Beaton L, Humphris G, Rodriguez A, Freeman R
DHSRU, School of Dentistry, University of Dundee.
Medical School, University of St Andrews.
Community Dent Health. 2020 May 29;37(2):150-160. doi: 10.1922/CDH_00014Beaton11.
To determine the characteristics of community-based oral health interventions for people experiencing homelessness.
A scoping review was conducted, adhering to the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: Scoping Reviews) checklist. A search strategy was developed using MeSH terms and key words, and used to search the following electronic databases: Medline/PubMed, CINAHL, ProQuest Assia, Scopus, Web of Science and PsychNet. Key journals and reference lists were also hand-searched. Two reviewers then read the abstracts of all papers, excluding duplicates and papers that did not meet the eligibility criteria. The reviewers then read to full-texts of the studies to be included in the review.
Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. These studies were predominantly evaluations of community-based dental services or other oral health interventions. Several recommendations were extracted. Interventions should involve co-design with homeless service users; multidisciplinary working, collaboration with dental practitioners, and working with educational establishments. The location of community-based services was also found to be of importance.
This review has highlighted several recommendations, as well as gaps in the literature. These gaps suggest a need for more non-clinical oral health interventions for the homeless population, and a closer look at the role that non-dental practitioners can play in the delivery of oral health care.
确定针对无家可归者的社区口腔健康干预措施的特点。
进行了一项范围综述,遵循PRISMA-ScR(系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目:范围综述)清单。使用医学主题词和关键词制定了检索策略,并用于检索以下电子数据库:Medline/PubMed、CINAHL、ProQuest Assia、Scopus、Web of Science和PsychNet。还对手检关键期刊和参考文献列表。然后,两位评审员阅读了所有论文的摘要,排除了重复项和不符合纳入标准的论文。评审员随后阅读了纳入综述的研究的全文。
18项研究符合纳入标准并被纳入研究。这些研究主要是对基于社区的牙科服务或其他口腔健康干预措施的评估。提取了若干建议。干预措施应包括与无家可归服务使用者共同设计;多学科合作、与牙科从业者合作以及与教育机构合作。还发现基于社区的服务的地点很重要。
本综述突出了若干建议以及文献中的空白。这些空白表明需要为无家可归者提供更多非临床口腔健康干预措施,并更密切地关注非牙科从业者在提供口腔保健方面可以发挥的作用。