• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三尖瓣生物瓣和机械瓣置换术后 15 年的结果。

Fifteen-Year Outcomes After Bioprosthetic and Mechanical Tricuspid Valve Replacement.

机构信息

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Nov;110(5):1564-1571. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.02.040. Epub 2020 Mar 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.02.040
PMID:32224239
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study was conducted to compare long-term clinical outcomes of mechanical and bioprosthetic tricuspid valve replacement (TVR).

METHODS

Two-hundred twenty-six TVR patients were enrolled; 120 patients underwent bioprosthetic TVR (BTV group) and 106 underwent mechanical TVR (MTV group). Early results and long-term clinical outcomes were compared. The median follow-up duration was 99 months (range, 1-295). Propensity score (PS) analyses including PS-adjusted Cox regression models and 1:1 PS matching were performed.

RESULTS

Mean ages of the MTV and BTV groups were 50.5 ± 10.3 and 60.8 ± 12.0 years, respectively. There were no significant differences in early mortality (4.9% in total) and postoperative complications between the 2 groups. The overall survival and freedom from cardiac death in the MTV group were similar to those in the BTV group (reference, BTV group; hazard ratio [HR], 0.82 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.44-1.53] and 0.91 [95% CI, 0.44-1.87], respectively). The risk of a composite of thromboembolism and bleeding was significantly higher in the MTV group (HR, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.16-4.77; P = .018). However the tricuspid valve reoperation rate was significantly lower in the MTV group (HR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.02-0.53; P = .007). Overall TV-related event rates in the MTV group were similar to those in the BTV group (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.49-1.28). PS matching extracted 69 pairs. Comparative analyses of early- and long-term outcomes from the matched groups yielded similar findings to those from the entire patient groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes of bioprosthetic TVR were comparable with those of mechanical TVR in terms of long-term survival and tricuspid valve-related events over a 15-year postoperative follow-up.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较机械和生物瓣三尖瓣置换术(TVR)的长期临床结果。

方法

共纳入 226 例 TVR 患者;120 例接受生物瓣 TVR(BTV 组),106 例接受机械瓣 TVR(MTV 组)。比较早期结果和长期临床结果。中位随访时间为 99 个月(范围 1-295)。进行倾向评分(PS)分析,包括 PS 调整的 Cox 回归模型和 1:1 PS 匹配。

结果

MTV 组和 BTV 组的平均年龄分别为 50.5 ± 10.3 岁和 60.8 ± 12.0 岁。两组间早期死亡率(总死亡率为 4.9%)和术后并发症无显著差异。MTV 组的总生存率和无心脏死亡生存率与 BTV 组相似(参考 BTV 组;风险比 [HR],0.82 [95%置信区间 {CI},0.44-1.53] 和 0.91 [95% CI,0.44-1.87])。MTV 组血栓栓塞和出血的复合风险明显更高(HR,2.35;95% CI,1.16-4.77;P =.018)。然而,MTV 组三尖瓣再次手术率明显较低(HR,0.11;95% CI,0.02-0.53;P =.007)。MTV 组的总 TV 相关事件发生率与 BTV 组相似(HR,0.79;95% CI,0.49-1.28)。PS 匹配提取了 69 对。对匹配组的早期和长期结果进行比较分析,得出的结果与整个患者组相似。

结论

在 15 年的术后随访中,生物瓣 TVR 的长期生存和三尖瓣相关事件结果与机械瓣 TVR 相当。

相似文献

1
Fifteen-Year Outcomes After Bioprosthetic and Mechanical Tricuspid Valve Replacement.三尖瓣生物瓣和机械瓣置换术后 15 年的结果。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2020 Nov;110(5):1564-1571. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.02.040. Epub 2020 Mar 26.
2
Propensity score matching analysis of mechanical versus bioprosthetic tricuspid valve replacements.机械瓣与生物瓣三尖瓣置换的倾向评分匹配分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Apr;97(4):1294-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.12.033. Epub 2014 Feb 22.
3
Long-Term Outcomes of Bioprosthetic and Mechanical Tricuspid Valve Replacement after Left-Sided Valves Surgery.二尖瓣手术后生物瓣和机械三尖瓣置换的长期结果。
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Dec 20;29(6):307-314. doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.23-00041. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
4
Mechanical Versus Bioprosthetic Valve Replacement in the Tricuspid Valve Position: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.机械瓣与生物瓣在三尖瓣置换中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Heart Lung Circ. 2021 Mar;30(3):362-371. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.03.011. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
5
Mechanical tricuspid valve replacement is not superior in patients younger than 65 years who need long-term anticoagulation.机械三尖瓣置换术在需要长期抗凝治疗且年龄小于 65 岁的患者中并不占优势。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Apr;93(4):1154-60. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.11.075. Epub 2012 Feb 25.
6
Mechanical valve replacement versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in the tricuspid valve position.三尖瓣位置机械瓣膜置换术与生物瓣膜置换术的比较
J Card Surg. 2013 May;28(3):212-7. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12093. Epub 2013 Mar 12.
7
Long-term clinical results of tricuspid valve replacement.三尖瓣置换术的长期临床结果。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Apr;81(4):1317-23, discussion 1323-4. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.11.005.
8
Early and long-term outcomes of bioprosthetic versus mechanical tricuspid valve replacement: A nationwide population-based study.生物瓣与机械瓣三尖瓣置换的早期和长期结局:一项全国范围内基于人群的研究。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Jun;167(6):2117-2128.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.01.025. Epub 2023 Feb 4.
9
Comparative analysis of structural valve deterioration after bioprosthetic tricuspid valve replacement: Bovine pericardial versus porcine valves.生物瓣三尖瓣置换术后结构性瓣膜衰败的对比分析:牛心包与猪瓣。
Artif Organs. 2021 Aug;45(8):911-918. doi: 10.1111/aor.13909. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
10
Prosthesis choice for tricuspid valve replacement: Comparison of clinical and echocardiographic outcomes.三尖瓣置换术的假体选择:临床和超声心动图结果比较。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Feb;167(2):668-679.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2022.07.003. Epub 2022 Jul 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Interventions to Manage Tricuspid Regurgitation: A Narrative Review.经导管三尖瓣介入治疗三尖瓣反流:一篇叙述性综述。
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Aug 15;26(8):39915. doi: 10.31083/RCM39915. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Tricuspid valve replacement with mechanical versus biological prostheses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.三尖瓣置换术采用机械瓣与生物瓣的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Nov 26;19(1):636. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-03014-0.
3
Durability of porcine and pericardial prostheses in tricuspid valve replacement.
猪心包瓣膜假体在三尖瓣置换术中的耐久性
JTCVS Open. 2024 Jun 29;21:78-87. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2024.06.017. eCollection 2024 Oct.
4
Pulmonary valve replacement for porcelain right ventricular outflow tract following repeated surgical intervention.反复手术干预后瓷化右心室流出道的肺动脉瓣置换术。
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Cases. 2024 Jan 12;3(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s44215-024-00126-w.
5
The 10 Commandments for Endoscopic Minimally Invasive Tricuspid Valve Repair.内镜微创三尖瓣修复的十条准则。
Innovations (Phila). 2024 May-Jun;19(3):219-226. doi: 10.1177/15569845241264571.
6
Surgical Treatment Strategy of Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation.功能性三尖瓣反流的外科治疗策略
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 May 21;25(5):182. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2505182. eCollection 2024 May.
7
Reply: Do not hesitate to implant a mechanical valve in tricuspid valve position for fear of later stroke and valve thrombosis in young-aged patients.回复:对于年轻患者,不要因担心后期中风和瓣膜血栓形成而犹豫是否在三尖瓣位置植入机械瓣膜。
JTCVS Open. 2023 Jun 8;15:175. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.06.001. eCollection 2023 Sep.
8
Long-Term Outcomes of Bioprosthetic and Mechanical Tricuspid Valve Replacement after Left-Sided Valves Surgery.二尖瓣手术后生物瓣和机械三尖瓣置换的长期结果。
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Dec 20;29(6):307-314. doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.23-00041. Epub 2023 Jun 29.