Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health (ARCPOH), Adelaide Dental School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Department of Public Health, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 1;15(4):e0230724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230724. eCollection 2020.
The present study aims to develop the Race-related Attitudes and Multiculturalism Scale (RRAMS), as well as to perform an initial psychometric assessment of this instrument in a national sample of Australian adults.
The sample comprised 2,714 Australian adults who took part in the 2013 National Dental Telephone Interview Survey (NDTIS), which includes a telephone-based interview and a follow-up postal questionnaire. We used Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) to evaluate the RRAMS' factorial structure (n = 271) and then proceeded with Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) to confirm the proposed structure in an independent sample (n = 2,443). Measurement invariance was evaluated according to sex, age and educational attainment. Construct validity was assessed through known-groups comparisons. Internal consistency was assessed with McDonald's ΩH and ordinal α. Multiple imputation by chained equations was adopted to handle missing data.
EFA indicated that, after excluding 4 out of the 12 items, a two-factor structure provided a good fit to the data. This configural structure was then confirmed in an independent sample by means of CFA (χ2(19) = 341.070, p<0.001, CFI = 0.974, RMSEA = 0.083; 90% CI [0.076, 0.091]). Measurement invariance analyses suggested that the RRAMS items can be used to compare men/women, respondents with/without tertiary education and young/older participants. The "Anglo-centric/Assimilationist attitudes" (ΩH = 0.83, αORDINAL = 0.85) and "Inclusive/Pluralistic attitudes" subscales (ΩH = 0.77, αORDINAL = 0.79) showed adequate reliability. Men and participants with low education had higher Anglo-centric/assimilationist attitudes and lower inclusive/pluralistic attitudes, suggesting construct validity.
The RRAMS appears to be a valid and reliable measure to evaluate multiculturalist attitudes in the Australian context. The instrument may be useful in the assessment and monitoring of interventions aiming to promote multiculturalist inclusive attitudes and to increase social cohesion in Australia.
本研究旨在开发种族相关态度和多元文化主义量表(RRAMS),并在澳大利亚成年人的全国样本中对该工具进行初步心理测量评估。
该样本包括 2714 名参加 2013 年全国牙科电话访谈调查(NDTIS)的澳大利亚成年人,该调查包括基于电话的访谈和后续的邮寄问卷。我们使用探索性因素分析(EFA)来评估 RRAMS 的因子结构(n=271),然后在独立样本(n=2443)中进行验证性因素分析(CFA)以确认提出的结构。根据性别、年龄和教育程度评估测量不变性。通过已知群体比较评估结构效度。采用麦当劳的ΩH 和 ordinal α 评估内部一致性。采用链式方程的多重插补处理缺失数据。
EFA 表明,在排除 12 个项目中的 4 个项目后,双因素结构可以很好地拟合数据。然后通过 CFA 在独立样本中确认了这种结构(χ2(19)=341.070,p<0.001,CFI=0.974,RMSEA=0.083;90%CI[0.076,0.091])。测量不变性分析表明,RRAMS 项目可用于比较男性/女性、具有/不具有高等教育的受访者以及年轻/年长的参与者。“盎格鲁中心/同化态度”(ΩH=0.83,αORDINAL=0.85)和“包容/多元态度”分量表(ΩH=0.77,αORDINAL=0.79)表现出足够的可靠性。男性和教育程度较低的参与者具有更高的盎格鲁中心/同化态度和更低的包容/多元态度,表明具有结构效度。
RRAMS 似乎是一种在澳大利亚背景下评估多元文化主义态度的有效和可靠的工具。该工具可能有助于评估旨在促进多元文化包容态度和增加澳大利亚社会凝聚力的干预措施,并对其进行监测。