Suppr超能文献

中风患者留置导尿管的试行拔除:北岸医院的一项临床审计

Trial removal of indwelling urinary catheters in stroke patients: a clinical audit at North Shore Hospital.

作者信息

Rasanathan Dushiyanthi, Wang Xu

机构信息

House Surgeon, Department of General Medicine, Waitemata District Health Board, Auckland.

General Medicine and Stroke Physician, Department of General Medicine, Waitemata District Health Board, Auckland.

出版信息

N Z Med J. 2020 Apr 3;133(1512):15-21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This is a baseline clinical audit looking at indwelling urinary catheter (IDC) use and trial removal of catheter (TROC) in stroke patients. We collected data on stroke patients admitted to North Shore Hospital between 26 November 2018-24 May 2019, who underwent insertion of an IDC as an inpatient. A minority of patients had TROC within the recommended guideline period. A high incidence of urinary tract infection (UTI) was found in this patient population. Insufficient documentation and inappropriate indications for IDC insertion were features noted during this audit. Daily electronic reminders and prompting by all members of the rehabilitation team concerning TROC are important to reduce catheter days and reduce UTI rates.

AIMS

To identify if the trial removal of indwelling urinary catheters (TROC) in stroke patients complies with the 2016 American Heart Association/American Stroke Association (AHA/ASA) AHSA guidelines, and to identify any precipitating factors that prevent compliance with the guidelines.

METHODS

We performed a clinical baseline audit that identified patients who were admitted to the acute stroke ward at North Shore Hospital with a diagnosis of stroke from 26 November 2018-24 May 2019 and had an indwelling urinary catheter (IDC) inserted during their admission. The audit consisted of both retrospective and prospective components. Data was collected on patient demographics, the documented indication for IDC insertion, total number of catheter days, the incidence of UTIs and the outcomes after catheter removal.

RESULTS

A total of 49 patients were included. 4.1% of patients had catheters removed within 24 hours (95% confidence interval: 0.011-0.137). The average number of catheter days before removal of IDC was approximately five days. 24.5% of our patient sample went on to develop a urinary tract infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Insufficient documentation and inappropriate indications for IDC insertion were features noted during this audit. Daily electronic reminders and prompting concerning TROC are important to reduce catheter days and reduce infection rates. Indwelling catheters and associated infections impact the length of hospitalisation, mortality and morbidity of stroke patients.

摘要

背景

这是一项关于中风患者留置导尿管(IDC)使用情况及导尿管试行拔除(TROC)的基线临床审计。我们收集了2018年11月26日至2019年5月24日期间入住北岸医院且住院期间接受了IDC插入术的中风患者的数据。少数患者在推荐的指南期限内进行了TROC。在该患者群体中发现了较高的尿路感染(UTI)发生率。本次审计中注意到的特点是IDC插入的记录不足和指征不当。康复团队所有成员每天进行电子提醒并提示TROC对于减少导尿管留置天数和降低UTI发生率很重要。

目的

确定中风患者的导尿管试行拔除(TROC)是否符合2016年美国心脏协会/美国中风协会(AHA/ASA)AHSA指南,并确定妨碍遵守指南的任何诱发因素。

方法

我们进行了一项临床基线审计,确定了2018年11月26日至2019年5月24日期间因中风诊断入住北岸医院急性中风病房且住院期间插入了留置导尿管(IDC)的患者。该审计包括回顾性和前瞻性部分。收集了患者人口统计学数据、记录的IDC插入指征、导尿管留置总天数、UTI发生率以及导尿管拔除后的结果。

结果

共纳入49例患者。4.1%的患者在24小时内拔除了导尿管(95%置信区间:)。拔除IDC前的平均导尿管留置天数约为5天。我们的患者样本中有24.5%继而发生了尿路感染。

结论

本次审计中注意到的特点是IDC插入的记录不足和指征不当。每天进行电子提醒并提示TROC对于减少导尿管留置天数和降低感染率很重要。留置导尿管及相关感染会影响中风患者的住院时间、死亡率和发病率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验