Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation Department, Hôpital Nord, CHU de Saint-Etienne, Jean Monnet University, Université de Lyon, Saint-Etienne, France.
Renal Transplantation Department, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Necker Hospital, Paris, France; Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Transplantation. 2020 Dec;104(12):2487-2496. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003242.
Long-term safety of living kidney donation (LKD), especially for young donors, has become a real matter of concern in the transplant community and may contribute to creating resistance to LKD. In this context, the criteria that govern living donor donations must live up to very demanding standards as well as adjust to this novel reality. In the first part, we review the existing guidelines published after 2010 and critically examine their recommendations to see how they do not necessarily lead to consistent and universal practices in the choice of specific thresholds for a parameter used to accept or reject a living donor candidate. In the second part, we present the emergence of a new paradigm for LKD developed in the 2017 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes guidelines with the introduction of an integrative risk-based approach. Finally, we focus on predonation renal function evaluation, a criteria that remain central in the selection process, and discuss several issues surrounding the donor candidate's glomerular filtration rate assessment.
长期活体肾捐献(LKD)的安全性,特别是对于年轻供体而言,已成为移植界真正关注的问题,这可能导致人们对 LKD 产生抵触情绪。在这种情况下,指导活体供体捐献的标准必须达到非常严格的标准,并适应这一新现实。在第一部分中,我们回顾了 2010 年后发布的现有指南,并对其建议进行了批判性审查,以了解它们并不一定导致在接受或拒绝活体供体候选人时使用的特定参数的具体阈值的选择方面存在一致和普遍的做法。在第二部分中,我们介绍了 2017 年《肾脏病:改善全球预后》指南中出现的 LKD 的新范例,该指南引入了一种综合的基于风险的方法。最后,我们重点关注供体前肾功能评估,这一标准仍然是选择过程的核心,并讨论了围绕候选供体肾小球滤过率评估的几个问题。