Department of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
Department of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
Mod Pathol. 2020 Sep;33(9):1678-1689. doi: 10.1038/s41379-020-0531-2. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
We studied the characteristics of the provisional category de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with mutated RUNX1 (AML-RUNX1) proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO). Until now, most published studies have combined de novo and secondary AML-RUNX1. We compared the clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes of WHO-defined de novo AML-RUNX1 with de novo AML without RUNX1 alterations (AML-RUNX1). We performed sequential NGS to assess RUNX1 mutation stability over disease course. We identified 46 de novo AML-RUNX1 patients [32 (70%) men, 14 (30%) women; median age, 66.5 years] with 54 RUNX1 mutations [median VAF, 32% (2-97%)]. Point mutations clustered within the runt-homology-domain and frame-shift mutations within the transactivation domain. Compared with AML-RUNX1, AML-RUNX1 showed male predominance (p = 0.02), higher frequency of SRSF2 (p = 0.02), and ASXL1 (p = 0.0004) mutations and normal karyotype (p = 0.01), and absent NPM1 mutations (p = 0.0002). De novo AML-RUNX1 showed no significant difference in overall survival (OS) compared with AML-RUNX1 (median: 26 vs. 32 months) (p = 0.71). AML-RUNX1 with clonal RUNX1 mutation (≥20% VAF) had shorter OS than subclonal <20% VAF (23 months vs. undefined; p = 0.04). However, the difference was not significant when compared with AML-RUNX1 (23 vs. 32 months; p = 0.23). No significant OS difference was noted between de novo AML-RUNX1 and AML-NOS-RUNX1. By sequential multigene mutation profiling, RUNX1 mutation disappeared at relapse in one of ten patients. Overall, the findings support separate categorization of this entity. However, there is no significant outcome difference compared with AML-RUNX1.
我们研究了世界卫生组织(WHO)提出的暂定类别初发性急性髓系白血病(AML)伴突变 RUNX1(AML-RUNX1)的特征。到目前为止,大多数已发表的研究都将初发性和继发性 AML-RUNX1 结合在一起。我们比较了 WHO 定义的初发性 AML-RUNX1 与初发性无 RUNX1 改变的 AML(AML-RUNX1)的临床病理特征和结果。我们进行了连续的 NGS 以评估疾病过程中 RUNX1 突变的稳定性。我们鉴定了 46 例初发性 AML-RUNX1 患者[32 例(70%)为男性,14 例(30%)为女性;中位年龄 66.5 岁],其中 54 例存在 RUNX1 突变[中位 VAF,32%(2-97%)]。点突变聚集在 runt 同源结构域内,而移码突变则位于反式激活结构域内。与 AML-RUNX1 相比,AML-RUNX1 表现为男性优势(p=0.02)、更高频率的 SRSF2(p=0.02)和 ASXL1(p=0.0004)突变以及正常核型(p=0.01),且不存在 NPM1 突变(p=0.0002)。与 AML-RUNX1 相比,初发性 AML-RUNX1 的总生存期(OS)无显著差异(中位:26 个月与 32 个月)(p=0.71)。AML-RUNX1 伴克隆性 RUNX1 突变(≥20% VAF)的 OS 短于亚克隆性<20% VAF(23 个月与未定义;p=0.04)。然而,与 AML-RUNX1 相比,差异无统计学意义(23 个月与 32 个月;p=0.23)。初发性 AML-RUNX1 与 AML-NOS-RUNX1 之间的 OS 无显著差异。通过连续的多基因突变分析,10 例患者中有 1 例在复发时 RUNX1 突变消失。总的来说,这些发现支持对该实体进行单独分类。然而,与 AML-RUNX1 相比,结果无显著差异。