• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国商业健康计划在其专科药物覆盖决策中引用了哪些类型的真实世界证据研究?

What types of real-world evidence studies do U.S. commercial health plans cite in their specialty drug coverage decisions?

机构信息

Center for the Evaluation of Value and Risk in Health, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020 Oct;29(10):1307-1311. doi: 10.1002/pds.4992. Epub 2020 Mar 25.

DOI:10.1002/pds.4992
PMID:32212282
Abstract

PURPOSE

To examine the RWE U.S. commercial health plans cite in their specialty drug coverage decisions.

METHODS

We used the Tufts Medical Center Specialty Drug Evidence and Coverage Database to identify specialty drug coverage decisions (n = 7267) issued by 17 large commercial health plans. We categorized the clinical evidence plans cited in these coverage decisions (n = 5227) as randomized controlled trials (RCTs), RWE studies, and other clinical studies (studies other than RCT or RWE study). We categorized RWE studies with respect to study type, for example, case series, studies based on medical records, and so on. We compared the frequency that plans cited different categories of RWE, cited RWE for different diseases, and cited RWE for drugs on the market for different time periods.

RESULTS

RWE comprised 16% of cited clinical studies. Health plans cited RWE with different frequencies (5%-31% of the cited clinical evidence). Overall, plans cited RWE categorized as medical records most often (26% of cited RWE studies). Plans varied in the frequency they cited different RWE categories. Plans most frequently cited RWE for gastroenterological diseases (35% of clinical study citations) and least frequently for respiratory diseases (11% of clinical study citations). Plans cited RWE more for drugs that have long been on the market.

CONCLUSIONS

Health plans varied with respect to the number and types of RWE studies they cited in their specialty drug coverage decisions. Plans cited RWE more often for some diseases than others, and cited more RWE for older drugs.

摘要

目的

考察美国商业健康计划在其专科药物覆盖决策中引用的真实世界证据。

方法

我们使用塔夫茨医疗中心专科药物证据和覆盖数据库,确定了 17 家大型商业健康计划发布的 7267 项专科药物覆盖决策。我们将这些覆盖决策中引用的临床证据(n=5227)分为随机对照试验(RCT)、真实世界证据研究和其他临床研究(除 RCT 或真实世界证据研究外的研究)。我们按照研究类型对真实世界证据研究进行了分类,例如病例系列、基于病历的研究等。我们比较了计划引用不同类别的真实世界证据、为不同疾病引用真实世界证据以及为市场上不同时间段的药物引用真实世界证据的频率。

结果

真实世界证据占引用临床研究的 16%。健康计划引用真实世界证据的频率不同(引用临床证据的 5%-31%)。总体而言,计划引用的真实世界证据大多归类为病历(引用的真实世界证据研究的 26%)。计划引用不同类别的真实世界证据的频率不同。计划最常引用胃肠疾病的真实世界证据(35%的临床研究引用),最不常引用呼吸疾病的真实世界证据(11%的临床研究引用)。计划引用市场上长期存在的药物的真实世界证据更多。

结论

健康计划在其专科药物覆盖决策中引用的真实世界证据研究的数量和类型存在差异。计划对某些疾病引用的真实世界证据比其他疾病更多,对更老的药物引用的真实世界证据更多。

相似文献

1
What types of real-world evidence studies do U.S. commercial health plans cite in their specialty drug coverage decisions?美国商业健康计划在其专科药物覆盖决策中引用了哪些类型的真实世界证据研究?
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020 Oct;29(10):1307-1311. doi: 10.1002/pds.4992. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
2
Variation in health plan coverage of ESAs for anemia due to chronic kidney disease.由于慢性肾脏病导致的贫血症,各种健康计划对 ESA 的覆盖范围存在差异。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Sep;27(9):1221-1229. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.9.1221.
3
Discrepancies Between FDA-Required Labeling and Evidence that Payers Cite in Drug Coverage Policies.FDA 要求的标签与支付方在药物覆盖政策中引用的证据之间的差异。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Dec;24(12):1240-1246. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.12.1240.
4
Is Real-World Evidence Used in P&T Monographs and Therapeutic Class Reviews?真实世界证据是否用于 P&T 专论和治疗类别审查?
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2017 Jun;23(6):613-620. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2017.16368. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
5
Variation in US private health plans' coverage of orphan drugs.美国私人健康保险计划对罕见病药物覆盖范围的差异。
Am J Manag Care. 2019 Oct;25(10):508-512.
6
Is Real-World Evidence Used in P&T Monographs and Therapeutic Class Reviews?是否在药品评审和支付管理专论及治疗类别审查中使用真实世界证据?
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2020 Dec;26(12):1604-1611. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.12.1604.
7
Characterizing health plan evidence review practices.描述健康计划证据审查实践。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Sep;28(9):1053-1058. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.9.1053.
8
Examining US commercial health plans' use of The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review's reports in specialty drug coverage decisions.考察美国商业健康计划在专科药物覆盖决策中使用临床与经济评论学会报告的情况。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 Mar;29(3):257-264. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.3.257.
9
Use of prescriber requirements among US commercial health plans.美国商业健康计划中的处方要求使用情况。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Dec;27(12):1757-1762. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.12.1757.
10
US commercial health plan coverage dynamics in pulmonary arterial hypertension therapies.美国商业健康计划在肺动脉高压治疗中的覆盖动态。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Jun;30(6):541-548. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.6.541.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of health technology assessments in specialty drug coverage decisions by US commercial health plans.美国商业健康保险计划在专科药物覆盖范围决策中对健康技术评估的使用。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2025 Mar;31(3):289-295. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2025.31.3.289.
2
Characterizing health plan evidence review practices.描述健康计划证据审查实践。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Sep;28(9):1053-1058. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.28.9.1053.
3
Patients' access to rare neuromuscular disease therapies varies across US private insurers.美国私人保险公司对罕见神经肌肉疾病治疗方法的患者可及性存在差异。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022 Feb 5;17(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02182-3.
4
Variation in health plan coverage of ESAs for anemia due to chronic kidney disease.由于慢性肾脏病导致的贫血症,各种健康计划对 ESA 的覆盖范围存在差异。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2021 Sep;27(9):1221-1229. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.9.1221.