Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Brugmann, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Bicêtre Hospital, Paris Sud University, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Mar;35(6):1036-1044. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2020.1740982. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
To evaluate various signal intensity ratios in isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) and to compare their potential in predicting survival with that of the observed-to-expected (O/E) ratio of total fetal lung volume (TFLV) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements. Our second objective was to evaluate the impact of operator's experience in comparing the prediction of postnatal survival by O/E-TFLV.
In 75 conservatively managed CDH fetuses and in 50 who underwent fetoscopic endoluminal tracheal occlusion (FETO), the fetal lung-to-amniotic fluid, lung-to-liver, lung-to-muscle, lung-to-spinal fluid signal intensity ratios, respectively LAFSIR, LLSIR, LMSIR, and LSFSIR, were measured, as was O/E-TFLV. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed and used to compare the various signal intensity ratios with O/E-TFLV in the prediction of postnatal survival. In 72 MRI lung volumes assessed by the referring radiologists in Paris and Lille and secondarily by our expert radiologist in Brussels (M.M.C.) using the same MRI examinations, ROC curves were constructed and used to compare the value of O/E-TFLV determined by the two centers in the prediction of postnatal survival.
In the total cohort of CDH fetuses, O/E-TFLV and LLSIR were predictive of postnatal survival whereas in the conservatively managed group O/E-TFLV, LLSIR, and LMSIR predicted postnatal survival. O/E-TFLV predicted postnatal survival far better than the signal intensity ratios: area under the ROC curve for prediction by O/E-TFLV in the total cohort was 0.866 ( < .001; standard error = 0.031). The area under the ROC curve for prediction of postnatal survival using O/E-TFLV by MRI evaluated at the referral centers was 0.640 ( = 102; standard error = 0.085), and with O/E-TFLV reevaluated by M.M.C., it was 0.872 ( < .001; standard error = 0.061). Pairwise comparison showed a significant difference between the areas under the ROC curves (difference = 0.187, = .012; standard error = 0.075).
In fetuses with CDH with/without FETO, LLSIR was significantly correlated with the prediction of postnatal survival. However, measurement of O/E-TFLV was far better in predicting postnatal outcome. Operator experience in measurement of lung volumes using MRI seem to play a role in the predictive value of the technique.
评估孤立性先天性膈疝(CDH)中的各种信号强度比,并比较它们在预测生存率方面的潜力,与使用磁共振成像(MRI)测量的总胎儿肺体积(TFLV)的观察到的与预期(O/E)比值进行比较。我们的第二个目标是评估操作员经验在比较 O/E-TFLV 对产后生存率的预测中的影响。
在 75 例保守治疗的 CDH 胎儿和 50 例接受胎儿内窥镜腔内气管阻塞(FETO)的胎儿中,分别测量胎儿肺与羊水、肺与肝、肺与肌肉、肺与脊髓液的信号强度比,分别为 LAFSIR、LLSIR、LMSIR 和 LSFSIR,以及 O/E-TFLV。构建受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,并用于比较各种信号强度比与 O/E-TFLV 在预测产后生存率方面的关系。在由巴黎和里尔的放射科医生以及布鲁塞尔的我们的专家放射科医生(M.M.C.)使用相同的 MRI 检查评估的 72 个 MRI 肺体积中,构建 ROC 曲线,并用于比较两个中心确定的 O/E-TFLV 值在预测产后生存率方面的价值。
在 CDH 胎儿的总队列中,O/E-TFLV 和 LLSIR 可预测产后生存率,而在保守治疗组中,O/E-TFLV、LLSIR 和 LMSIR 可预测产后生存率。O/E-TFLV 预测产后生存率的效果远优于信号强度比:总队列中 O/E-TFLV 预测的 ROC 曲线下面积为 0.866( < .001;标准误差= 0.031)。参考中心评估的 MRI 中使用 O/E-TFLV 预测产后生存率的 ROC 曲线下面积为 0.640( = 102;标准误差= 0.085),而由 M.M.C. 重新评估的 O/E-TFLV 的面积为 0.872( < .001;标准误差= 0.061)。两两比较显示 ROC 曲线下面积存在显著差异(差异= 0.187, = .012;标准误差= 0.075)。
在伴有/不伴有 FETO 的 CDH 胎儿中,LLSIR 与预测产后生存率显著相关。然而,O/E-TFLV 的测量在预测产后结果方面要好得多。操作员使用 MRI 测量肺容积的经验似乎在该技术的预测价值中起作用。