Suppr超能文献

肺保护性机械通气策略在儿科急性呼吸窘迫综合征中的应用。

Lung-Protective Mechanical Ventilation Strategies in Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

机构信息

Children's Intensive Care Unit, Department of Pediatric Subspecialties, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.

Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.

出版信息

Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020 Aug;21(8):720-728. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002324.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Reduced morbidity and mortality associated with lung-protective mechanical ventilation is not proven in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome. This study aims to determine if a lung-protective mechanical ventilation protocol in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome is associated with improved clinical outcomes.

DESIGN

This pilot study over April 2016 to September 2019 adopts a before-and-after comparison design of a lung-protective mechanical ventilation protocol. All admissions to the PICU were screened daily for fulfillment of the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference criteria and included.

SETTING

Multidisciplinary PICU.

PATIENTS

Patients with pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome.

INTERVENTIONS

Lung-protective mechanical ventilation protocol with elements on peak pressures, tidal volumes, end-expiratory pressure to FIO2 combinations, permissive hypercapnia, and permissive hypoxemia.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Ventilator and blood gas data were collected for the first 7 days of pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome and compared between the protocol (n = 63) and nonprotocol groups (n = 69). After implementation of the protocol, median tidal volume (6.4 mL/kg [5.4-7.8 mL/kg] vs 6.0 mL/kg [4.8-7.3 mL/kg]; p = 0.005), PaO2 (78.1 mm Hg [67.0-94.6 mm Hg] vs 74.5 mm Hg [59.2-91.1 mm Hg]; p = 0.001), and oxygen saturation (97% [95-99%] vs 96% [94-98%]; p = 0.007) were lower, and end-expiratory pressure (8 cm H2O [7-9 cm H2O] vs 8 cm H2O [8-10 cm H2O]; p = 0.002] and PaCO2 (44.9 mm Hg [38.8-53.1 mm Hg] vs 46.4 mm Hg [39.4-56.7 mm Hg]; p = 0.033) were higher, in keeping with lung protective measures. There was no difference in mortality (10/63 [15.9%] vs 18/69 [26.1%]; p = 0.152), ventilator-free days (16.0 [2.0-23.0] vs 19.0 [0.0-23.0]; p = 0.697), and PICU-free days (13.0 [0.0-21.0] vs 16.0 [0.0-22.0]; p = 0.233) between the protocol and nonprotocol groups. After adjusting for severity of illness, organ dysfunction and oxygenation index, the lung-protective mechanical ventilation protocol was associated with decreased mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.16-0.88).

CONCLUSIONS

In pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome, a lung-protective mechanical ventilation protocol improved adherence to lung-protective mechanical ventilation strategies and potentially mortality.

摘要

目的

与肺保护性机械通气相关的发病率和死亡率降低在儿科急性呼吸窘迫综合征中尚未得到证实。本研究旨在确定儿科急性呼吸窘迫综合征中肺保护性机械通气方案是否与改善临床结局相关。

设计

这是一项采用肺保护性机械通气方案前后对照设计的试点研究。2016 年 4 月至 2019 年 9 月期间,每天对 PICU 所有入院患者进行筛查,以确定是否符合儿科急性肺损伤共识会议标准,并将符合标准的患者纳入研究。

地点

多学科 PICU。

患者

患有儿科急性呼吸窘迫综合征的患者。

干预措施

采用肺保护性机械通气方案,包括峰压、潮气量、呼气末正压与吸入氧分数组合、允许性高碳酸血症和允许性低氧血症等措施。

测量和主要结果

收集儿科急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者前 7 天的呼吸机和血气数据,并将方案组(n=63)和非方案组(n=69)进行比较。在实施方案后,方案组的中位潮气量(6.4 毫升/公斤[5.4-7.8 毫升/公斤]比 6.0 毫升/公斤[4.8-7.3 毫升/公斤];p=0.005)、PaO2(78.1 毫米汞柱[67.0-94.6 毫米汞柱]比 74.5 毫米汞柱[59.2-91.1 毫米汞柱];p=0.001)和氧饱和度(97%[95%-99%]比 96%[94%-98%];p=0.007)更低,呼气末正压(8 厘米水柱[7-9 厘米水柱]比 8 厘米水柱[8-10 厘米水柱];p=0.002)和 PaCO2(44.9 毫米汞柱[38.8-53.1 毫米汞柱]比 46.4 毫米汞柱[39.4-56.7 毫米汞柱];p=0.033)更高,符合肺保护措施。两组间死亡率(10/63[15.9%]比 18/69[26.1%];p=0.152)、无呼吸机天数(16.0[2.0-23.0]比 19.0[0.0-23.0];p=0.697)和 PICU 无天数(13.0[0.0-21.0]比 16.0[0.0-22.0];p=0.233)均无差异。在校正疾病严重程度、器官功能障碍和氧合指数后,肺保护性机械通气方案与死亡率降低相关(调整后的危险比,0.37;95%置信区间,0.16-0.88)。

结论

在儿科急性呼吸窘迫综合征中,肺保护性机械通气方案可提高肺保护性机械通气策略的依从性,并可能降低死亡率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验