Suppr超能文献

两种公认安全的表面活性剂和酸化剂可使悬浮液或浸渍接种的葡萄番茄中的沙门氏菌、大肠杆菌 O157:H7 和李斯特菌失活。

Two Generally Recognized as Safe Surfactants plus Acidulants Inactivate Salmonella, Escherichia coli O157:H7, and Listeria monocytogenes in Suspension or on Dip-Inoculated Grape Tomatoes.

机构信息

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Eastern Regional Research Center, Food Safety and Intervention Technologies Research Unit, 600 East Mermaid Lane, Wyndmoor, Pennsylvania 19038-8551, USA (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5844-7794).

出版信息

J Food Prot. 2020 Apr 1;83(4):637-643. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-19-286.

Abstract

ABSTRACT

Contamination of fresh produce with the foodborne pathogens Salmonella enterica, Listeria monocytogenes, and Escherichia coli O157:H7 continues to be problematic, resulting in outbreaks of foodborne illness and costly corporate recalls. Various individual concentrations of citric or lactic acids (0.35 to 0.61%) or isopropyl citrate (0.16 to 0.54%) combined with two generally recognized as safe surfactants, 0.025% sodium-2-ethyl-hexyl sulfate and 0.025% sodium dodecylbenzene-sulfonate, were tested against these three pathogens in suspension and when inoculated and dried on the surface of grape tomatoes. The efficacy of sodium hypochlorite (NaClO; at 46 ppm) was also evaluated under dirty and clean conditions in suspension after addition of 0.3 or 0.03% bovine serum albumin, respectively, as an organic load. NaClO (46 ppm) inactivated the three pathogens in suspension by <0.76 log CFU/mL after 5 min in the presence of 0.3% bovine serum albumin, whereas 9 and 15 ppm of free chlorine inactivated the pathogens by 0.64 and 2.77 log CFU/mL, respectively, after 5 min under clean conditions. Isopropyl citrate (0.16% acidulant) plus 0.05% total concentration of the two surfactants inactivated the pathogens in suspension by up to 7.0 log CFU/mL within 2 min. When applied to grape tomatoes for 2 min, 0.54% isopropyl citrate plus 0.025% concentrations of each of the two surfactants reduced Salmonella, E. coli O157:H7, and L. monocytogenes by as much as ca. 5.47, 4.89, and 4.19 log CFU/g, respectively. These reductions were significantly greater than those achieved with 49 ppm of free chlorine. Citric acid and lactic acid plus surfactant washes achieved greater inactivation than water-only washes, reducing Salmonella, E. coli O157:H7, and L. monocytogenes on tomatoes by up to 4.90, 4.37, and 3.98 log CFU/g, respectively. These results suggest that these combinations of acidulants and surfactants may be an effective tool for preventing cross-contamination during the washing of grape tomatoes, for reducing pathogens on the fruit itself, and as an alternative to chlorine for washing fresh produce.

摘要

摘要

食源性致病菌如沙门氏菌、单增李斯特菌和大肠杆菌 O157:H7 持续污染新鲜农产品,导致食源性疾病爆发和代价高昂的企业召回。分别测试了柠檬酸或乳酸(0.35 至 0.61%)或异丙基柠檬酸(0.16 至 0.54%)与两种公认安全的表面活性剂 0.025%十二烷基硫酸钠和 0.025%十二烷基苯磺酸钠,在悬浮液中和接种并干燥在葡萄番茄表面时对这三种病原体的效果。在添加 0.3 或 0.03%牛血清白蛋白作为有机负荷后,在悬浮液中于脏污和清洁条件下,次氯酸钠(NaClO;46 ppm)的功效也分别进行了评估。在存在 0.3%牛血清白蛋白的情况下,5 分钟内,NaClO(46 ppm)将三种病原体在悬浮液中的活性降低了 <0.76 log CFU/mL,而在清洁条件下,9 和 15 ppm 的游离氯分别将病原体的活性降低了 0.64 和 2.77 log CFU/mL。在 2 分钟内,0.16%异丙基柠檬酸(酸化剂)加上两种表面活性剂的总浓度 0.05%使悬浮液中的病原体失活高达 7.0 log CFU/mL。当应用于葡萄番茄 2 分钟时,0.54%异丙基柠檬酸加上两种表面活性剂的浓度各为 0.025%,分别使沙门氏菌、大肠杆菌 O157:H7 和李斯特菌减少多达约 5.47、4.89 和 4.19 log CFU/g。这些减少量明显大于 49 ppm 游离氯的减少量。柠檬酸和乳酸加表面活性剂清洗比仅用水清洗的效果更好,使番茄上的沙门氏菌、大肠杆菌 O157:H7 和李斯特菌减少多达 4.90、4.37 和 3.98 log CFU/g。这些结果表明,这些酸化剂和表面活性剂的组合可能是防止在清洗葡萄番茄过程中交叉污染、减少水果本身病原体的有效工具,并且是替代氯清洗新鲜农产品的一种选择。

相似文献

5
Efficacy of Peracetic Acid in Inactivating Foodborne Pathogens on Fresh Produce Surface.
J Food Sci. 2018 Feb;83(2):432-439. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.14028. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
7
Efficacy of neutral electrolyzed water (NEW) for reducing microbial contamination on minimally-processed vegetables.
Int J Food Microbiol. 2008 Mar 31;123(1-2):151-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.12.008. Epub 2008 Jan 30.
8
Internalization of bacterial pathogens in tomatoes and their control by selected chemicals.
J Food Prot. 2004 Jul;67(7):1353-8. doi: 10.4315/0362-028x-67.7.1353.

引用本文的文献

1
A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Response to Sanitizer Treatments.
Foods. 2022 Dec 28;12(1):154. doi: 10.3390/foods12010154.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验