Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Center for Communication Programs, 111 Market Place, Suite 310, Baltimore, MD, 21202, USA.
Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Tahir Foundation Building, 12 Science Drive 2, Level 09-03J, Singapore, 117549, Singapore.
Malar J. 2020 Mar 30;19(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s12936-020-03198-5.
Conceptualizing gender dynamics and ways of bridging entrenched gender roles will contribute to better health promotion, policy and planning. Such processes are explored in relation to malaria in Mozambique.
A multi-method, qualitative study using focus group discussions (FGDs) and in-depth interviews (IDIs) explored the perspectives of community members, leaders and stakeholders on malaria. The study was conducted in Nampula Province, in an intervention district for the Tchova Tchova Stop Malaria (TTSM) gender-sensitive community dialogues, and in a non-intervention district.
Participants (n = 106) took part in six FGDs and five IDIs in each district. Those exposed to TTSM commonly stated that the programme influenced more equalitarian gender roles, attitudes and uptake of protective malaria-related practices. These positive changes occurred within the context of an observed, gendered decision-making matrix, which aligns inward- or outward-facing decisions with malaria prevention or treatment. Decisions more dependent on male or elder sanctioning at community level are outward-facing decisions, while decisions falling within women's domain at household level are inward-facing decisions. Related to prevention, using bed nets was largely an inward-facing prevention decision for women, who were generally tasked with hanging, washing and making nets usable. Net purchase and appropriation for malaria prevention (rather than for instance for fishing) was men's prerogative. Regular net use was associated with sleeping together more regularly, bringing couples closer. Attending antenatal care to access intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy was often an outward-facing prevention decision, under the purview of older, influential women and ultimately needing sanctioning by men. With respect to seeking care for malaria symptoms, women typically sought help from traditional healers first. This inward-facing treatment decision was within their control, in contrast to the frequently transport-dependent, outward-facing decision to attend a health facility. Sharing decisions was described as a feature of a "harmonious household," something that was said to be encouraged by the TTSM intervention and that was both lived and aspirational.
TTSM community dialogues helped communication on both interpersonal (couple) and community levels, ultimately encouraging malaria-related behaviours. Leveraging ways of bringing men and women together to share decision making will improve malaria intervention success.
概念化性别动态和弥合根深蒂固的性别角色的方法将有助于促进更好的健康促进、政策和规划。莫桑比克的疟疾研究探索了这些过程。
本研究采用多方法、定性研究方法,使用焦点小组讨论(FGD)和深入访谈(IDI),探讨了社区成员、领导人和利益攸关方对疟疾的看法。该研究在楠普拉省进行,该省是 Tchova Tchova 停止疟疾(TTSM)性别敏感社区对话的干预区,也是一个非干预区。
参与者(n=106)参加了每个地区的六个 FGD 和五个 IDI。那些接触过 TTSM 的人普遍表示,该方案影响了更平等的性别角色、态度和采取保护性疟疾相关做法。这些积极变化发生在观察到的、性别化的决策矩阵背景下,该矩阵将面向内或面向外的决策与疟疾预防或治疗联系起来。在社区层面上更多地依赖男性或长辈批准的决策是面向外的决策,而在家庭层面上属于妇女领域的决策则是面向内的决策。与预防有关,使用蚊帐主要是妇女的内向预防决策,她们通常负责悬挂、清洗和使蚊帐可用。购买和专门用于预防疟疾的蚊帐(而不是用于捕鱼等)是男子的特权。定期使用蚊帐与更经常地一起睡觉有关,使夫妻关系更亲密。为了获得间歇性预防治疗而参加产前护理通常是一种面向外的预防决策,这是由年长、有影响力的妇女负责的,最终需要男子的批准。关于寻求疟疾症状的治疗,妇女通常首先寻求传统治疗师的帮助。这种内向的治疗决策是在她们的控制范围内的,而不是经常依赖于交通的外向治疗决策,即前往医疗机构。共同决策被描述为“和谐家庭”的一个特征,据说 TTSM 干预措施鼓励了这一点,这既是现实存在的,也是人们向往的。
TTSM 社区对话有助于促进人际(夫妻)和社区层面的沟通,最终鼓励与疟疾相关的行为。利用使男女共同分担决策的方法将提高疟疾干预的成功。