• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单独接受溶栓和保守治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并冠状动脉夹层。

Coronary dissection with ST elevation myocardial infarction responding to thrombolytic and conservative therapy alone.

机构信息

Cardiovascular Research Center, Modarres Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Masih Daneshvari Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University Medical Center, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Future Cardiol. 2020 Jul;16(4):271-274. doi: 10.2217/fca-2018-0071. Epub 2020 Mar 31.

DOI:10.2217/fca-2018-0071
PMID:32228248
Abstract

In this report, we describe a case of spontaneous coronary dissection involving left anterior descending artery presenting with acute anterior myocardial infarction successfully treated with thrombolytic and conservative therapy with a suggestion that spontaneous resolution of thrombus occurred before coronary intervention could be performed. As we did not have initial angiogram due to patient's refusal, this assumption is speculative. However, this case suggests that dissections may heal spontaneously and could be treated with conservative approach in selected cases based on best clinical judgment. It is important to realize that the clinical course of a major coronary artery dissection remains unpredictable. Therefore, cardiologists should always treat each case individually and consider coronary interventions if conservative treatment is not leading to resolution of ST elevation or in patients with hemodynamic compromise. This case is followed by discussion about conservative versus invasive management of spontaneous coronary dissections.

摘要

在本报告中,我们描述了一例左前降支自发性冠状动脉夹层导致急性前壁心肌梗死的病例,该患者成功接受了溶栓和保守治疗,提示在进行冠状动脉介入治疗之前血栓自发溶解。由于患者拒绝进行初始血管造影,因此我们没有初始血管造影,这一假设是推测性的。然而,该病例提示夹层可能会自发愈合,并且在基于最佳临床判断的情况下,在某些情况下可以采用保守方法进行治疗。需要认识到,主要冠状动脉夹层的临床过程仍然不可预测。因此,心脏病专家应始终根据具体情况个体化治疗每个病例,如果保守治疗不能使 ST 段抬高得到缓解或患者出现血流动力学不稳定,则应考虑进行冠状动脉介入治疗。本病例后对自发性冠状动脉夹层的保守治疗与介入治疗进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
Coronary dissection with ST elevation myocardial infarction responding to thrombolytic and conservative therapy alone.单独接受溶栓和保守治疗的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并冠状动脉夹层。
Future Cardiol. 2020 Jul;16(4):271-274. doi: 10.2217/fca-2018-0071. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
2
Efficacy and Safety of a Pharmaco-Invasive Strategy With Half-Dose Alteplase Versus Primary Angioplasty in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: EARLY-MYO Trial (Early Routine Catheterization After Alteplase Fibrinolysis Versus Primary PCI in Acute ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction).半剂量阿替普酶与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死中的疗效和安全性:EARLY-MYO 试验(阿替普酶溶栓后早期常规冠状动脉造影与急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较)。
Circulation. 2017 Oct 17;136(16):1462-1473. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030582. Epub 2017 Aug 27.
3
Relationship Between Arterial Access and Outcomes in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction With a Pharmacoinvasive Versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Strategy: Insights From the STrategic Reperfusion Early After Myocardial Infarction (STREAM) Study.药物介入与直接经皮冠状动脉介入策略治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的动脉入路与结局的关系:来自心肌梗死后早期强化再灌注策略(STREAM)研究的见解。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Jun 13;5(6):e003559. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.003559.
4
Characteristics, Management, and Outcome of Transient ST-elevation Versus Persistent ST-elevation and Non-ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction.短暂性ST段抬高与持续性ST段抬高及非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的特征、管理与结局
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Jun 15;121(12):1449-1455. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.02.029. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
5
Interventional Dilemma in a Young Woman With Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection Who Presented With High-Risk Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI) Progressing to ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI).一名年轻女性自发性冠状动脉夹层患者的介入困境,该患者最初表现为高危非ST段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI),随后进展为ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)。
Cureus. 2022 Apr 9;14(4):e23983. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23983. eCollection 2022 Apr.
6
Thrombolysis-Guided Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.溶栓引导的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
J Invasive Cardiol. 2018 Dec;30(12):E154.
7
Comparison of 30-day mortality and myocardial scar indices for patients treated with prehospital reduced dose fibrinolytic followed by percutaneous coronary intervention versus percutaneous coronary intervention alone for treatment of ST-elevation myocardial infarction.比较院前给予低剂量纤溶治疗后再行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与单纯经皮冠状动脉介入治疗ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的30天死亡率和心肌瘢痕指数。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Nov;88(5):709-715. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26523. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
8
Comparison of myocardial microcirculatory perfusion after catheter-administered intracoronary thrombolysis with anisodamine versus standard thrombus aspiration in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.经导管冠状动脉内溶栓治疗与标准血栓抽吸术治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者心肌微循环灌注的比较。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Feb 15;93(S1):839-845. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28112. Epub 2019 Feb 17.
9
Pharmacoinvasive Strategy Versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者药物介入策略与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的倾向评分匹配分析
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Sep;9(9). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003508.
10
Pharmacoinvasive Strategy Versus Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Clinical Practice: Insights From the Vital Heart Response Registry.临床实践中 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死的药物侵入策略与直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较:来自 Vital Heart Response 注册研究的见解。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Oct;12(10):e008059. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.119.008059. Epub 2019 Oct 14.