School of Air traffic Management, Civil Aviation University of China, Tianjin 300300, China.
CAAC Key laboratory of General Aviation Operation (Civil Aviation Management Institute of China), Beijing 102202, China.
Math Biosci Eng. 2020 Feb 14;17(3):2402-2417. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020130.
The present research envisages a novel group decision making model to evaluate the operational risk of airports from four aspects of human, equipment, management and environment factors. The proposed model featured an integration of intuitionistic fuzzy set and set pair analysis. Due to the lack of the systematic data and quantitative analysis concerning the uncertainty of these indicators, an intuitionistic fuzzy set was used to characterize them, which converted them into the ternary connection numbers based on set pair analysis. A new distance based on the intuitionistic fuzzy set and set pair analysis was proposed to analyze the consistency degree of any two experts on the same airport operation risk, wherein the degree of contact determined both the uncertainty and certainty of each indicator, so as to obtain the ranking degree of the expert group on the operation risk of all airports. Moreover, the relationship between the value of these indicators and the threshold changes of the airport operation risk ranking was evaluated. This study could be used as an effective tool for transit authorities to rank the operational risk of different airports, by comprehensively considering the viewpoint deviation of different decision makers on the same scheme, and its uncertainty factors. The analysis of the case study comprising four airports in China showed that with an increase in the degree of contact, the operation risk value of the airport in Beijing remained the same that of Tianjin and Qinhuangdao decreased, and for Shijiazhuang gradually increased.
本研究提出了一种新的群决策模型,从人员、设备、管理和环境因素四个方面评估机场的运营风险。所提出的模型的特点是直觉模糊集和集对分析的集成。由于缺乏这些指标不确定性的系统数据和定量分析,因此使用直觉模糊集来描述它们,将它们转换为基于集对分析的三元联系数。提出了一种新的基于直觉模糊集和集对分析的距离来分析任何两个专家对同一机场运营风险的一致性程度,其中接触程度确定了每个指标的不确定性和确定性,从而获得专家组对所有机场运营风险的排名程度。此外,还评估了这些指标的值与机场运营风险排名变化的阈值之间的关系。本研究可以作为过境当局的有效工具,通过综合考虑不同决策者对同一方案的观点偏差及其不确定性因素,对不同机场的运营风险进行排名。对包括中国四个机场的案例研究的分析表明,随着接触程度的增加,北京机场的运营风险值保持不变,天津和秦皇岛机场的运营风险值降低,而石家庄机场的运营风险值逐渐增加。