Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Nußbaumstr. 5a, 80336 Munich, Germany.
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Nußbaumstr. 5a, 80336 Munich, Germany.
Brain Res. 2020 Jul 1;1738:146811. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2020.146811. Epub 2020 Mar 29.
Dissociations between reading and spelling deficits are likely to be associated with distinct deficits in orthographic word processing. To specify differences in automatic visual word recognition, the current ERP-study compared children with isolated reading fluency deficits (iRD), isolated spelling deficits (iSD), and combined reading fluency and spelling deficits (cRSD) as well as typically developing (TD) 10-year-olds while performing a variant of the Reicher-Wheeler paradigm: children had to indicate which of two letters occurred at a given position in a previously presented word, legal pseudoword, illegal pseudoword or nonword. Event-related potentials (N200 and N400) associated with sublexical orthographic and lexical orthographic processing as well as phonological word processing were analyzed. All groups showed a word superiority effect, both on the behavioral and the neurophysiological level. Group differences occurred for phonological word processing. TD and iRD groups showed a higher N400 activation for illegal pseudowords than for nonwords, while the two spelling deficit groups showed no activation differences between these two stimuli conditions. The findings suggest that differences in phonological word processing are associated with spelling problems: children with iSD showed reduced sensitivity for phonological word processing, while these deficits were not evident in children with iRD.
阅读和拼写缺陷之间的分离很可能与特定的正字法单词处理缺陷有关。为了明确自动视觉单词识别的差异,当前的 ERP 研究比较了孤立的阅读流畅性缺陷(iRD)、孤立的拼写缺陷(iSD)、阅读流畅性和拼写缺陷(cRSD)的儿童以及典型发育(TD)的 10 岁儿童,同时进行了 Reicher-Wheeler 范式的变体:儿童必须指出在先前呈现的单词、合法的伪词、非法的伪词或非词中,两个字母中的哪一个出现在给定位置。分析了与次词汇正字法和词汇正字法处理以及语音词处理相关的事件相关电位(N200 和 N400)。所有组在行为和神经生理水平上都表现出单词优势效应。在语音词处理方面存在组间差异。TD 和 iRD 组在非法伪词上的 N400 激活高于非词,而两个拼写缺陷组在这两个刺激条件之间没有激活差异。研究结果表明,语音词处理方面的差异与拼写问题有关:iSD 儿童在语音词处理方面的敏感性降低,而 iRD 儿童则没有表现出这些缺陷。