• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解析线索可见性和知识在调整认知控制中的作用:对法鲁基和曼利(2015 年)研究的预先注册直接复制。

Disentangling the Roles of Cue Visibility and Knowledge in Adjusting Cognitive Control: A Preregistered Direct Replication of the Farooqui and Manly (2015) Study.

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University.

Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University.

出版信息

Psychol Sci. 2020 Apr;31(4):468-479. doi: 10.1177/0956797620904045. Epub 2020 Mar 30.

DOI:10.1177/0956797620904045
PMID:32223719
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7492719/
Abstract

Recent research suggests that people can learn to link the control process of task switching to predictive cues so that switch costs are attenuated following informative precues of switch likelihood. However, the precise conditions that shape such contextual cuing of control are not well understood. Farooqui and Manly (2015) raised the possibility that cued task switching is more effective when cues of control demand are presented subliminally. In the current study, we aimed to replicate and extend these findings by more systematically manipulating whether cues of control demand are consciously perceived or are presented subliminally and whether participants have explicit prior knowledge of the cue meaning or acquire cue knowledge through experience. The direct replication was unsuccessful: We found no evidence for effective subliminal cuing but observed some evidence for participants reducing switch costs with explicit, supraliminal cues. Thus, cognitive control may be guided most effectively by explicitly understood and consciously perceived precues.

摘要

最近的研究表明,人们可以学习将任务切换的控制过程与预测线索联系起来,从而在信息丰富的切换可能性前导线索后降低切换成本。然而,控制的这种上下文提示的精确条件尚不清楚。法鲁基和曼利(2015 年)提出了这样一种可能性,即当控制需求的线索以潜意识的形式呈现时,提示性任务切换会更有效。在本研究中,我们旨在通过更系统地操纵控制需求线索是被有意识地感知还是潜意识呈现,以及参与者是否对线索含义有明确的先验知识或通过经验获得线索知识,来复制和扩展这些发现。直接复制是不成功的:我们没有发现有效的潜意识提示的证据,但观察到一些参与者通过明确的、超意识的线索降低切换成本的证据。因此,认知控制可能最有效地由明确理解和有意识感知的前导线索来指导。

相似文献

1
Disentangling the Roles of Cue Visibility and Knowledge in Adjusting Cognitive Control: A Preregistered Direct Replication of the Farooqui and Manly (2015) Study.解析线索可见性和知识在调整认知控制中的作用:对法鲁基和曼利(2015 年)研究的预先注册直接复制。
Psychol Sci. 2020 Apr;31(4):468-479. doi: 10.1177/0956797620904045. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
2
Long-lasting effects of performance-contingent unconscious and conscious reward incentives during cued task-switching.在提示任务转换期间,基于表现的无意识和意识奖励激励的持久影响。
Cortex. 2013 Jul-Aug;49(7):1943-54. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2012.05.018. Epub 2012 Jun 12.
3
Investigating a method for reducing residual switch costs in cued task switching.探究一种降低线索化任务切换中残留切换成本的方法。
Mem Cognit. 2016 Jul;44(5):762-77. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0590-2.
4
Adjustments of response speed and accuracy to unconscious cues.对无意识线索的反应速度和准确性的调整。
Cognition. 2015 Jan;134:57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.09.005. Epub 2014 Oct 17.
5
Conscious and unconscious reward cues can affect a critical component of executive control.有意识和无意识的奖励线索会影响执行控制的一个关键组成部分。
Exp Psychol. 2011;58(5):370-5. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000104.
6
Subliminally and consciously induced cognitive conflicts interact at several processing levels.阈下和有意识诱发的认知冲突在多个加工水平上相互作用。
Cortex. 2016 Dec;85:75-89. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.09.027. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
7
ADHD patients fail to maintain task goals in face of subliminally and consciously induced cognitive conflicts.ADHD 患者在面对潜意识和有意识引起的认知冲突时,无法维持任务目标。
Psychol Med. 2017 Jul;47(10):1771-1783. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717000216. Epub 2017 Mar 27.
8
The effect of subliminal incentives on goal-directed eye movements.阈下激励对目标导向眼球运动的影响。
J Neurophysiol. 2021 Dec 1;126(6):2014-2026. doi: 10.1152/jn.00414.2021. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
9
Anticipatory control through associative learning of subliminal relations: invisible may be better than visible.通过潜意识关系的联想学习进行预期控制:不可见的可能比可见的更好。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Mar;26(3):325-34. doi: 10.1177/0956797614564191. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
10
Cognitive control outside of conscious awareness.意识觉知之外的认知控制。
Conscious Cogn. 2017 Aug;53:185-193. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2017.06.014. Epub 2017 Jul 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Distinct but correlated latent factors support the regulation of learned conflict-control and task-switching.不同但相关的潜在因素支持学习冲突控制和任务转换的调节。
Cogn Psychol. 2022 Jun;135:101474. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2022.101474. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
2
Minimal impact of consolidation on learned switch-readiness.巩固对习得的转换准备影响最小。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 Oct;47(10):1622-1637. doi: 10.1037/xlm0001074. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
3
Performance feedback promotes proactive but not reactive adaptation of conflict-control.绩效反馈促进了冲突控制的主动适应而非被动适应。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Apr;46(4):369-387. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000720.

本文引用的文献

1
PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy.心理物理学 2 版:简单易用的行为实验。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):195-203. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y.
2
Control by association: Transfer of implicitly primed attentional states across linked stimuli.通过联想进行控制:跨链接刺激物转移隐含启动的注意状态。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Apr;25(2):617-626. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1445-6.
3
Cueing cognitive flexibility: Item-specific learning of switch readiness.提示认知灵活性:特定项目的转换准备学习。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Dec;43(12):1950-1960. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000420. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
4
Bayes factor design analysis: Planning for compelling evidence.贝叶斯因子设计分析:为有力证据进行规划。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Feb;25(1):128-142. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1230-y.
5
Context-specific attentional sampling: Intentional control as a pre-requisite for contextual control.
Conscious Cogn. 2016 Aug;44:146-160. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.07.001. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
6
Grounding cognitive control in associative learning.将认知控制根植于联想学习中。
Psychol Bull. 2016 Jul;142(7):693-728. doi: 10.1037/bul0000047. Epub 2016 May 5.
7
Activation of context-specific attentional control sets by exogenous allocation of visual attention to the context?通过将视觉注意力外源性分配到情境中,来激活特定情境的注意力控制集?
Psychol Res. 2017 Mar;81(2):378-391. doi: 10.1007/s00426-016-0746-5. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
8
Anticipatory control through associative learning of subliminal relations: invisible may be better than visible.通过潜意识关系的联想学习进行预期控制:不可见的可能比可见的更好。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Mar;26(3):325-34. doi: 10.1177/0956797614564191. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
9
The next trial will be conflicting! Effects of explicit congruency pre-cues on cognitive control.下一项试验将会充满矛盾!明确的一致性预线索对认知控制的影响。
Psychol Res. 2016 Jan;80(1):16-33. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0638-5. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
10
Creatures of habit (and control): a multi-level learning perspective on the modulation of congruency effects.习惯(与控制)的产物:关于一致性效应调节的多层次学习视角
Front Psychol. 2014 Nov 6;5:1247. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01247. eCollection 2014.