Field Epidemiology, Field Service, National Infection Service, Public Health England, Bristol, BS1 6EH, UK.
NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Evaluation of Interventions, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 2BN, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2020 Mar 30;20(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8424-3.
Flooding is expected to increase due to climate change, population growth and urban development. The longer-term mental health impacts of flooding are not well understood. In 2015, the English National Study of Flooding and Health was established to improve understanding of the impact of flooding on health and inform future public health action.
We used 3 years of data from the English National Study of Flooding and Health. Participants who had consented to follow up were sent a questionnaire. Participants were classified into either "unaffected", "disrupted" or "flooded" according to their exposure. Logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios for probable depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in each exposure group. The Wald test was used to assess the difference in probable mental health outcomes for those who did and did not experience "persistent damage" to their home. Conditional logistic regression was conducted to assess change in prevalence over the 3 years and to identify possible determinants of recovery.
Eight hundred nineteen individuals were included in the final analysis - 119 were classified as unaffected, 421 disrupted and 279 flooded. Overall, 5.7% had probable depression, 8.1% had probable anxiety and 11.8% had probable PTSD, with higher prevalence in the flooded group compared with the unaffected group. After adjustment for potential confounders, probable mental health outcomes were higher in the flooded group compared to the unaffected group, significantly for probable depression (aOR 8.48, 95% CI 1.04-68.97) and PTSD (aOR 7.74, 95% CI 2.24-26.79). Seventy-seven (9.4%) participants reported experiencing persistent damage to their home, most commonly damp (n = 40) and visible mould (n = 26) in liveable rooms. Of the 569 participants who responded at all 3 years, a significant reduction in prevalence for all probable mental health outcomes was observed in the flooded group.
Flooding can have severe long-lasting consequences on mental health in affected populations. If these problems are not identified and treated early, they may persist for years. Further research is necessary to develop and evaluate interventions to increase resilience in at risk populations and to ensure timely access to support services following flooding.
由于气候变化、人口增长和城市发展,预计洪水会增加。洪水对心理健康的长期影响还没有被很好地理解。2015 年,英国洪水与健康全国研究成立,旨在提高对洪水对健康影响的认识,并为未来的公共卫生行动提供信息。
我们使用了英国洪水与健康全国研究的 3 年数据。同意进行随访的参与者被发送了一份问卷。根据暴露情况,参与者被分为“未受影响”、“受干扰”或“被淹没”。使用逻辑回归模型计算每个暴露组中可能的抑郁、焦虑和创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的调整优势比。Wald 检验用于评估那些经历和不经历“持久损害”的人在可能的心理健康结果上的差异。条件逻辑回归用于评估 3 年内患病率的变化,并确定恢复的可能决定因素。
共有 819 人被纳入最终分析,其中 119 人被归类为未受影响,421 人被扰乱,279 人被淹没。总体而言,5.7%的人有抑郁的可能,8.1%的人有焦虑的可能,11.8%的人有 PTSD 的可能,受影响的人群比未受影响的人群的患病率更高。在调整了潜在的混杂因素后,与未受影响的人群相比,受影响的人群中可能的心理健康结果更高,在抑郁(aOR 8.48,95%CI 1.04-68.97)和 PTSD(aOR 7.74,95%CI 2.24-26.79)方面有显著差异。77 名(9.4%)参与者报告说他们的家遭受了持续的损害,最常见的是潮湿(n=40)和可见的霉菌(n=26)在可居住的房间里。在所有 3 年都有回应的 569 名参与者中,受影响的人群中所有可能的心理健康结果的患病率都显著降低。
洪水可能对受灾人群的心理健康造成严重的长期影响。如果这些问题没有及早发现和治疗,它们可能会持续多年。有必要进一步研究,以制定和评估干预措施,提高高危人群的适应力,并确保在洪水后及时获得支持服务。