Suppr超能文献

识别新热带地区长期记录中森林恢复力的驱动因素。

Identifying drivers of forest resilience in long-term records from the Neotropics.

机构信息

Long-Term Ecology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Biodiversity Informatics and Spatial Analysis, Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Richmond, UK.

出版信息

Biol Lett. 2020 Apr;16(4):20200005. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2020.0005. Epub 2020 Apr 1.

Abstract

Here, we use 30 long-term, high-resolution palaeoecological records from Mexico, Central and South America to address two hypotheses regarding possible drivers of resilience in tropical forests as measured in terms of recovery rates from previous disturbances. First, we hypothesize that faster recovery rates are associated with regions of higher biodiversity, as suggested by the insurance hypothesis. And second, that resilience is due to intrinsic abiotic factors that are location specific, thus regions presently displaying resilience in terms of persistence to current climatic disturbances should also show higher recovery rates in the past. To test these hypotheses, we applied a threshold approach to identify past disturbances to forests within each sequence. We then compared the recovery rates to these events with pollen richness before the event. We also compared recovery rates of each site with a measure of present resilience in the region as demonstrated by measuring global vegetation persistence to climatic perturbations using satellite imagery. Preliminary results indeed show a positive relationship between pre-disturbance taxonomic richness and faster recovery rates. However, there is less evidence to support the concept that resilience is intrinsic to a region; patterns of resilience apparent in ecosystems presently are not necessarily conservative through time.

摘要

在这里,我们使用了来自墨西哥、中美洲和南美洲的 30 个长期、高分辨率的古生态记录,以解决关于热带森林弹性的两个假说,这些假说可以通过从以前的干扰中恢复的速度来衡量。首先,我们假设更快的恢复速度与更高生物多样性的地区有关,这与保险假说一致。其次,弹性是由于特定位置的内在非生物因素造成的,因此目前在抵抗当前气候干扰方面表现出弹性的地区在过去也应该显示出更高的恢复速度。为了检验这些假说,我们应用了一个阈值方法来确定每个序列中森林以前的干扰。然后,我们将这些事件的恢复速度与事件发生前的花粉丰富度进行了比较。我们还将每个地点的恢复速度与该地区当前弹性的一个衡量标准进行了比较,该标准通过使用卫星图像来衡量全球植被对气候波动的持久性来测量。初步结果确实表明,在干扰前的分类学丰富度与更快的恢复速度之间存在正相关关系。然而,支持弹性是内在的区域概念的证据较少;目前在生态系统中表现出的弹性模式不一定随着时间的推移而保守。

相似文献

1
Identifying drivers of forest resilience in long-term records from the Neotropics.
Biol Lett. 2020 Apr;16(4):20200005. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2020.0005. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
2
Recovery and resilience of tropical forests after disturbance.
Nat Commun. 2014 May 20;5:3906. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4906.
3
Long-term disturbance dynamics and resilience of tropical peat swamp forests.
J Ecol. 2015 Jan;103(1):16-30. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12329. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
4
Seizing resilience windows to foster passive recovery in the forest-water interface in Amazonian lands.
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jul 1;828:154425. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154425. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
5
Response diversity, functional redundancy, and post-logging productivity in northern temperate and boreal forests.
Ecol Appl. 2018 Jul;28(5):1282-1291. doi: 10.1002/eap.1727. Epub 2018 May 22.
6
Measuring resilience and assessing vulnerability of terrestrial ecosystems to climate change in South America.
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 19;13(3):e0194654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194654. eCollection 2018.
10
High resilience of bryophyte assemblages in streamside compared to upland forests.
Ecology. 2009 Apr;90(4):1042-54. doi: 10.1890/07-1822.1.

引用本文的文献

2
Managing protected areas takes a village.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Feb 4;122(5):e2425972122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2425972122. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
3
A link between evolution and society fostering the UN sustainable development goals.
Evol Appl. 2024 Jun 14;17(6):e13728. doi: 10.1111/eva.13728. eCollection 2024 Jun.
5
Special feature: measuring components of ecological resilience in long-term ecological datasets.
Biol Lett. 2021 Jan;17(1):20200881. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2020.0881. Epub 2021 Jan 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Accounting for landscape heterogeneity improves spatial predictions of tree vulnerability to drought.
New Phytol. 2018 Oct;220(1):132-146. doi: 10.1111/nph.15274. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
2
Sensitivity of global terrestrial ecosystems to climate variability.
Nature. 2016 Mar 10;531(7593):229-32. doi: 10.1038/nature16986. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
3
Temporal stability in forest productivity increases with tree diversity due to asynchrony in species dynamics.
Ecol Lett. 2014 Dec;17(12):1526-35. doi: 10.1111/ele.12357. Epub 2014 Sep 12.
4
Recovery and resilience of tropical forests after disturbance.
Nat Commun. 2014 May 20;5:3906. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4906.
5
Biodiversity and ecosystem stability: a synthesis of underlying mechanisms.
Ecol Lett. 2013 May;16 Suppl 1:106-15. doi: 10.1111/ele.12073. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
8
Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Feb 16;96(4):1463-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.4.1463.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验