• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重组人促卵泡激素在接受体外受精-胚胎移植患者中的疗效和安全性。

Efficacy and safety of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in patients undergoing fertilization-embryo transfer.

机构信息

The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Reproductive Medicine, Zhengzhou, China.

Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital of Zhejiang University, Reproductive Medicine, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Aging (Albany NY). 2020 Mar 25;12(6):4918-4930. doi: 10.18632/aging.102919.

DOI:10.18632/aging.102919
PMID:32209728
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7138541/
Abstract

To compare the ovarian responses after administration of two recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (r-FSH) preparations under gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue downregulation, we conducted a phase 3, randomized, multicenter, assessor-blind, active-controlled, parallel group study. The primary outcome was the number of oocytes retrieved. The secondary outcomes included total dose and duration of r-FSH administered, oocyte quality, blood estradiol levels, follicular development, fertilization rates, implantation rates, and pregnancy rates (biochemical, clinical, and ongoing). A total of 451 patients with infertility were randomized to receive either Follitrope™ Prefilled Syringe or Gonal-F Pen for ovarian stimulation. The mean number of oocytes retrieved was 14.9 in the Follitrope Prefilled Syringe group, and 12.8 in the Gonal-F Pen group. The 95% confidence interval in the oocyte number difference between the groups was [-0.1, 4.2], demonstrating that Follitrope Prefilled Syringe was not inferior to Gonal-F Pen. The clinical pregnancy rates (Follitrope Prefilled Syringe vs. Gonal-F Pen: 55.4% vs. 51.9%) and ongoing pregnancy rates (44.1% vs. 43.0%) were similar between the groups. No clinically significant adverse events were observed in either group. In summary, our study indicates that Follitrope Prefilled Syringe is safe and efficacious for ovarian stimulation.

摘要

为了比较在 GnRH 类似物下调后两种重组卵泡刺激素(r-FSH)制剂给药后的卵巢反应,我们进行了一项 3 期、随机、多中心、评估者盲、活性对照、平行组研究。主要结局指标是取回的卵母细胞数量。次要结局指标包括 r-FSH 的总剂量和使用时间、卵母细胞质量、血液雌二醇水平、卵泡发育、受精率、着床率和妊娠率(生化、临床和持续)。共有 451 名不孕患者被随机分配接受 Follitrope™预充注射器或 Gonal-F Pen 进行卵巢刺激。Follitrope 预充注射器组的平均取卵数为 14.9 个,Gonal-F Pen 组为 12.8 个。两组之间的卵母细胞数量差异的 95%置信区间为[-0.1, 4.2],表明 Follitrope 预充注射器并不劣于 Gonal-F Pen。临床妊娠率(Follitrope 预充注射器与 Gonal-F Pen:55.4% vs. 51.9%)和持续妊娠率(44.1% vs. 43.0%)在两组之间相似。两组均未观察到临床意义上的不良事件。总之,我们的研究表明,Follitrope 预充注射器用于卵巢刺激是安全有效的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e595/7138541/5ee9bdfdf1d1/aging-12-102919-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e595/7138541/bfd419c08d12/aging-12-102919-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e595/7138541/5ee9bdfdf1d1/aging-12-102919-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e595/7138541/bfd419c08d12/aging-12-102919-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e595/7138541/5ee9bdfdf1d1/aging-12-102919-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone in patients undergoing fertilization-embryo transfer.重组人促卵泡激素在接受体外受精-胚胎移植患者中的疗效和安全性。
Aging (Albany NY). 2020 Mar 25;12(6):4918-4930. doi: 10.18632/aging.102919.
2
Recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and recombinant luteinizing hormone versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone alone during GnRH antagonist ovarian stimulation in patients aged ≥35 years: a randomized controlled trial.重组卵泡刺激素和重组促黄体生成素联合 GnRH 拮抗剂方案与单独使用重组卵泡刺激素方案在年龄≥35 岁患者卵巢刺激中的随机对照研究。
Hum Reprod. 2015 May;30(5):1188-95. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev038. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
3
A double-blind, randomized study to compare recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (FSH; Gonal-F) with highly purified urinary FSH (Metrodin) HP) in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques including intracytoplasmic sperm injection. The French Multicentre Trialists.一项双盲、随机研究,在接受包括卵胞浆内单精子注射在内的辅助生殖技术的女性中,比较重组人促卵泡激素(FSH;果纳芬)与高度纯化的尿促卵泡素(高纯度美诺孕)。法国多中心试验者。
Hum Reprod. 2000 Mar;15(3):520-5. doi: 10.1093/humrep/15.3.520.
4
Recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (r-hFSH; Gonal-F) versus highly purified urinary FSH (Metrodin HP): results of a randomized comparative study in women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques.重组人促卵泡激素(r-hFSH;果纳芬)与高度纯化的尿促卵泡素(美诺孕):对接受辅助生殖技术的女性进行的一项随机对照研究结果
Hum Reprod. 1997 Oct;12(10):2133-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.10.2133.
5
[Effect of domestic highly purified urinary follicle stimulating hormone on outcomes of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer in controlled ovarian stimulation].国产高纯度尿促卵泡素对控制性卵巢刺激中体外受精-胚胎移植结局的影响
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Nov;48(11):838-42.
6
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of a new recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (DA-3801) with follitropin-alpha (Gonal-F) in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for assisted reproductive technology.新型重组人促卵泡激素(DA-3801)与促卵泡素α(果纳芬)在接受辅助生殖技术控制性卵巢刺激的女性中疗效和安全性的比较
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2007 Jun;33(3):305-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2007.00529.x.
7
A randomized comparison of two ovarian stimulation protocols with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist cotreatment for in vitro fertilization commencing recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone on cycle day 2 or 5 with the standard long GnRH agonist protocol.两种卵巢刺激方案与促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)拮抗剂联合治疗用于体外受精的随机比较,这两种方案分别是在周期第2天或第5天开始使用重组促卵泡激素并与标准长效GnRH激动剂方案进行对比。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003 Jan;88(1):166-73. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-020788.
8
Randomized, active-controlled, comparative phase 3 efficacy and safety equivalence trial of Ovaleap® (recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone) in infertile women using assisted reproduction technology (ART).奥维力普(重组人促卵泡激素)用于采用辅助生殖技术(ART)的不孕女性的随机、活性对照、比较性3期疗效和安全性等效性试验。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2016 Jan 6;14:1. doi: 10.1186/s12958-015-0135-8.
9
Safety and efficacy of Ovaleap® (recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone) for up to 3 cycles in infertile women using assisted reproductive technology: a phase 3 open-label follow-up to Main Study.Ovaleap®(重组人促卵泡激素)在接受辅助生殖技术的不孕女性中使用多达3个周期的安全性和有效性:主研究的3期开放标签随访
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2016 Jun 10;14(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12958-016-0164-y.
10
Nonsupplemented luteal phase characteristics after the administration of recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin, recombinant luteinizing hormone, or gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist to induce final oocyte maturation in in vitro fertilization patients after ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and GnRH antagonist cotreatment.在接受重组促卵泡激素和促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)拮抗剂联合治疗进行卵巢刺激后的体外受精患者中,给予重组人绒毛膜促性腺激素、重组促黄体生成素或GnRH激动剂诱导最终卵母细胞成熟后,未补充黄体期的特征。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003 Sep;88(9):4186-92. doi: 10.1210/jc.2002-021953.

引用本文的文献

1
Ovarian stimulation with follitropin delta for in vitro fertilization: a multicentre, randomized, assessor-blind comparison with follitropin alfa using conventional dosing regimens (ADAPT-1 trial).使用δ-促卵泡素进行体外受精的卵巢刺激:一项多中心、随机、评估者盲法比较,采用传统给药方案与α-促卵泡素进行对比(ADAPT-1试验)
Hum Reprod. 2025 Jul 9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaf119.
2
Biosimilars versus the originator of follitropin alfa for ovarian stimulation in ART: a systematic review and meta-analysis.生物类似药与重组人促卵泡生成素α原研药用于辅助生殖技术中卵巢刺激的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hum Reprod. 2025 Feb 1;40(2):343-359. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae274.
3

本文引用的文献

1
How should we report outcomes in reproductive medicine?我们应该如何报告生殖医学的结果?
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;51(1):7-9. doi: 10.1002/uog.18969.
2
Individualized versus conventional ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a multicenter, randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded, phase 3 noninferiority trial.个体化与传统卵巢刺激用于体外受精:一项多中心、随机、对照、评估者盲法的3期非劣效性试验。
Fertil Steril. 2017 Feb;107(2):387-396.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.10.033. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
3
Randomized, active-controlled, comparative phase 3 efficacy and safety equivalence trial of Ovaleap® (recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone) in infertile women using assisted reproduction technology (ART).
Comparison of DNA damage in granulosa cells of women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization protocols with the recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormones Corneumon, Gonal-F, Pergoveris and Puregon: a randomized trial.
重组人促卵泡激素Corneumon、果纳芬、佩乐能和普利康用于体外受精方案中控制性卵巢刺激的女性颗粒细胞DNA损伤比较:一项随机试验。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 May;309(5):2107-2114. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07392-7. Epub 2024 Mar 5.
4
Correction: Biosimilar recombinant follitropin alfa preparations versus the reference product (Gonal-F®) in couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.更正:接受辅助生殖技术治疗的夫妇中生物类似物重组促卵泡素α制剂与参比产品(果纳芬®)的比较:系统评价与荟萃分析
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2023 Jul 26;21(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12958-023-01114-5.
5
Effectiveness and Safety of Recombinant Human Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (Follitrope™) in Inducing Controlled Ovarian Stimulation in Infertile Women in Real-World Practice: a Prospective Cohort Study.在真实世界实践中,重组人卵泡刺激素(Follitrope™)在诱导不孕女性控制性卵巢刺激中的有效性和安全性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Reprod Sci. 2023 Sep;30(9):2842-2852. doi: 10.1007/s43032-023-01228-6. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
6
Comparative Assessment of the Structural Features of Originator Recombinant Human Follitropin Alfa Versus Recombinant Human Follitropin Alfa Biosimilar Preparations Approved in Non-European Regions.在非欧洲地区获批的原研重组人促卵泡素 α 与重组人促卵泡素 α 生物类似药制剂的结构特征比较评估。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Jun 17;23(12):6762. doi: 10.3390/ijms23126762.
7
Case Report: Twin Pregnancy Gives Birth to a Girl with Partial Trisomy 21 Mosaicism after Fertilization and Embryo Transfer.病例报告:双胎妊娠经受精和胚胎移植后分娩出一名患有21号染色体部分三体镶嵌型的女婴。
Front Genet. 2022 Feb 3;12:740415. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.740415. eCollection 2021.
8
Biosimilar recombinant follitropin alfa preparations versus the reference product (Gonal-F®) in couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.生物类似重组促卵泡素阿尔法制剂与参照产品(果纳芬®)在接受辅助生殖技术治疗的夫妇中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2021 Apr 2;19(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12958-021-00727-y.
奥维力普(重组人促卵泡激素)用于采用辅助生殖技术(ART)的不孕女性的随机、活性对照、比较性3期疗效和安全性等效性试验。
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2016 Jan 6;14:1. doi: 10.1186/s12958-015-0135-8.
4
Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos?体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射的传统卵巢刺激和单胚胎移植。在利用所有新鲜和冷冻胚胎后,我们需要多少个卵母细胞才能使累积活产率最大化?
Hum Reprod. 2016 Feb;31(2):370-6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev316. Epub 2016 Jan 2.
5
A multi-centre phase 3 study comparing efficacy and safety of Bemfola(®) versus Gonal-f(®) in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF.一项多中心3期研究,比较Bemfola(®)与果纳芬(®)在接受体外受精卵巢刺激的女性中的疗效和安全性。
Reprod Biomed Online. 2015 May;30(5):504-13. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
6
Live birth is the correct outcome for clinical trials evaluating therapy for the infertile couple.临床研究旨在评估治疗不孕夫妇的疗法,活产是正确的研究结果。
Fertil Steril. 2014 May;101(5):1205-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.03.026.
7
Ongoing pregnancy qualifies best as the primary outcome measure of choice in trials in reproductive medicine: an opinion paper.持续性妊娠最适合作为生殖医学试验的主要结局测量指标:观点论文。
Fertil Steril. 2014 May;101(5):1203-4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.03.047.
8
Oocyte number as a predictor for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and live birth: an analysis of 256,381 in vitro fertilization cycles.卵母细胞数量作为卵巢过度刺激综合征和活产预测指标的分析:256381 个体外受精周期。
Fertil Steril. 2014 Apr;101(4):967-73. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.12.026. Epub 2014 Jan 23.
9
Individualization of controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF using ovarian reserve markers: from theory to practice.使用卵巢储备标志物对 IVF 中的控制性卵巢刺激进行个体化:从理论到实践。
Hum Reprod Update. 2014 Jan-Feb;20(1):124-40. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmt037. Epub 2013 Sep 29.
10
National, regional, and global trends in infertility prevalence since 1990: a systematic analysis of 277 health surveys.1990 年以来全球、区域和国家不孕症患病率的趋势:对 277 项健康调查的系统分析。
PLoS Med. 2012;9(12):e1001356. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001356. Epub 2012 Dec 18.