Gothro Andrew, Hanno Elías S, Bradley M C
Mathematica Policy Research, Washington, DC, USA.
Mathematica Policy Research, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Eval Rev. 2022 Feb;46(1):10-31. doi: 10.1177/0193841X20911527. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
This case study discusses two federal grant initiatives and the evaluation technical assistance (ETA) provided to the grantees. One program is a multiphase program funded by the Children's Bureau (CB) within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families. The program funded communities interested in preventing homelessness among youth and young adults with child welfare histories. The funder, grantees, and ETA provider call it Youth At-Risk of Homelessness (YARH). Six federal agencies-the U.S. Departments of Education, Health and Human Services, and Labor, the Corporation for National and Community Service, and the Institute for Museum and Library Services-supported the second initiative known as Performance Partnership Pilots for Disconnected Youth (P3). We discuss the programs together as they share common features including a focus on building evidence, a focus on disconnected youth, use of liaisons to work with grantees who are developing interventions and planning or conducting evaluations at the same time, and having the same liaisons provide ETA to both the grantee/service providing group and the local evaluator. The article discusses (1) the grant programs, (2) details about ETA including its funding and provision, (3) details about the success and utilization of ETA, (4) benefits of ETA, and (5) balancing program or initiative requirements and evaluation needs and concludes with (6) thoughts on how to make ETA successful.
本案例研究讨论了两项联邦资助计划以及向受资助者提供的评估技术援助(ETA)。其中一个项目是由美国卫生与公众服务部儿童与家庭管理局内的儿童局(CB)资助的多阶段项目。该项目资助了那些对预防有儿童福利史的青年和年轻成年人无家可归问题感兴趣的社区。资助者、受资助者和ETA提供者将其称为“有无家可归风险的青年”(YARH)。六个联邦机构——美国教育部、卫生与公众服务部、劳工部、国家与社区服务公司以及博物馆与图书馆服务协会——支持了第二项计划,即“脱离联系青年绩效伙伴试点项目”(P3)。我们将这两个项目放在一起讨论,因为它们有共同的特点,包括注重建立证据、关注脱离联系的青年、利用联络人与正在同时开展干预措施制定以及评估规划或实施工作的受资助者合作,并且由相同的联络人向受资助者/服务提供团体以及当地评估人员提供ETA。本文讨论了(1)资助项目,(2)ETA的详细情况,包括其资金和提供方式,(3)ETA的成功与利用情况的详细信息,(4)ETA的益处,(5)平衡项目或计划要求与评估需求,并在结尾给出了(6)关于如何使ETA取得成功的思考。