Suppr超能文献

经颅磁刺激治疗疼痛、头痛和共病性抑郁:INS-NANS 专家共识小组的审查和建议。

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Pain, Headache, and Comorbid Depression: INS-NANS Expert Consensus Panel Review and Recommendation.

机构信息

Professor of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Center for Pain Medicine, University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Director, Center for Pain and Headache Research, VA San Diego Healthcare System, La Jolla, CA, USA.

出版信息

Neuromodulation. 2020 Apr;23(3):267-290. doi: 10.1111/ner.13094. Epub 2020 Mar 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

While transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been studied for the treatment of psychiatric disorders, emerging evidence supports its use for pain and headache by stimulating either motor cortex (M1) or dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). However, its clinical implementation is hindered due to a lack of consensus in the quality of clinical evidence and treatment recommendation/guideline(s). Thus, working collaboratively, this multinational multidisciplinary expert panel aims to: 1) assess and rate the existing outcome evidence of TMS in various pain/headache conditions; 2) provide TMS treatment recommendation/guidelines for the evaluated conditions and comorbid depression; and 3) assess the cost-effectiveness and technical issues relevant to the long-term clinical implementation of TMS for pain and headache.

METHODS

Seven task groups were formed under the guidance of a 5-member steering committee with four task groups assessing the utilization of TMS in the treatment of Neuropathic Pain (NP), Acute Pain, Primary Headache Disorders, and Posttraumatic Brain Injury related Headaches (PTBI-HA), and remaining three assessing the treatment for both pain and comorbid depression, and the cost-effectiveness and technological issues relevant to the treatment.

RESULTS

The panel rated the overall level of evidence and recommendability for clinical implementation of TMS as: 1) high and extremely/strongly for both NP and PTBI-HA respectively; 2) moderate for postoperative pain and migraine prevention, and recommendable for migraine prevention. While the use of TMS for treating both pain and depression in one setting is clinically and financially sound, more studies are required to fully assess the long-term benefit of the treatment for the two highly comorbid conditions, especially with neuronavigation.

CONCLUSIONS

After extensive literature review, the panel provided recommendations and treatment guidelines for TMS in managing neuropathic pain and headaches. In addition, the panel also recommended more outcome and cost-effectiveness studies to assess the feasibility of the long-term clinical implementation of the treatment.

摘要

背景

经颅磁刺激(TMS)已被用于治疗精神疾病,而越来越多的证据表明,刺激运动皮层(M1)或背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)也可用于治疗疼痛和头痛。然而,由于缺乏临床证据质量和治疗推荐/指南的共识,其临床应用受到限制。因此,这个多国家、多学科的专家小组共同合作,旨在:1)评估和评估 TMS 在各种疼痛/头痛疾病中的现有结果证据;2)为评估的疾病和共病性抑郁症提供 TMS 治疗建议/指南;3)评估与 TMS 长期临床应用相关的成本效益和技术问题,用于治疗疼痛和头痛。

方法

在一个由 5 名成员组成的指导委员会的指导下,成立了 7 个工作组,其中 4 个工作组评估 TMS 在治疗神经性疼痛(NP)、急性疼痛、原发性头痛障碍和创伤性脑损伤相关头痛(PTBI-HA)中的应用,其余 3 个工作组评估治疗疼痛和共病性抑郁症的情况,以及与治疗相关的成本效益和技术问题。

结果

该小组对 TMS 临床应用的整体证据水平和推荐程度进行了评价:1)NP 和 PTBI-HA 分别为高和极强/强;2)术后疼痛和偏头痛预防为中,偏头痛预防为推荐。TMS 一次用于治疗疼痛和抑郁具有临床和经济意义,但需要更多的研究来充分评估这种治疗对两种高度共病情况的长期益处,特别是在神经导航的情况下。

结论

经过广泛的文献回顾,该小组为 TMS 治疗神经性疼痛和头痛提供了建议和治疗指南。此外,该小组还建议进行更多的结果和成本效益研究,以评估该治疗长期临床应用的可行性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验