Finnish Institute of Occupational Health. PO Box 40, FI-00032 Työterveyslaitos, Finland.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2019 Mar 1;45(2):203-208. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3780. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
Objectives We analyzed social security costs based on an earlier quasi-experiment that compared work participation between partial sickness beneficiaries and a matched group of full sickness beneficiaries. Methods Utilizing a population-based 70% representative sample, 1878 persons with part-time sick leave (intervention group) due to musculoskeletal diseases or mental disorders at an early stage of work disability and their propensity-score-matched controls with full-time sick leave were followed for two years. The outcome was the difference (absolute and relative) in social security costs between the intervention and control groups during follow-up. Costs of sickness absence, vocational rehabilitation, unemployment, and retirement days were calculated from national administrative registers. Results A cost reduction of €2395 per person per year [95% confidence interval (CI) -2890- -1899) was observed in the intervention compared with the control group. The cost ratio was 0.512 (95% CI 0.511-0.513). The largest savings were attributable to differences in the costs of retirement and vocational rehabilitation. The savings were higher for the second compared with the first follow-up year. Costs were saved across both genders and diagnostic groups, however, savings for women with musculoskeletal diseases were lowest. Conclusions Part-time instead of full-time sick leave, at the early stage of work disability due to musculoskeletal diseases or mental disorders, leads to considerable social security cost savings during two years, in correspondence with increased work participation and in addition to earlier reported health benefits. Part-time sick leave can be recommended from an economic perspective; however more consideration should be given to women with musculoskeletal diseases.
我们根据一项早期的准实验进行了社会保障成本分析,该实验比较了部分病假受益人和全病假受益人之间的工作参与情况。
利用基于人群的 70%代表性样本,对 1878 名患有肌肉骨骼疾病或精神障碍且处于工作残疾早期的兼职病假者(干预组)及其全病假的倾向得分匹配对照组进行了为期两年的随访。结果是在随访期间干预组与对照组之间的社会保障成本差异(绝对和相对)。从国家行政登记册中计算了病假、职业康复、失业和退休天数的成本。
与对照组相比,干预组每人每年的成本降低了 2395 欧元(95%置信区间为-2890 至-1899)。成本比为 0.512(95%置信区间为 0.511-0.513)。最大的节省归因于退休和职业康复成本的差异。与第一年相比,第二年的节省更高。节省适用于两性和诊断组,但肌肉骨骼疾病女性的节省最低。
患有肌肉骨骼疾病或精神障碍的人在残疾早期,选择兼职病假而非全病假,可以在两年内节省相当可观的社会保障成本,同时增加工作参与度,并且除了之前报告的健康益处外,还能获得额外的益处。从经济角度来看,可以推荐兼职病假,但对于患有肌肉骨骼疾病的女性,应给予更多考虑。