Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore , Singapore, Singapore.
Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre Singapore , Singapore, Singapore.
Postgrad Med. 2020 May;132(4):346-351. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2020.1745537. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
Compared to clinic blood pressure (BP), sleep-time BP and non-dipping BP pattern are better predictors of target organ damage and cardiovascular sequalae.
In a retrospective study, we determined whether diabetes mellitus (DM) status is associated with high sleep-time BP and non-dipping pattern.
We analyzed 1092 patients who underwent ambulatory BP monitoring between 2015 and 2017 in a tertiary cardiology institution. During a 24-hour period, BP was automatically measured every 15 minutes between 7:00 AM and 11:59 PM and every 30 minutes thereafter.
Compared with the non-DM group (n = 910), the DM group (n = 182) had a higher 24-hour systolic BP (137 ± 17 vs. non-DM, 132 ± 14 mmHg, p < 0.001) and sleep-time systolic BP (132 ± 20 vs. 123 ± 16 mmHg, p < 0.001), and was more likely to exhibit non-dipping (63% vs 42%, p˂0.001). The DM group was also less likely to meet the guideline-recommended target of 120/70 mmHg for the sleep-time BP measured via ambulatory monitoring (22% vs. 34%, p = 0.002). After adjusting for the effects of age, sex, body mass index, smoking, urea, eGFR, previous myocardial infarction, previous percutaneous coronary intervention, previous coronary artery bypass surgery, and previous stroke, DM remained a significant independent predictor of a higher 24-hour systolic BP (coefficient: 2.8, 95% confidence interval: 0.1-5.5, p = 0.042) and higher sleep-time systolic BP (coefficient: 4.2, 95% confidence interval: 1.1-7.3, p = 0.008). There was a trend toward more sleep-time non-dipping BP pattern (odds ratio: 1.4, 95% confidence interval: 1.0-2.0, p = 0.087) in the DM group.
DM is independently associated with suboptimal 24-hour BP control. This association is mainly attributed to a high sleep-time systolic BP.
与诊所血压(BP)相比,睡眠时 BP 和非杓型血压模式是靶器官损害和心血管后果的更好预测指标。
在一项回顾性研究中,我们确定糖尿病(DM)状态是否与高睡眠时 BP 和非杓型模式相关。
我们分析了 2015 年至 2017 年在一家三级心脏病学机构接受动态血压监测的 1092 例患者。在 24 小时期间,BP 自动每 15 分钟测量一次,时间为上午 7:00 至晚上 11:59,此后每 30 分钟测量一次。
与非 DM 组(n=910)相比,DM 组(n=182)24 小时收缩压(137±17 vs.非 DM,132±14mmHg,p<0.001)和睡眠时收缩压(132±20 vs. 123±16mmHg,p<0.001)更高,且更有可能表现出非杓型(63% vs. 42%,p<0.001)。DM 组也不太可能达到通过动态监测测量的睡眠时 BP 的指南推荐目标值 120/70mmHg(22% vs. 34%,p=0.002)。在校正年龄、性别、体重指数、吸烟、尿素、eGFR、既往心肌梗死、既往经皮冠状动脉介入治疗、既往冠状动脉旁路移植术和既往脑卒中后,DM 仍然是 24 小时收缩压更高的显著独立预测因素(系数:2.8,95%置信区间:0.1-5.5,p=0.042)和睡眠时收缩压更高(系数:4.2,95%置信区间:1.1-7.3,p=0.008)。DM 组睡眠时非杓型 BP 模式的趋势更为明显(比值比:1.4,95%置信区间:1.0-2.0,p=0.087)。
DM 与 24 小时 BP 控制不佳独立相关。这种关联主要归因于睡眠时收缩压升高。