Suppr超能文献

多中心环境下急性髓系白血病干细胞评估的适用性和可重复性。

Applicability and reproducibility of acute myeloid leukaemia stem cell assessment in a multi-centre setting.

机构信息

Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, Department of Clinical Immunology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Br J Haematol. 2020 Sep;190(6):891-900. doi: 10.1111/bjh.16594. Epub 2020 Apr 2.

Abstract

Leukaemic stem cells (LSC) have been experimentally defined as the leukaemia-propagating population and are thought to be the cellular reservoir of relapse in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). Therefore, LSC measurements are warranted to facilitate accurate risk stratification. Previously, we published the composition of a one-tube flow cytometric assay, characterised by the presence of 13 important membrane markers for LSC detection. Here we present the validation experiments of the assay in several large AML research centres, both in Europe and the United States. Variability within instruments and sample processing showed high correlations between different instruments (R  > 0·91, P < 0·001). Multi-centre testing introduced variation in reported LSC percentages but was found to be below the clinical relevant threshold. Clear gating protocols resulted in all laboratories being able to perform LSC assessment of the validation set. Participating centres were nearly unanimously able to distinguish LSC (>0·03% LSC) from LSC (<0·03% LSC) despite inter-laboratory variation in reported LSC percentages. This study proves that the LSC assay is highly reproducible. These results together with the high prognostic impact of LSC load at diagnosis in AML patients render the one-tube LSC assessment a good marker for future risk classification.

摘要

白血病干细胞(LSC)已被实验定义为白血病增殖群体,被认为是急性髓系白血病(AML)复发的细胞库。因此,需要进行 LSC 测量以促进准确的风险分层。此前,我们发表了一种单管流式细胞术检测方法的组成,其特征在于存在 13 个用于 LSC 检测的重要膜标记物。在这里,我们在欧洲和美国的几个大型 AML 研究中心展示了该检测方法的验证实验。仪器和样本处理的内部差异显示出不同仪器之间的高度相关性(R>0.91,P<0.001)。多中心测试引入了报告的 LSC 百分比的变化,但发现低于临床相关阈值。明确的门控方案使所有实验室都能够对验证集进行 LSC 评估。尽管报告的 LSC 百分比存在实验室间差异,但参与中心几乎一致能够区分 LSC(>0.03% LSC)和 LSC(<0.03% LSC)。这项研究证明了 LSC 检测具有高度的可重复性。这些结果以及 AML 患者诊断时 LSC 负荷的高预后影响,使得单管 LSC 评估成为未来风险分类的良好标志物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e42/7540683/2bddee20029e/BJH-190-891-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验