Suppr超能文献

增加研究员招募:如何优化研究员计划网站?

Increasing Fellow Recruitment: How Can Fellowship Program Websites Be Optimized?

机构信息

From the Orlando Health Orthopaedic Institute, Florida State College of Medicine, University of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, FL (Dr. Shaath and Dr. Avilucea), the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Irvine, CA (Dr. Lim), and the Division of Orthopaedic Trauma, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth, Houston, TX (Dr. Warner and Dr. Achor).

出版信息

J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 Dec 15;28(24):e1105-e1110. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00804.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the importance of factors considered by orthopaedic trauma fellowship applicants when evaluating programs. We hypothesized that applicants will prioritize consistent factors when applying to programs. In addition, we assessed how the applicants use the Internet to research potential fellowships. Our goal is to provide fellowships with information to optimize both their fellowship and online contents.

METHODS

At the 2018 and 2019 Orthopaedic Trauma Association meetings, a paper survey was given to each attendee of multiple fellowships' informational sessions. The survey consisted of 25 factors that applicants may consider when evaluating fellowships ranked on a 1-to-5 Likert scale. Additional questions were asked to determine how applicants use the Internet and social media when researching fellowships.

RESULTS

We received 111 surveys (roughly a 56% response rate). Ninety-eight applicants (88%) indicated that they use fellowship websites to research fellowships. The utilization of fellowship websites was markedly greater than the use of other online resources. The highest rated factors surveyed were surgical experience (mean 4.95; SD 0.26), pelvic and acetabular experience (4.80; 0.52), lower extremity fracture experience (4.75; 0.58), and current faculty at the fellowship (4.55; 0.78). The lowest rated factors were the ability to moonlight (2.04; 1.08), salary (1.88; 1.12), and spine trauma experience (1.45; 0.87). Surgical experience and pelvic/acetabular experience were rated markedly higher than every other factor surveyed.

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that most orthopaedic trauma fellowship applicants use fellowship websites when researching programs. Programs may use this study to optimize their fellowship experience to reflect what the applicants value. In addition, programs may use this study as a guide when updating their websites. Fellowships with informative websites that meaningfully highlight their fellowship experience may have a competitive edge in attracting applicants to their programs.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在确定骨科创伤 fellowship申请人在评估项目时考虑的因素的重要性。我们假设申请人在申请项目时会优先考虑一致的因素。此外,我们评估了申请人如何使用互联网来研究潜在的奖学金。我们的目标是为奖学金提供信息,以优化他们的奖学金和在线内容。

方法

在 2018 年和 2019 年骨科创伤协会会议上,向多个奖学金信息会议的每位与会者发放了一份纸质调查。该调查包括申请人在评估奖学金时可能考虑的 25 个因素,这些因素按 1 到 5 的李克特量表进行排名。还提出了其他问题,以确定申请人在研究奖学金时如何使用互联网和社交媒体。

结果

我们收到了 111 份调查(约 56%的回复率)。98 名申请人(88%)表示他们使用奖学金网站来研究奖学金。对奖学金网站的利用明显高于其他在线资源的利用。调查中评分最高的因素是手术经验(平均 4.95;SD 0.26)、骨盆和髋臼经验(4.80;0.52)、下肢骨折经验(4.75;0.58)和当前 fellowship的教员(4.55;0.78)。评分最低的因素是兼职能力(2.04;1.08)、薪水(1.88;1.12)和脊柱创伤经验(1.45;0.87)。手术经验和骨盆/髋臼经验的评分明显高于其他所有调查因素。

讨论

据我们所知,这是第一项表明大多数骨科创伤 fellowship申请人在研究项目时使用奖学金网站的研究。项目可以利用这项研究来优化他们的奖学金体验,以反映申请人的价值观。此外,项目可以使用这项研究作为更新网站的指南。拥有内容丰富的网站并能有意义地突出其奖学金经验的奖学金,在吸引申请人参加其项目方面可能具有竞争优势。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验