Center for Research and Education, Benjamin Rose Institute on Aging, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Adult Protective Services Division, Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Austin, Texas, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Aug;68(8):1748-1754. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16433. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
Previous research has identified several barriers faced by clinicians in detecting and reporting elder abuse, such as lack of knowledge about the process to report suspected cases of abuse and lack of access to experts to consult with. A novel intervention was designed and tested that embedded two Adult Protective Services (APS) specialists in a healthcare system operating primary care clinics serving a large Medicare population.
To examine the types of roles the APS specialists played in the healthcare system and the number and types of cases of suspected abuse among older patients that clinicians consulted them about and reported to APS.
Cross-sectional, exploratory study.
Primary care clinics in five regions of Texas.
Older patients of primary care clinics.
APS specialists and project staff trained clinicians on how to identify and report abuse, neglect, and exploitation among older patients. The specialists were also available in person or by telephone and email to consult with clinicians about patients suspected of being abused by others or being self-neglecting.
Data were obtained by conducting semistructured telephone interviews with APS specialists; and from APS specialists' written documentation/notes of consultations with clinicians regarding suspicion of abuse among patients and whether a report to APS was warranted.
The APS specialists trained clinicians on abuse, consulted with clinicians, and served as a liaison between the healthcare system and APS. During the project, clinicians reported 529 older patients to APS, and 386 patients received one or more services documented by APS at case closure. These cases involved 902 allegations of various types of abuse, of which the most common was self-neglect (617 or 68%).
Embedding APS specialists in a large healthcare system led to clinicians' increased awareness of the importance of identifying and reporting elder abuse, particularly self-neglect. J Am Geriatr Soc 68:1748-1754, 2020.
先前的研究已经确定了临床医生在检测和报告虐待老年人方面面临的几个障碍,例如缺乏报告疑似虐待案件的程序知识,也无法咨询专家。本研究设计并测试了一种新的干预措施,即在一个医疗保健系统中嵌入两名保护服务专家,该系统为一个大型医疗保险人群提供初级保健诊所服务。
检查保护服务专家在医疗保健系统中扮演的角色类型,以及临床医生向他们咨询并向保护服务报告的疑似虐待老年患者的人数和类型。
横断面、探索性研究。
德克萨斯州五个地区的初级保健诊所。
初级保健诊所的老年患者。
保护服务专家和项目工作人员培训临床医生如何识别和报告虐待、忽视和剥削老年人的行为。专家还可以亲自或通过电话和电子邮件为临床医生提供咨询,以了解疑似受到他人虐待或自我忽视的患者。
通过对保护服务专家进行半结构化电话访谈获得数据;并从保护服务专家关于临床医生对患者虐待怀疑的咨询的书面记录/笔记中获取数据,以及是否有必要向保护服务报告。
保护服务专家对临床医生进行了虐待培训,与临床医生进行了咨询,并在医疗保健系统和保护服务之间充当联络人。在项目期间,临床医生向保护服务报告了 529 名老年患者,386 名患者在结案时收到了保护服务记录的一项或多项服务。这些病例涉及各种类型的虐待指控 902 起,最常见的是自我忽视(617 起或 68%)。
将保护服务专家嵌入大型医疗保健系统可提高临床医生识别和报告虐待老年人的意识,特别是自我忽视。美国老年医学会 68:1748-1754, 2020。