Comp Geoffrey B, Silver Benjamin V, Elliott John, Kalnow Andrew
Emergency Medicine, Creighton University School of Medicine/Maricopa Medical Center (Phoenix), Phoenix, USA.
Emergency Medicine, OhioHealth Doctors Hospital, Columbus, USA.
Cureus. 2020 Feb 16;12(2):e7009. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7009.
Introduction Quality improvement projects can help improve clinical practice in an emergency department (ED). However, it is difficult to measure outcomes in rare clinical conditions. We used a simulation program to evaluate a new protocol and workflow in the emergency blood transfusion process as well as provide additional trauma training. To determine if implementing a trauma simulation would help improve the self-reported understanding of the emergency blood transfusion process by both the ED and laboratory staff. Methods Emergency medicine residents and nursing staff participated in a high-fidelity trauma simulation. ED nursing and hospital laboratory staff used the simulation to test a new process for notification and transport of blood within the hospital. All of the participants were provided a four-item Likert scale questionnaire immediately after the training to evaluate their understanding of the ED blood process. Results There was a significant improvement in overall scores based on paired t-tests in the full group (pre 15.0 versus post 17.6, p = 0.0005) and ED group (pre 14.7 versus post 17.8, p = 0.0007) but not in the lab group (pre 15.8 versus post 17.2, p = 0.296). Conclusion Simulation appears to be helpful to evaluate and implement a new ED protocol or workflow.
引言 质量改进项目有助于改善急诊科的临床实践。然而,在罕见临床情况下衡量结果却很困难。我们使用了一个模拟程序来评估急诊输血过程中的新方案和工作流程,并提供额外的创伤培训。以确定实施创伤模拟是否有助于提高急诊科和实验室工作人员对急诊输血过程的自我报告理解。方法 急诊医学住院医师和护理人员参与了一次高保真创伤模拟。急诊科护理人员和医院实验室工作人员利用该模拟测试了医院内血液通知和运输的新流程。所有参与者在培训结束后立即收到一份四项李克特量表问卷,以评估他们对急诊科血液流程的理解。结果 根据配对t检验,全组(培训前15.0分,培训后17.6分,p = 0.0005)和急诊科组(培训前14.7分,培训后17.8分,p = 0.0007)的总分有显著提高,但实验室组没有(培训前15.8分,培训后17.2分,p = 0.296)。结论 模拟似乎有助于评估和实施新的急诊科方案或工作流程。