杂志》。2020;57(2):129 - 135。]

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验