• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单项与多项干预措施降低 CT 检查患者辐射剂量效果的比较:一项随机临床试验。

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Single-Component and Multicomponent Interventions for Reducing Radiation Doses in Patients Undergoing Computed Tomography: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco.

Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco.

出版信息

JAMA Intern Med. 2020 May 1;180(5):666-675. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0064.

DOI:10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0064
PMID:32227142
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7105953/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Computed tomography (CT) radiation doses vary across institutions and are often higher than needed.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effectiveness of 2 interventions to reduce radiation doses in patients undergoing CT.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized clinical trial included 864 080 adults older than 18 years who underwent CT of the abdomen, chest, combined abdomen and chest, or head at 100 facilities in 6 countries from November 1, 2015, to September 21, 2017. Data analysis was performed from October 4, 2017, to December 14, 2018.

INTERVENTIONS

Imaging facilities received audit feedback alone comparing radiation-dose metrics with those of other facilities followed by the multicomponent intervention, including audit feedback with targeted suggestions, a 7-week quality improvement collaborative, and best-practice sharing. Facilities were randomly allocated to the time crossing from usual care to the intervention.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Primary outcomes were the proportion of high-dose CT scans and mean effective dose at the facility level. Secondary outcomes were organ doses. Outcomes after interventions were compared with those before interventions using hierarchical generalized linear models adjusting for temporal trends and patient characteristics.

RESULTS

Across 100 facilities, 864 080 adults underwent 1 156 657 CT scans. The multicomponent intervention significantly reduced proportions of high-dose CT scans, measured using effective dose. Absolute changes in proportions of high-dose scans were 1.1% to 7.9%, with percentage reductions in the proportion of high-dose scans of 4% to 30% (abdomen: odds ratio [OR], 0.82; 95% CI, 0.77-0.88; P < .001; chest: OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-0.99; P = .03; combined abdomen and chest: OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.41-0.59; P < .001; and head: OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.66-0.76; P < .001). Reductions in the proportions of high-dose scans were greater when measured using organ doses. The absolute reduction in the proportion of high-dose scans was 6.0% to 17.2%, reflecting 23% to 58% reductions in the proportions of high-dose scans across anatomical areas. Mean effective doses were significantly reduced after multicomponent intervention for abdomen (6% reduction, P < .001), chest (4%, P < .001), and chest and abdomen (14%, P < .001) CT scans. Larger reductions in mean organ doses were 8% to 43% across anatomical areas. Audit feedback alone reduced the proportions of high-dose scans and mean dose, but reductions in observed dose were smaller. Radiologist's satisfaction with CT image quality was unchanged and high during all periods.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

For imaging facilities, detailed feedback on CT radiation dose combined with actionable suggestions and quality improvement education significantly reduced doses, particularly organ doses. Effects of audit feedback alone were modest.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03000751.

摘要

重要性

计算机断层扫描(CT)的辐射剂量因机构而异,且往往高于实际所需。

目的

评估两种干预措施降低 CT 检查患者辐射剂量的效果。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项随机临床试验,纳入了 2015 年 11 月 1 日至 2017 年 9 月 21 日期间来自 6 个国家的 100 个医疗机构的 864080 名 18 岁以上成年人,他们接受了腹部、胸部、腹部和胸部联合或头部 CT 检查。数据分析于 2017 年 10 月 4 日至 2018 年 12 月 14 日进行。

干预措施

影像机构在收到比较与其他机构的辐射剂量指标的审计反馈后,单独接收多组分干预措施,包括带有针对性建议的审计反馈、为期 7 周的质量改进合作和最佳实践分享。机构被随机分配到从常规护理过渡到干预的时间点。

主要结果和测量

主要结局是高剂量 CT 扫描的比例和机构层面的有效剂量平均值。次要结局是器官剂量。使用分层广义线性模型比较干预前后的结局,该模型调整了时间趋势和患者特征。

结果

在 100 家机构中,864080 名成年人接受了 1156657 次 CT 扫描。多组分干预显著降低了有效剂量测量的高剂量 CT 扫描比例。高剂量扫描比例的绝对变化为 1.1%至 7.9%,高剂量扫描比例的百分比降低为 4%至 30%(腹部:比值比 [OR],0.82;95%CI,0.77-0.88;P<0.001;胸部:OR,0.92;95%CI,0.86-0.99;P=0.03;腹部和胸部联合:OR,0.49;95%CI,0.41-0.59;P<0.001;头部:OR,0.71;95%CI,0.66-0.76;P<0.001)。使用器官剂量测量时,高剂量扫描比例的降低更大。高剂量扫描比例的绝对减少为 6.0%至 17.2%,反映了各个解剖区域高剂量扫描比例降低了 23%至 58%。腹部(降低 6%,P<0.001)、胸部(降低 4%,P<0.001)和胸部和腹部(降低 14%,P<0.001)CT 扫描的有效剂量在多组分干预后均显著降低。各解剖区域的平均器官剂量降低幅度更大,为 8%至 43%。单独的审计反馈降低了高剂量扫描和平均剂量的比例,但观察到的剂量减少幅度较小。放射科医生对 CT 图像质量的满意度在所有时期都保持不变且很高。

结论和相关性

对于影像机构,详细的 CT 辐射剂量反馈加上可操作的建议和质量改进教育可显著降低剂量,尤其是器官剂量。单独的审计反馈效果有限。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT03000751。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Single-Component and Multicomponent Interventions for Reducing Radiation Doses in Patients Undergoing Computed Tomography: A Randomized Clinical Trial.单项与多项干预措施降低 CT 检查患者辐射剂量效果的比较:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 May 1;180(5):666-675. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0064.
2
Optimizing Radiation Doses for Computed Tomography Across Institutions: Dose Auditing and Best Practices.跨机构优化计算机断层扫描的辐射剂量:剂量审核与最佳实践
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jun 1;177(6):810-817. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0445.
3
International variation in radiation dose for computed tomography examinations: prospective cohort study.国际计算机断层扫描检查辐射剂量的差异:前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ. 2019 Jan 2;364:k4931. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4931.
4
Introducing fitting models for estimating age-specific dose and effective dose in paediatric patients undergoing head, chest and abdomen-pelvis imaging protocols: a patient study.引入适合的模型来估算接受头、胸和腹部-骨盆成像方案的儿科患者的年龄特异性剂量和有效剂量:一项患者研究。
J Med Radiat Sci. 2024 Jun;71(2):251-260. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.772. Epub 2024 Mar 7.
5
Analysis of Computed Tomography Radiation Doses Used for Lung Cancer Screening Scans.肺癌筛查扫描用计算机断层扫描辐射剂量分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Dec 1;179(12):1650-1657. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.3893.
6
Size-specific dose estimations for pediatric chest, abdomen/pelvis and head CT scans with the use of GATE.使用 GATE 进行儿科胸部、腹部/骨盆和头部 CT 扫描的剂量估算。
Phys Med. 2019 Sep;65:181-190. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.08.020. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
7
The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk.儿童中计算机断层扫描的应用及其相关的辐射暴露和癌症风险估计。
JAMA Pediatr. 2013 Aug 1;167(8):700-7. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.311.
8
Radiation Dose for Pediatric CT: Comparison of Pediatric versus Adult Imaging Facilities.儿科 CT 辐射剂量:儿科与成人影像设施比较。
Radiology. 2019 Apr;291(1):158-167. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019181753. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
9
Impact of patient centering in CT on organ dose and the effect of using a positioning compensation system: Evidence from OSLD measurements in postmortem subjects.在 CT 中以患者为中心对器官剂量的影响,以及使用定位补偿系统的效果:来自死后受试者 OSLD 测量的证据。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Jun;20(6):141-151. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12594. Epub 2019 May 2.
10
Reduction in radiation doses from paediatric CT scans in Great Britain.英国儿科CT扫描辐射剂量的降低
Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1060):20150305. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150305. Epub 2016 Feb 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.审核与反馈:对专业实践的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 25;3(3):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub4.
2
Use of diagnostic vs low-dose computed tomography in positron emission tomography-CT examinations.在正电子发射断层扫描-计算机断层扫描(PET-CT)检查中诊断性计算机断层扫描与低剂量计算机断层扫描的应用。
Eur Radiol. 2025 Mar 7. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11391-w.
3
Comprehensive Guide to Randomized Controlled Trials in Radiology: Everything You Need to Know.放射学随机对照试验综合指南:你需要了解的一切。
Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2025 Jan 9;35(Suppl 1):S119-S127. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1792044. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
Understanding the risk of ionizing radiation in breast imaging: Concepts and quantities, clinical importance, and future directions.了解乳腺成像中电离辐射的风险:概念与量值、临床重要性及未来方向。
Eur J Radiol. 2024 Dec;181:111784. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111784. Epub 2024 Oct 12.
5
Exploring the content and delivery of feedback facilitation co-interventions: a systematic review.探索反馈促进共同干预的内容和实施方式:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2024 May 28;19(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s13012-024-01365-9.
6
CT acquisition parameter selection in the real world: impacts on radiation dose and variation amongst 155 institutions.真实世界中的 CT 采集参数选择:对辐射剂量的影响及 155 家机构间的差异。
Eur Radiol. 2024 Mar;34(3):1605-1613. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-10161-w. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
7
Sample size calculations for indirect standardization.间接标准化的样本量计算。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Apr 11;23(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-01912-w.
8
Dose length product to effective dose coefficients in children.剂量长度乘积与儿童有效剂量系数。
Pediatr Radiol. 2023 Jul;53(8):1659-1668. doi: 10.1007/s00247-023-05638-1. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
9
Audit on Compliance to Guidelines in CT Scanning for Urolithiasis.尿路结石CT扫描指南遵循情况审计
J Belg Soc Radiol. 2022 Dec 9;106(1):127. doi: 10.5334/jbsr.2941. eCollection 2022.
10
Strategies for Dose Optimization: Views From Health Care Systems.剂量优化策略:医疗保健系统的观点。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2022 Apr;19(4):534-541. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.01.012. Epub 2022 Feb 25.

本文引用的文献

1
International variation in radiation dose for computed tomography examinations: prospective cohort study.国际计算机断层扫描检查辐射剂量的差异:前瞻性队列研究。
BMJ. 2019 Jan 2;364:k4931. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k4931.
2
Are quality improvement collaboratives effective? A systematic review.质量改进合作是否有效?系统评价。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Mar;27(3):226-240. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006926. Epub 2017 Oct 21.
3
Optimizing Radiation Doses for Computed Tomography Across Institutions: Dose Auditing and Best Practices.跨机构优化计算机断层扫描的辐射剂量:剂量审核与最佳实践
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jun 1;177(6):810-817. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.0445.
4
Relationship between paediatric CT scans and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: assessment of the impact of underlying conditions.儿科CT扫描与白血病和脑肿瘤后续风险之间的关系:对潜在疾病影响的评估
Br J Cancer. 2016 Feb 16;114(4):388-94. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.415.
5
Risk of cancer from occupational exposure to ionising radiation: retrospective cohort study of workers in France, the United Kingdom, and the United States (INWORKS).职业性接触电离辐射导致癌症的风险:法国、英国和美国工人的回顾性队列研究(INWORKS)
BMJ. 2015 Oct 20;351:h5359. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h5359.
6
Ionising radiation and risk of death from leukaemia and lymphoma in radiation-monitored workers (INWORKS): an international cohort study.辐射监测工作人员的电离辐射与白血病和淋巴瘤死亡风险(INWORKS):一项国际队列研究
Lancet Haematol. 2015 Jul;2(7):e276-81. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(15)00094-0.
7
Long-term effects of radiation exposure on health.长期辐射暴露对健康的影响。
Lancet. 2015 Aug 1;386(9992):469-78. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61167-9.
8
CT Radiation Dose Optimization and Tracking Program at a Large Quaternary-Care Health Care System.大型四级医疗保健系统的CT辐射剂量优化与跟踪计划
J Am Coll Radiol. 2015 Jul;12(7):703-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.03.037. Epub 2015 May 21.
9
Personalized technologist dose audit feedback for reducing patient radiation exposure from CT.用于减少CT检查中患者辐射暴露的个性化技术剂量审核反馈
J Am Coll Radiol. 2014 Mar;11(3):300-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2013.10.017.
10
Multidetector CT radiation dose optimisation in adults: short- and long-term effects of a clinical audit.多排 CT 辐射剂量优化在成年人中的应用:临床审核的短期和长期影响。
Eur Radiol. 2014 Jan;24(1):169-75. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2994-8. Epub 2013 Aug 29.