Ehrl Denis, Brueggemann Alexandra, Broer P Niclas, Koban Konstantin, Giunta Riccardo, Thon Niklas
Department of Hand, Plastic and Aesthetic Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive, Hand and Burn Surgery, Bogenhausen Academic Teaching Hospital, Munich, Germany.
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2020 Apr;81(2):149-157. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1683371. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
An oncologic tumor resection of the scalp can result in complex wounds that result in challenging scalp reconstructions. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of microvascular-based scalp reconstructions (MSR) in oncologic patients and to propose an algorithmic treatment approach. Within a 5-year period, 38 patients having undergone 41 MSR (15 anterolateral thigh (ALT), 15 gracilis muscle (GM), and 11 latissimus dorsi muscle (LDM) flaps) after extensive scalp tumor resections fulfilled inclusion criteria for this study. Malignant skin disease included superficial and/or deep infiltration of the calvarium in 26 and combined intracranial infiltration in 12 patients. In case of bone replacement (24 patients), MSR was done concomitant, otherwise MSR was performed after pathological confirmation of tumor-free margins. LDM flaps were used in cases with defect sizes of 400 to 1250cm , whereas ALT- and GM flaps were chosen for defects ranging from 40 to 350cm . The average length of the pedicle was comparable in ALT- and LDM flaps and longer than in GM flaps. Total flap loss with need for revision surgery and minor donor site morbidity occurred in four and three patients, respectively. Microsurgical reconstruction of moderate-to-extensive scalp defects remains a reliable method with overall low risks and satisfactory aesthetic results, while, according to our experience, muscle flaps show the best functional and aesthetic results. However, in cases of central scalp defects and in situations when a long vascular pedicle of the flap is important, the ALT flap seems to be the best solution.
头皮肿瘤切除术可导致复杂伤口,进而带来具有挑战性的头皮重建问题。本研究旨在评估微血管蒂头皮重建术(MSR)在肿瘤患者中的疗效,并提出一种算法化治疗方法。在5年期间,38例患者在广泛的头皮肿瘤切除术后接受了41次MSR(15例采用股前外侧皮瓣(ALT)、15例采用股薄肌皮瓣(GM)、11例采用背阔肌皮瓣(LDM)),符合本研究的纳入标准。恶性皮肤疾病包括26例颅骨浅层和/或深层浸润以及12例合并颅内浸润。在进行骨置换的情况下(24例患者),同时进行MSR,否则在病理证实切缘无肿瘤后进行MSR。缺损面积为400至1250平方厘米的病例采用LDM皮瓣,而缺损面积为40至350平方厘米的病例则选择ALT皮瓣和GM皮瓣。ALT皮瓣和LDM皮瓣的蒂平均长度相当,且长于GM皮瓣。分别有4例和3例患者出现皮瓣完全坏死需要进行修复手术以及供区轻度并发症。中到大面积头皮缺损的显微外科重建仍然是一种可靠的方法,总体风险较低且美学效果令人满意,而根据我们的经验,肌皮瓣显示出最佳的功能和美学效果。然而,对于中央头皮缺损的病例以及皮瓣需要长血管蒂的情况,ALT皮瓣似乎是最佳解决方案。