Suppr超能文献

定量出汗测试有助于区分转甲状腺素蛋白家族性淀粉样多发性神经病与慢性炎症性脱髓鞘性多发性神经病。

Quantitative sudomotor test helps differentiate transthyretin familial amyloid polyneuropathy from chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy.

机构信息

Neuromuscular Disease and ALS Reference Center, Timone University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.

Neuromuscular Disease and ALS Reference Center, Timone University Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.

出版信息

Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 May;131(5):1129-1133. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.01.022. Epub 2020 Feb 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Transthyretin familial amyloid polyneuropathy (TTR-FAP) is an aggressive hereditary neuropathy characterized by sensory and autonomic dysfunction. There are numerous reports of TTR-FAP misdiagnosed and treated as chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), leading to delayed diagnosis, risk of iatrogenic adverse events and increased socio-economic costs. Quantitative sudomotor function measured by electrochemical skin conductance (ESC) appears to be a sensitive test in TTR-FAP. We aimed to evaluate the performance of ESC in differentiating TTR-FAP from CIDP.

METHODS

Thirty-eight patients with genetically confirmed hereditary TTR amyloidosis and 26 with definite CIDP according to the EFNS/PNS guidelines and negative TTR-FAP genetic testing were involved in this study. We compared the ESC for feet and hands measured by Sudoscan for each patient.

RESULTS

ESC (µS) was significantly lower in TTR-FAP for both hands (72 vs 45, p < 0.0001) and feet (77 vs 35, p < 0.0001). Feet ESC < 64 µS had a 89% sensitivity and a 96% specificity to differentiate between CIDP and TTR-FAP.

CONCLUSION

Sudoscan is a fast, non-invasive and easy to perform test, able to distinguish CIDP and TTR-FAP patients with good sensitivity and specificity.

SIGNIFICANCE

Sudoscan can be helpful in distinguishing between CIDP and TTR-FAP.

摘要

目的

转甲状腺素蛋白家族性淀粉样多发性神经病(TTR-FAP)是一种侵袭性遗传性神经病,其特征为感觉和自主神经功能障碍。有大量 TTR-FAP 误诊为慢性炎症性脱髓鞘性多发性神经病(CIDP)的报道,导致诊断延迟、医源性不良事件风险增加和社会经济成本增加。电化学皮肤电导(ESC)测量的定量出汗功能似乎是 TTR-FAP 的一项敏感测试。我们旨在评估 ESC 在区分 TTR-FAP 与 CIDP 方面的性能。

方法

本研究纳入了 38 名经基因证实的遗传性 TTR 淀粉样变性患者和 26 名根据 EFNS/PNS 指南确诊的 CIDP 患者,且 TTR-FAP 基因检测为阴性。我们比较了每位患者的 Sudoscan 测量的手部和足部 ESC。

结果

TTR-FAP 患者的手部(72 对 45,p<0.0001)和足部(77 对 35,p<0.0001)的 ESC(µS)均显著较低。足部 ESC<64 µS 对区分 CIDP 和 TTR-FAP 的敏感性为 89%,特异性为 96%。

结论

Sudoscan 是一种快速、非侵入性且易于进行的测试,能够以良好的敏感性和特异性区分 CIDP 和 TTR-FAP 患者。

意义

Sudoscan 有助于区分 CIDP 和 TTR-FAP。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验