Radiology Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
Medical University of Vienna/General Hospital Vienna, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Wien, Austria.
Acta Radiol. 2021 Jan;62(1):19-26. doi: 10.1177/0284185120912408. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
Motion is a relevant cause of artifacts in breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), potentially degrading image quality, even with optimized protocols.
To investigate the causes of motion artifacts (MA) impacting on image quality (IQ) of contrast-enhanced breast MRI.
Retrospective two-center study on consecutive 1.5-T contrast-enhanced breast MRI, independently reviewed by two radiologists on first subtracted and maximum intensity projection images to define the side most affected by MA. IQ was scored as 1 (optimal), 2 (reduced, but without reduction of diagnostic power), or 3 (reduced, with reduced diagnostic power). Correlations with injection side, breast size (A/B vs. C/D cups), patient age, clinical indication, and MRI scanner/protocol were assessed using χ and Fisher's exact statistics.
In total, 237 examinations were included, with right injection performed in 124 (52%) and left in 113 (48%). MA were more frequent on the side ipsilateral to the injection (144/237, 61%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 54-67%) than on the contralateral (93/237, 95% CI 33-46%) ( < 0.001); IQ was scored 1 in 154/237 (65%), 2 in 63/237 (27%), and 3 in 20/237 (8%) examinations; patients with A/B cups showed higher IQ score than patients with C/D cups (scores 1, 2, and 3: 54% vs. 70%; 29% vs. 25%; 17% vs. 5%, respectively, = 0.002). No significant correlations were found for MA (≥0.106) or IQ ( ≥ 0.318) between ipsi- or contralateral injection and right/left injection, breast size, age, indication, or scanner/protocol.
MA were more frequent in breasts ipsilateral to contrast injection and showed a reduced IQ for small breasts.
运动是导致乳腺磁共振成像(MRI)伪影的一个相关因素,即使使用优化的方案,也可能会降低图像质量。
研究导致运动伪影(MA)影响对比增强乳腺 MRI 图像质量(IQ)的原因。
回顾性的在两个中心进行了 1.5-T 对比增强乳腺 MRI 研究,由两位放射科医生独立评估第一减影和最大强度投影图像,以确定受 MA 影响最大的一侧。IQ 评分 1(最佳)、2(降低,但不降低诊断能力)或 3(降低,诊断能力降低)。使用 χ 和 Fisher 确切检验评估与注射侧、乳房大小(A/B 与 C/D 罩杯)、患者年龄、临床指征和 MRI 扫描仪/方案的相关性。
共纳入 237 例检查,右侧注射 124 例(52%),左侧注射 113 例(48%)。与对侧(93/237,95%置信区间 [CI] 33-46%)相比,同侧(144/237,95% CI 54-67%)注射侧 MA 更常见( < 0.001);237 例检查中,IQ 评分 1 为 154 例(65%),2 为 63 例(27%),3 为 20 例(8%);A/B 罩杯患者的 IQ 评分高于 C/D 罩杯患者(评分 1、2 和 3:分别为 54%、70%、29%、25%、17%, = 0.002)。同侧或对侧注射与右/左侧注射、乳房大小、年龄、适应证或扫描仪/方案之间的 MA(≥0.106)或 IQ(≥0.318)均无显著相关性。
与对比剂注射相比,对侧乳房的 MA 更常见,且小乳房的 IQ 降低。