Palma-Contreras Andrea, Ansoleaga Elisa
Doctorado en Psicología, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile.
Facultad de Psicología, Universidad San Sebastián, Santiago, Chile.
Cad Saude Publica. 2020 Mar 23;36(3):e00084219. doi: 10.1590/0102-311X00084219. eCollection 2020.
The objective was to analyze the association between psychosocial risk factors, organizational dimensions, workplace violence, and indicators of mental health problems in three Chilean hospitals. A total of 1,023 workers answered a questionnaire, and descriptive, bivariate (chi-square), and multivariate (logistic regression with odds ratio as the measure of association) analyses were performed. Of all the interviewees, 14.7% reported workplace violence. Increased odds of workplace violence were associated with exposure to ISOSTRAIN (OR = 2.32, p = 0.001), effort-reward imbalance (OR = 5.52, p ≤ 0.001), tyrannical leadership (OR = 3.02, p ≤ 0.001), and vulnerability (OR = 1.97, p = 0.010). Workers exposed to ISOSTRAIN (OR = 1.78, p = 0.024), effort-reward imbalance (OR = 2.49, p = 0.001), workplace violence (OR = 2.13, p = 0.003), and vulnerability (OR = 2.29, p = 0.001) showed increased odds of high stress when compared to unexposed workers. Workers exposed to effort-reward imbalance (OR = 2.84, p ≤ 0.001) and workplace violence (OR = 1.76, p = 0.041) showed higher odds of reporting depressive symptoms. Those exposed to effort-reward imbalance (OR = 2.07, p ≤ 0.001) and work vulnerability (OR = 1.96, p = 0.001) showed higher odds of consuming psychoactive drugs. Work contexts with psychosocial risk factors, adverse organizational dimensions, and work vulnerability were associated with higher odds of workplace violence. Workers exposed to workplace violence, psychosocial risks, and vulnerability have higher odds of reporting mental health problems.
目的是分析智利三家医院中心理社会风险因素、组织维度、工作场所暴力与心理健康问题指标之间的关联。共有1023名员工回答了一份问卷,并进行了描述性分析、双变量分析(卡方检验)和多变量分析(以比值比作为关联度量的逻辑回归)。在所有受访者中,14.7%报告曾遭受工作场所暴力。工作场所暴力发生几率的增加与接触ISOSTRAIN(比值比=2.32,p=0.001)、努力-回报失衡(比值比=5.52,p≤0.001)、专制领导(比值比=3.02,p≤0.001)以及易受伤害性(比值比=1.97,p=0.010)相关。与未接触的员工相比,接触ISOSTRAIN(比值比=1.78,p=0.024)、努力-回报失衡(比值比=2.49,p=0.001)、工作场所暴力(比值比=2.13,p=0.003)以及易受伤害性(比值比=2.29,p=0.001)的员工出现高压力的几率增加。接触努力-回报失衡(比值比=2.84,p≤0.001)和工作场所暴力(比值比=1.76,p=0.041)的员工报告抑郁症状的几率更高。接触努力-回报失衡(比值比=2.07,p≤0.001)和工作易受伤害性(比值比=1.96,p=0.001)的员工使用精神活性药物的几率更高。存在心理社会风险因素、不良组织维度和工作易受伤害性的工作环境与工作场所暴力发生几率较高相关。接触工作场所暴力、心理社会风险和易受伤害性的员工报告心理健康问题的几率更高。