• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较美国联邦政府和基金会对镰状细胞病和囊性纤维化研究的资助,以及与研究生产力相关的因素。

Comparison of US Federal and Foundation Funding of Research for Sickle Cell Disease and Cystic Fibrosis and Factors Associated With Research Productivity.

机构信息

Deparment of Pediatrics and Medicine, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, New York.

Division of Pediatric Pulmonology, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e201737. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1737.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1737
PMID:32219405
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Sickle cell disease (SCD) and cystic fibrosis (CF) are severe autosomal recessive disorders associated with intermittent disease exacerbations that require hospitalizations, progressive chronic organ injury, and substantial premature mortality. Research funding is a limited resource and may contribute to health care disparities, especially for rare diseases that disproportionally affect economically disadvantaged groups.

OBJECTIVE

To compare disease-specific funding between SCD and CF and the association between funding and research productivity.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study examined federal and foundation funding, publications indexed in PubMed, clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, and new drug approvals from January 1, 2008, to December 31, 2018, in an estimated US population of approximately 90 000 individuals with SCD and approximately 30 000 individuals with CF.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Federal and foundation funding, publications indexed in PubMed, clinical trial registrations, and new drug approvals.

RESULTS

From 2008 through 2018, federal funding was greater per person with CF compared with SCD (mean [SD], $2807 [$175] vs $812 [$147]; P < .001). Foundation expenditures were greater for CF than for SCD (mean [SD], $7690 [$3974] vs $102 [$13.7]; P < .001). Significantly more research articles (mean [SD], 1594 [225] vs 926 [157]; P < .001) and US Food and Drug Administration drug approvals (4 vs 1) were found for CF compared with SCD, but the total number of clinical trials was similar (mean [SD], 27.3 [6.9] vs 23.8 [6.3]; P = .22).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The findings show that disparities in funding between SCD and CF may be associated with decreased research productivity and novel drug development for SCD. Increased federal and foundation funding is needed for SCD and other diseases that disproportionately affect economically disadvantaged groups to address health care disparities.

摘要

重要性

镰状细胞病(SCD)和囊性纤维化(CF)是严重的常染色体隐性疾病,与间歇性疾病恶化有关,需要住院治疗、进行慢性器官渐进性损伤以及过早死亡。研究资金是一种有限的资源,可能导致医疗保健方面的差距,尤其是对于那些不成比例地影响经济弱势群体的罕见疾病。

目的

比较 SCD 和 CF 之间的疾病特异性资金以及资金与研究生产力之间的关系。

设计、地点和参与者:这项横断面研究调查了 2008 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 12 月 31 日期间联邦和基金会资金、在 PubMed 中索引的出版物、在 ClinicalTrials.gov 中注册的临床试验以及新批准的药物,研究对象为美国约 90000 名 SCD 患者和约 30000 名 CF 患者。

主要结果和措施

联邦和基金会资金、在 PubMed 中索引的出版物、临床试验注册和新批准的药物。

结果

从 2008 年到 2018 年,每例 CF 患者的联邦资金高于 SCD(平均[标准差],$2807 [$175]比$812 [$147];P < .001)。基金会支出 CF 比 SCD 多(平均[标准差],$7690 [$3974]比$102 [$13.7];P < .001)。与 SCD 相比,CF 有更多的研究文章(平均[标准差],1594 [225]比 926 [157];P < .001)和美国食品和药物管理局的药物批准(4 比 1),但临床试验总数相似(平均[标准差],27.3 [6.9]比 23.8 [6.3];P = .22)。

结论和相关性

研究结果表明,SCD 和 CF 之间的资金差距可能与 SCD 研究生产力下降和新药开发减少有关。需要增加 SCD 和其他不成比例地影响经济弱势群体的疾病的联邦和基金会资金,以解决医疗保健差距。

相似文献

1
Comparison of US Federal and Foundation Funding of Research for Sickle Cell Disease and Cystic Fibrosis and Factors Associated With Research Productivity.比较美国联邦政府和基金会对镰状细胞病和囊性纤维化研究的资助,以及与研究生产力相关的因素。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e201737. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1737.
2
The Effect of Structural Violence on Patients with Sickle Cell Disease.结构性暴力对镰状细胞病患者的影响。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2015 Aug;26(3):648-61. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2015.0094.
3
Burden of influenza-related hospitalizations among children with sickle cell disease.镰状细胞病患儿与流感相关的住院负担。
Pediatrics. 2010 Feb;125(2):234-43. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-1465. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
4
Preventive services received by adolescents with cystic fibrosis and sickle cell disease.患有囊性纤维化和镰状细胞病的青少年接受的预防服务。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999 Jan;153(1):27-32. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.153.1.27.
5
Disparities in pediatric hospital use during transition to adult healthcare for young adults with childhood-onset chronic conditions.儿童期起病的慢性病患者在向成人医疗保健过渡期间儿科医院使用的差异。
J Hosp Med. 2024 Jun;19(6):495-504. doi: 10.1002/jhm.13322. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
6
An analysis of the NIH-supported sickle cell disease research portfolio.对美国国立卫生研究院资助的镰状细胞病研究项目组合的分析。
Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2015 Feb;54(2):198-205. doi: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2014.11.001. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
7
The anatomy of medical research: US and international comparisons.医学研究的剖析:美国与国际比较。
JAMA. 2015 Jan 13;313(2):174-89. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.15939.
8
Funding of Parkinson research from industry and US federal and foundation sources.来自行业、美国联邦政府及基金会的帕金森病研究资金。
Mov Disord. 2009 Apr 15;24(5):731-7. doi: 10.1002/mds.22446.
9
Estimated Life Expectancy and Income of Patients With Sickle Cell Disease Compared With Those Without Sickle Cell Disease.估算患有镰状细胞病与不患有镰状细胞病患者的预期寿命和收入。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Nov 1;2(11):e1915374. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15374.
10
Sickle cell disease-related pediatric medical expenditures in the U.S.美国与镰状细胞病相关的儿科医疗支出
Am J Prev Med. 2010 Apr;38(4 Suppl):S550-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.01.004.

引用本文的文献

1
Mortality Rate Trends for Sickle Cell Disease and Cystic Fibrosis in the US.美国镰状细胞病和囊性纤维化的死亡率趋势
JAMA Pediatr. 2025 Sep 8. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2025.2997.
2
Knowledge, Confidence, and Comfort Regarding Sickle Cell Disease Among Medical Students: A Pilot Study in Two Universities.医学生对镰状细胞病的认知、信心与舒适度:在两所大学开展的一项试点研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 5;13(15):1909. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13151909.
3
Can health inequalities in sickle cell disease be addressed through novel therapies?
镰状细胞病中的健康不平等问题能否通过新型疗法得到解决?
Hemasphere. 2025 Jul 10;9(7):e70175. doi: 10.1002/hem3.70175. eCollection 2025 Jul.
4
Accelerated drug approvals and patient trust: impact of voxelotor and crizanlizumab for sickle cell disease.加速药物批准与患者信任:伏索利洛和克瑞扎珠单抗对镰状细胞病的影响
Blood Adv. 2025 Jun 10;9(11):2857-2862. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2025015822.
5
Building Better Medicine: Translational Justice and the Quest for Equity in US Healthcare.打造更优质的医学:转化正义与美国医疗保健中的公平追求
Am J Bioeth. 2025 Jun;25(6):11-25. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2025.2457713. Epub 2025 Feb 23.
6
What's wrong with drug development for sickle cell disease?镰状细胞病的药物研发出了什么问题?
Hemasphere. 2025 Feb 6;9(2):e70082. doi: 10.1002/hem3.70082. eCollection 2025 Feb.
7
Screening for sickle cell disease by point-of-care tests in Italy: pilot study on 1000 at risk children.意大利采用即时检验法筛查镰状细胞病:对1000名高危儿童的试点研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Jan 28;184(2):157. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-05988-y.
8
A Children's Rights Framework for Genomic Medicine: Newborn Screening as a Use Case.儿童基因组医学权利框架:以新生儿筛查为例
Med Res Arch. 2024 Mar;12(3). doi: 10.18103/mra.v12i3.5167. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
9
Pulmonary Function after Nonmyeloablative Hematopoietic Cell Transplant for Sickle Cell Disease.非清髓性造血细胞移植治疗镰状细胞病后的肺功能。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2024 Oct;21(10):1398-1406. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202309-771OC.
10
Budget Impact of Disease-Modifying Treatments and a CRISPR Gene-Edited Therapy for Sickle Cell Disease.用于治疗镰状细胞病的疾病修正治疗和 CRISPR 基因编辑疗法的预算影响。
Clin Drug Investig. 2024 Aug;44(8):611-627. doi: 10.1007/s40261-024-01384-w. Epub 2024 Aug 12.