Abad Cybele L, Barker Anna K, Safdar Nasia
Department of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, University of the Philippines, Manila-Philippine General Hospital, Manila, Philippines.
Division of Infectious Diseases, The Medical City, Pasig, Philippines.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020 Jun;41(6):691-709. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.45.
Cohorting of patients and staff is a control strategy often used to prevent the spread of infection in healthcare institutions. However, a comprehensive evaluation of cohorting as a prevention approach is lacking.
We performed a systematic review of studies that used cohorting as part of an infection control strategy to reduce hospital-acquired infections. We included studies published between 1966 and November 30, 2019, on adult populations hospitalized in acute-care hospitals.
In total, 87 studies met inclusion criteria. Study types were quasi-experimental "before and after" (n = 35), retrospective (n = 49), and prospective (n = 3). Case-control analysis was performed in 7 studies. Cohorting was performed with other infection control strategies in the setting of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA, n = 22), Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI, n = 6), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE, n = 17), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections (CRE, n = 22), A. baumannii (n = 15), and other gram-negative infections (n = 5). Cohorting was performed either simultaneously (56 of 87, 64.4%) or in phases (31 of 87, 35.6%) to help contain transmission. In 60 studies, both patients and staff were cohorted. Most studies (77 of 87, 88.5%) showed a decline in infection or colonization rates after a multifaceted approach that included cohorting as part of the intervention bundle. Hand hygiene compliance improved in approximately half of the studies (8 of 15) during the respective intervention.
Cohorting of staff, patients, or both is a frequently used and reasonable component of an enhanced infection control strategy. However, determining the effectiveness of cohorting as a strategy to reduce transmission of MDRO and C. difficile infections is difficult, particularly in endemic situations.
对患者和医护人员进行分组是医疗机构中常用的预防感染传播的控制策略。然而,目前缺乏对分组作为一种预防方法的全面评估。
我们对将分组作为感染控制策略的一部分以减少医院获得性感染的研究进行了系统评价。纳入了1966年至2019年11月30日期间发表的关于急性护理医院住院成年人群的研究。
共有87项研究符合纳入标准。研究类型为准实验性“前后”研究(n = 35)、回顾性研究(n = 49)和前瞻性研究(n = 3)。7项研究进行了病例对照分析。在耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA,n = 22)、艰难梭菌感染(CDI,n = 6)、耐万古霉素肠球菌(VRE,n = 17)、耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科感染(CRE,n = 22)、鲍曼不动杆菌(n = 15)和其他革兰氏阴性菌感染(n = 5)的情况下,分组与其他感染控制策略同时实施。分组要么同时进行(87项中的56项,64.4%),要么分阶段进行(87项中的31项,35.6%)以帮助控制传播。在60项研究中,患者和医护人员都进行了分组。大多数研究(87项中的77项,88.5%)表明,在包括分组作为干预措施一部分的多方面方法实施后,感染或定植率有所下降。在各自的干预期间,约一半的研究(15项中的8项)手卫生依从性得到改善。
对医护人员、患者或两者进行分组是强化感染控制策略中常用且合理的组成部分。然而,确定分组作为减少多重耐药菌和艰难梭菌感染传播策略的有效性很困难,尤其是在地方流行情况下。