Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
BMJ Open. 2020 Apr 1;10(4):e035259. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035259.
To compare days on sick leave and assess predictors of return to work following shoulder surgery.
A secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial.
Orthopaedic department.
114 patients with type II superior labral tear from anterior to posterior of the shoulder.
Labral repair, biceps tenodesis or sham surgery.
Sick leave was obtained from national registers for the last year before and 2 years following surgery. Total and shoulder related number of days on sick leave were obtained, using international diagnostic codes. We applied the difference-in-difference approach to compare the differences in the change in mean work days on sick leave between groups over time, backwards logistic regression and lasso regression to evaluate predictors.
Mean total number of work days on sick leave during the 2 years after surgery was 148 (range 0-460) days. More than 80% of the sick leave days were taken by 22% of the patients. Days on sick leave classified as shoulder-related constituted 80% of the total. In all three treatment groups, the mean total number of days on sick leave doubled the year after surgery. Sham surgery and labral repair had fewer postoperative sickness absence days compared with biceps tenodesis but differences were not significant when adjusted for days of sick leave the year before surgery. Predictors of return to work at 2 years analysed by logistic regression were no sick leave (OR 8.0, 95% CI 2.4 to 26.0) and moderate symptoms of anxiety or depression (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.5) at inclusion. Similar results were obtained by lasso regression but manual work was an additional predictor.
Change in mean work days on sick leave comparing sham surgery, labral repair and biceps tenodesis, was not significantly different. Sick leave, symptoms of anxiety and depression, and manual work at inclusion predicted work status 2 years after surgery.
NCT00586742.
比较肩手术后的病假天数,并评估重返工作岗位的预测因素。
一项随机对照试验的二次分析。
矫形外科系。
114 例肩前至后型 II 型上盂唇撕裂患者。
盂唇修复、肱二头肌肌腱固定术或假手术。
手术前一年和手术后 2 年从国家登记处获得病假情况。使用国际诊断代码获得总病假天数和与肩部相关的病假天数。我们应用差值法比较各组随时间变化的平均病假天数的差异,向后逻辑回归和套索回归评估预测因素。
手术后 2 年的平均总病假天数为 148 天(范围 0-460 天)。超过 80%的病假天数由 22%的患者承担。病假天数中与肩部相关的占总数的 80%。在所有三组治疗中,手术后一年的平均总病假天数增加了一倍。假手术和盂唇修复与肱二头肌肌腱固定术相比,术后病假天数较少,但调整手术前一年的病假天数后,差异无统计学意义。通过逻辑回归分析的 2 年重返工作岗位的预测因素是无病假(OR 8.0,95%CI 2.4 至 26.0)和中度焦虑或抑郁症状(OR 0.16,95%CI 0.05 至 0.5)。套索回归得到了类似的结果,但手工工作是另一个预测因素。
假手术、盂唇修复和肱二头肌肌腱固定术之间平均病假天数的变化无显著差异。病假、焦虑和抑郁症状以及纳入时的体力劳动状态预测手术后 2 年的工作状态。
NCT00586742。