Department of Medicine, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa.
The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa.
Curr Oncol. 2020 Feb;27(1):34-38. doi: 10.3747/co.27.5291. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
Non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc) is the most common cause of cancer deaths worldwide, with a 5-year survival of 17%. The low survival rate observed in patients with nsclc is primarily attributable to advanced stage of disease at diagnosis, with more than 50% of cases being stage iv at presentation. For patients with advanced disease, palliative systemic therapy can improve overall survival (os); however, a recent review at our institution of more than 500 consecutive cases of advanced nsclc demonstrated that only 55% of the patients received palliative systemic therapy. What is unknown to date is whether that observed low rate of systemic therapy in our previous study is uniform across oncologists.
With ethics approval, we performed a retrospective analysis of newly diagnosed patients with stage iv nsclc seen as outpatients at our institution between 2009 and 2012 by 4 different oncologists. Demographics, treatment, and survival data were collected and compared for the 4 oncologists.
The 4 oncologists saw 528 patients overall, with D seeing 115; L, 158; R, 137; and M, 118. Significant variation was observed in the proportion receiving 1 line or more of chemotherapy: D, 60%; L, 65%; R, 43%; and M, 52%. Physician assignment was not associated with a difference in median os, with D's cohort having a median os of 6.8 months; L, 8.4 months; R, 7.0 months; and M, 7.0 months.
Practice size and proportion of patients treated varied between oncologists, but those differences did not translate into significantly different survival outcomes for patients.
非小细胞肺癌(nsclc)是全球癌症死亡的最常见原因,5 年生存率为 17%。在 nsclc 患者中观察到的低生存率主要归因于诊断时疾病的晚期,超过 50%的病例在就诊时为 iv 期。对于晚期疾病患者,姑息性全身治疗可以改善总生存期(os);然而,我们机构最近对 500 多例连续晚期 nsclc 病例的审查表明,只有 55%的患者接受了姑息性全身治疗。迄今为止尚不清楚我们之前的研究中观察到的全身治疗率低是否在肿瘤学家中普遍存在。
在获得伦理批准的情况下,我们对 2009 年至 2012 年期间在我们机构就诊的 4 位不同肿瘤学家的 4 期 nsclc 门诊患者进行了回顾性分析。收集并比较了 4 位肿瘤学家的人口统计学、治疗和生存数据。
这 4 位肿瘤学家总共观察了 528 例患者,D 医生观察了 115 例;L 医生观察了 158 例;R 医生观察了 137 例;M 医生观察了 118 例。接受 1 线或更多化疗的比例存在显著差异:D 医生组为 60%;L 医生组为 65%;R 医生组为 43%;M 医生组为 52%。医生分配与中位 os 无差异相关,D 医生组的中位 os 为 6.8 个月;L 医生组为 8.4 个月;R 医生组为 7.0 个月;M 医生组为 7.0 个月。
肿瘤学家之间的实践规模和治疗患者的比例存在差异,但这些差异并未转化为患者生存结果的显著差异。