• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

压力、湿度和温度对模拟填埋条件下城市固体废物热解的影响及与高温填埋场现场数据的相关性。

The impact of pressure, moisture and temperature on pyrolysis of municipal solid waste under simulated landfill conditions and relevance to the field data from elevated temperature landfill.

机构信息

Chemical Engineering Department, The City College of New York, CUNY, New York, NY 10031, United States of America.

Chemical Engineering Department, The City College of New York, CUNY, New York, NY 10031, United States of America.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2020 Jun 25;723:138031. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138031. Epub 2020 Mar 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138031
PMID:32222504
Abstract

Experiments were conducted with simulated Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) to understand the impact of pressure, moisture, and temperature on MSW decomposition under simulated landfill conditions. Three experimental phases were completed, where the first two phases provided baseline results and assisted in fine tuning parameters such as pressure, temperature, gas composition, and moisture content for phase three. The manuscript focuses on the results from third phase. In the third phase, the composition of the gases evolved from representative MSW samples was tested over time in two pressure conditions, 101 kilopascals (kPa) (atmospheric pressure) and 483 kPa, with varying moisture contents (38 to 55 wt%) and controlled temperatures (50 to 200 °C) in the presence of biological inhibitors. The headspace in the reactor in phase three was pressurized with gas mixture of 50/50 (vol%) of methane (CH) and carbon dioxide (CO) setting the initial CH/CO gas composition ratio to 1.0 at time t = 0 days. The results established moisture ranges that affect hydrogen (H) production and the CH/CO ratio at different temperature and pressure conditions. Results show that at 85 °C, there was a change in the CH/CO ratio from 1.0 to 0.3. Additionally, moisture contents from 47 to 43.5 wt% caused the CH/CO ratio to increase from 1.0 to 1.2, yet from 43.5 to 38 wt%, the ratio reversed and declined to 0.3, returning to 1.0 for moisture levels below 38 wt%. Thus, moisture levels above 47 wt% and below 38 wt%, for the system tested, allow thermal reactions to proceed without a measured change in CH/CO ratio. H generation rates follow a similar trend with moisture, yet definitively increase with increased pressure from 101 kPa to 483 kPa. The observed change in solid MSW and gas composition under controlled pressure, moisture, and temperature suggests the presence of thermal reactions in the absence of oxygen.

摘要

进行了模拟城市固体废物(MSW)的实验,以了解压力、湿度和温度对模拟垃圾填埋条件下 MSW 分解的影响。完成了三个实验阶段,前两个阶段提供了基准结果,并协助调整了压力、温度、气体组成和第三阶段的水分含量等参数。本文重点介绍第三阶段的结果。在第三阶段,在两种压力条件下(101 千帕斯卡(kPa)(大气压)和 483 kPa),随着时间的推移,测试了来自代表性 MSW 样品的气体组成,同时保持水分含量(38 至 55wt%)和控制温度(50 至 200°C),并存在生物抑制剂。在第三阶段,反应器的顶部空间用 50/50(体积%)的甲烷(CH)和二氧化碳(CO)的混合气体加压,将初始 CH/CO 气体组成比设定为 1.0,时间为 t=0 天。结果确定了在不同温度和压力条件下影响氢气(H)生成和 CH/CO 比的水分范围。结果表明,在 85°C 时,CH/CO 比从 1.0 变为 0.3。此外,水分含量从 47 到 43.5wt%导致 CH/CO 比从 1.0 增加到 1.2,但从 43.5 到 38wt%,该比值反转并下降到 0.3,当水分水平低于 38wt%时,该比值恢复到 1.0。因此,对于测试的系统,水分水平高于 47wt%且低于 38wt%允许热反应进行,而 CH/CO 比没有变化。H 生成率与水分呈相似趋势,但随着压力从 101 kPa 增加到 483 kPa 而明确增加。在受控压力、湿度和温度下观察到的固体 MSW 和气体组成的变化表明,在没有氧气的情况下存在热反应。

相似文献

1
The impact of pressure, moisture and temperature on pyrolysis of municipal solid waste under simulated landfill conditions and relevance to the field data from elevated temperature landfill.压力、湿度和温度对模拟填埋条件下城市固体废物热解的影响及与高温填埋场现场数据的相关性。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Jun 25;723:138031. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138031. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
2
Abiotic decomposition of municipal solid waste under elevated temperature landfill conditions.高温填埋条件下城市固体废物的非生物分解
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jun 1;823:153685. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153685. Epub 2022 Feb 5.
3
Determination of landfill gas generation potential from lignocellulose biomass contents of municipal solid waste.测定城市固体废物中木质纤维素生物质含量的垃圾填埋气生成潜力。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Sep 1;785:147243. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147243. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
4
Assessment of methane production from shredder waste in landfills: The influence of temperature, moisture and metals.评估垃圾填埋场中破碎机废物的甲烷生成:温度、湿度和金属的影响。
Waste Manag. 2017 May;63:226-237. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.11.023. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
5
Effect of basic oxygen furnace slag type on carbon dioxide sequestration from landfill gas emissions.氧气顶吹转炉渣类型对垃圾填埋气排放中二氧化碳捕集的影响。
Waste Manag. 2019 Feb 15;85:425-436. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.01.013. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
6
Spatial and temporal characteristics of elevated temperatures in municipal solid waste landfills.城市固体废弃物填埋场高温的时空特征
Waste Manag. 2017 Jan;59:286-301. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.10.052. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
7
Compressibility and shear strength of municipal solid waste under short-term leachate recirculation operations.短期渗滤液回灌作业下城市固体废弃物的压缩性和抗剪强度
Waste Manag Res. 2009 Sep;27(6):578-87. doi: 10.1177/0734242X09103825. Epub 2009 May 7.
8
Determination of ignition temperature of municipal solid waste for understanding surface and sub-surface landfill fire.测定城市固体废物的着火温度,以了解表层和次表层垃圾填埋场火灾。
Waste Manag. 2019 Sep;97:123-130. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.08.002. Epub 2019 Aug 9.
9
Understanding landfill gas behavior at elevated temperature landfills.了解高温垃圾填埋场中的垃圾填埋气行为。
Waste Manag. 2023 Jun 15;165:83-93. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2023.04.023. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
10
Methane emissions from a landfill in north-east India: Performance of various landfill gas emission models.印度东北部垃圾填埋场的甲烷排放:各种垃圾填埋场气体排放模型的性能。
Environ Pollut. 2018 Mar;234:174-180. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.11.064. Epub 2017 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Leachate indicators of an elevated temperature landfill.高温填埋场渗滤液指标
Waste Manag. 2023 Oct 14;171:628-633. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2023.10.001.