Suppr超能文献

自我偏向效应:对自有财产的接近和回避动作的启动速度都会加快。

Self-bias effect: movement initiation to self-owned property is speeded for both approach and avoidance actions.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia.

Department of Cognitive Science, Central European University, 1051, Budapest, Hungary.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2021 Jun;85(4):1391-1406. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01325-0. Epub 2020 Mar 30.

Abstract

Recall of, and physical interaction with, self-owned items is privileged over items owned by other people (Constable et al. in Cognition 119(3):430-437, 2011; Cunningham et al. in Conscious Cognit 17(1):312-318, 2008). Here, we investigate approach (towards the item), compared with avoidance (away from the item) movements to images of self- and experimenter-owned items. We asked if initiation time and movement duration of button-press approach responses to self-owned items are associated with a systematic self-bias (overall faster responses), compared with avoidance movements, similar to findings of paradigms investigating affective evaluation of (unowned) items. Participants were gifted mugs to use, and after a few days they completed an approach-avoidance task (Chen and Bargh in Pers Soc Psychol Bull 25(2):215-224, 1999; Seibt et al. in J Exp Soc Psychol 44:713-720, 2008; Truong et al. in J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 42(3), 375-385, 2016) to images of their own or the experimenter's mug, using either congruent or incongruent movement direction mappings. There was a self-bias effect for initiation time to the self-owned mug, for both congruent and incongruent mappings, and for movement duration in the congruent mapping. The effect was abolished in Experiment 2 when participants responded based on a shape on the handle rather than mug ownership. We speculate that ownership status requires conscious processing to modulate responses. Moreover, ownership status judgements and affective evaluation may employ different mechanisms.

摘要

人们会优先对自己拥有的物品进行回忆和进行身体互动,而不是对其他人拥有的物品进行回忆和进行身体互动(Constable 等人,《认知》,119(3):430-437,2011;Cunningham 等人,《意识与认知》,17(1):312-318,2008)。在这里,我们研究了对自己和实验者拥有的物品的图片进行接近(朝着物品)和回避(远离物品)运动的情况。我们询问了与回避运动相比,按下按钮进行接近反应的自我启动时间和运动持续时间是否与系统的自我偏差(整体更快的反应)有关,这与研究(非自己拥有的)物品情感评价的范式的发现相似。参与者被赠送了杯子来使用,几天后,他们完成了一个接近-回避任务(Chen 和 Bargh,《个性与社会心理学公报》,25(2):215-224,1999;Seibt 等人,《实验社会心理学杂志》,44:713-720,2008;Truong 等人,《实验心理学杂志:人类感知与表现》,42(3):375-385,2016),用杯子的自己或实验者的图片,使用一致或不一致的运动方向映射。对于自己拥有的杯子,无论是一致还是不一致的映射,对于启动时间,以及对于一致映射中的运动持续时间,都存在自我偏差效应。在实验 2 中,当参与者根据手柄上的形状而不是杯子的所有权进行反应时,这种效应被消除了。我们推测,所有权状态需要有意识的处理来调节反应。此外,所有权状态判断和情感评价可能采用不同的机制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验