Suppr超能文献

调强质子治疗(IMPT)与容积旋转调强弧形治疗(VMAT)治疗口咽癌的急性毒性和患者报告结局的比较分析。

Comparative analysis of acute toxicities and patient reported outcomes between intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for the treatment of oropharyngeal cancer.

机构信息

Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.

出版信息

Radiother Oncol. 2020 Jun;147:64-74. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.03.010. Epub 2020 Mar 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

IMPT improves normal tissue sparing compared to VMAT in treating oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). Our aim was to assess if this translates into clinical benefits.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

OPC patients treated with definitive or adjuvant IMPT or VMAT from 2013 to 2018 were included. All underwent prospective assessment using patient-reported-outcomes (PROs) (EORTC-QLQ-H&N35) and provider-assessed toxicities (CTCAEv4.03). End-of-treatment and pretreatment scores were compared. PEG-tube use, hospitalization, and narcotic use were retrospectively collected. Statistical analysis used the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test with propensity matching for PROs/provider-assessed toxicities, and t-tests for other clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

46 IMPT and 259 VMAT patients were included; median follow-up was 12 months (IMPT) and 30 months (VMAT). Baseline characteristics were balanced except for age (p = 0.04, IMPT were older) and smoking (p < 0.01, 10.9% IMPT >20PYs, 29.3% VMAT). IMPT was associated with lower PEG placement (OR = 0.27; 95% CI: 0.12-0.59; p = 0.001) and less hospitalization ≤60 days post-RT (OR = 0.21; 95% CI:0.07-0.6, p < 0.001), with subgroup analysis revealing strongest benefits in patients treated definitively or with concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). IMPT was associated with a relative risk reduction of 22.3% for end-of-treatment narcotic use. Patients reported reduced cough and dysgeusia with IMPT (p < 0.05); patients treated definitively or with CRT also reported feeling less ill, reduced feeding tube use, and better swallow. Provider-assessed toxicities demonstrated less pain and mucositis with IMPT, but more mucosal infection.

CONCLUSION

IMPT is associated with improved PROs, reduced PEG-tube placement, hospitalization, and narcotic requirements. Mucositis, dysphagia, and pain were decreased with IMPT. Benefits were predominantly seen in patients treated definitively or with CRT.

摘要

背景与目的

调强适形放疗(IMPT)相较于容积旋转调强放疗(VMAT)在治疗口咽癌(OPC)时能更好地保护正常组织。本研究旨在评估这种改善是否能转化为临床获益。

材料与方法

纳入 2013 年至 2018 年间接受根治性或辅助性 IMPT 或 VMAT 治疗的 OPC 患者。所有患者均接受前瞻性评估,使用患者报告结局(PROs)(EORTC-QLQ-H&N35)和提供者评估的毒性(CTCAEv4.03)。比较治疗结束时和治疗前的评分。回顾性收集 PEG 管使用、住院和麻醉药物使用情况。采用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验和倾向评分匹配对 PROs/提供者评估的毒性进行统计学分析,采用 t 检验对其他临床结局进行统计学分析。

结果

纳入 46 例 IMPT 患者和 259 例 VMAT 患者;中位随访时间为 12 个月(IMPT)和 30 个月(VMAT)。除年龄(p=0.04,IMPT 患者年龄较大)和吸烟(p<0.01,10.9%的 IMPT 患者吸烟 20 年以上,29.3%的 VMAT 患者吸烟)外,两组患者的基线特征均衡。IMPT 与较低的 PEG 置管率(比值比=0.27;95%可信区间:0.12-0.59;p=0.001)和放疗后≤60 天内的住院率(比值比=0.21;95%可信区间:0.07-0.6,p<0.001)相关,亚组分析显示,在接受根治性治疗或同期放化疗(CRT)的患者中获益最大。IMPT 可使治疗结束时麻醉药物使用率相对降低 22.3%。患者报告 IMPT 治疗后咳嗽和味觉障碍减轻(p<0.05);接受根治性治疗或 CRT 的患者还报告感觉更舒适、减少了喂养管的使用以及吞咽功能改善。提供者评估的毒性表明,IMPT 治疗后疼痛和黏膜炎减少,但黏膜感染增加。

结论

IMPT 与改善 PROs、减少 PEG 管放置、住院和麻醉药物需求相关。IMPT 治疗可减少黏膜炎、吞咽困难和疼痛。这些获益主要见于接受根治性治疗或 CRT 的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验