Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge and Cambridge University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Department of Intensive Care, Hôpital privé de la Loire, Saint Etienne, France.
Fluids Barriers CNS. 2020 Mar 30;17(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12987-020-00184-6.
Post-traumatic hydrocephalus (PTH) is potentially under-diagnosed and under-treated, generating the need for a more efficient diagnostic tool. We aim to report CSF dynamics of patients with post-traumatic ventriculomegaly.
We retrospectively analysed post-traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients with ventriculomegaly who had undergone a CSF infusion test. We calculated the resistance to CSF outflow (Rout), AMP (pulse amplitude of intracranial pressure, ICP), dAMP (AMPplateau-AMPbaseline) and compensatory reserve index correlation coefficient between ICP and AMP (RAP). To avoid confounding factors, included patients had to be non-decompressed or with cranioplasty > 1 month previously and Rout > 6 mmHg/min/ml. Compliance was assessed using the elasticity coefficient. We also compared infusion-tested TBI patients selected for shunting versus those not selected for shunting (consultant decision based on clinical and radiological assessment and the infusion results). Finally, we used data from a group of shunted idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus (iNPH) patients for comparison.
Group A consisted of 36 patients with post-traumatic ventriculomegaly and Group B of 45 iNPH shunt responders. AMP and dAMP were significantly lower in Group A than B (0.55 ± 0.39 vs 1.02 ± 0.72; p < 0.01 and 1.58 ± 1.21 vs 2.76 ± 1.5; p < 0.01. RAP baseline was not significantly different between the two. Elasticity was higher than the normal limit in all groups (average 0.18 1/ml). Significantly higher Rout was present in those with probable PTH selected for shunting compared with unshunted. Mild/moderate hydrocephalus, ex-vacuo ventriculomegaly/encephalomalacia were inconsistently reported in PTH patients.
Rout and AMP were significantly lower in PTH compared to iNPH and did not always reflect the degree of hydrocephalus or atrophy reported on CT/MRI. Compliance appears reduced in PTH.
创伤后脑积水(PTH)可能诊断不足和治疗不足,因此需要更有效的诊断工具。我们旨在报告创伤性脑损伤(TBI)伴脑室扩大患者的脑脊液动力学。
我们回顾性分析了接受脑脊液输注试验的创伤后脑积水患者。我们计算了脑脊液流出阻力(Rout)、AMP(颅内压脉冲幅度,ICP)、dAMP(AMP 平台-AMP 基线)和 ICP 与 AMP 之间的补偿储备指数相关系数(RAP)。为了避免混杂因素,纳入的患者必须是非减压或颅骨成形术>1 个月前,且 Rout>6mmHg/min/ml。采用弹性系数评估顺应性。我们还比较了选择分流和未选择分流的 TBI 患者(根据临床和影像学评估和输注结果由顾问决定)。最后,我们使用一组分流特发性正常压力脑积水(iNPH)患者的数据进行比较。
A 组包括 36 例创伤性脑室扩大患者,B 组包括 45 例 iNPH 分流反应者。与 B 组相比,A 组的 AMP 和 dAMP 明显较低(0.55±0.39 对 1.02±0.72;p<0.01 和 1.58±1.21 对 2.76±1.5;p<0.01)。RAP 基线在两组之间无显著差异。所有组的弹性均高于正常上限(平均 0.18 1/ml)。与未分流相比,选择分流的可能 PTH 患者的 Rout 明显更高。在 PTH 患者中,轻度/中度脑积水、脑室外隙扩大/脑软化的报告不一致。
与 iNPH 相比,PTH 的 Rout 和 AMP 明显较低,并不总是反映 CT/MRI 报告的脑积水或萎缩程度。PTH 患者的顺应性似乎降低。