Shen Jian, Li Zhi-Ming, He Li-Zhen, Deng Ren-Sheng, Liu Jing-Guang, Shen Yuan-Sheng
Department of Cardiology, Huizhou Municipal Central Hospital, Huizhou, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Aug;96(33):e7807. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007807.
The aim of this study was to evaluate prognostic values of ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) and clinic blood pressure (CBP) in diabetic patients with hypertension. A total of 450 diabetic hypertensive patients without established cardiovascular diseases were enrolled and 416 patients who had finished 12months' follow-up were included in final analysis. Baseline data were collected and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to evaluate prognostic value of ABP and CBP. Compared to those without study endpoints (n = 370), those experienced study endpoints (n = 46) were more elderly and more likely to be male, and had longer hypertension duration (7.0 ± 3.0 years vs. 6.4 ± 2.1 years, P < .05). No significant between-group differences in CBP indices were observed. However, those with study endpoints had significantly higher 24-hour systolic BP (SBP) (134 ± 10 mmHg vs. 128 ± 7 mmHg), nighttime SBP (130 ± 7 mmHg vs. 120 ± 5 mmHg), night/day SBP ratio (0.97 ± 0.09 vs. 0.94 ± 0.08), higher proportion of non-dipping BP pattern (39.1% vs. 31.4%) and higher 24-hour SBP variability. After extensively adjusted for traditional risk factors, nondipping BP pattern and 24-hourSBP, only 24-hour SBP and nighttime SBP remained independently related with cardiovascular outcomes, with hazard ratios and associated 95% confidence interval as 1.53 (1.28-2.03) and 1.50 (1.26-1.89), respectively. Although no independent relationship between BP pattern and cardiovascular outcomes was observed. In summary, in diabetic hypertensive patients without established cardiovascular diseases, baseline 24-hour SBP and nighttime SBP are useful markers for predicting short-term cardiovascular outcomes.
本研究旨在评估动态血压(ABP)和诊室血压(CBP)在糖尿病合并高血压患者中的预后价值。共纳入450例无确诊心血管疾病的糖尿病高血压患者,416例完成12个月随访的患者纳入最终分析。收集基线数据,采用Cox比例风险回归分析评估ABP和CBP的预后价值。与无研究终点者(n = 370)相比,有研究终点者(n = 46)年龄更大、男性比例更高,高血压病程更长(7.0±3.0年 vs. 6.4±2.1年,P <.05)。CBP指标组间无显著差异。然而,有研究终点者的24小时收缩压(SBP)显著更高(134±10 mmHg vs. 128±7 mmHg)、夜间SBP(130±7 mmHg vs. 120±5 mmHg)、夜间/日间SBP比值(0.97±0.09 vs. 0.94±0.08)、非勺型血压模式比例更高(39.1% vs. 31.4%)且24小时SBP变异性更大。在对传统危险因素、非勺型血压模式和24小时SBP进行广泛校正后,仅24小时SBP和夜间SBP仍与心血管结局独立相关,风险比及相关95%置信区间分别为1.53(1.28 - 2.03)和1.50(1.26 - 1.89)。尽管未观察到血压模式与心血管结局之间的独立关系。总之,在无确诊心血管疾病的糖尿病高血压患者中,基线24小时SBP和夜间SBP是预测短期心血管结局的有用指标。